skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: Residue method versus saddle-point approximation

Abstract

In recent articles [K. Mishima et al., Phys. Rev. A, 66, 033401 (2002); S. D. Chao, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 053414 (2005)] it was proposed to use the residue theorem for the exact calculation of the transition amplitude describing strong-field ionization of atomic systems within Keldysh theory. This should avoid the necessity of applying the method of steepest descent (saddle-point approximation). Comparing the results of both approaches for atomic hydrogen a difference by a factor of 2 was found for the 1s and an even more drastic deviation for the 2s state. Thus it was concluded that the use of the saddle-point approximation is problematic. In this work the deviations are explained and it is shown that the previous conclusion is based on an unjustified neglect of an important contribution occurring in the application of the residue theorem. Furthermore, the applicability of the method of steepest descent for the ionization of Rydberg states is discussed and an improvement of the standard result is suggested that successfully removes the otherwise drastic failure for large principal quantum numbers.

Authors:
;  [1]
  1. AG Moderne Optik, Institut fuer Physik, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, D-10117 Berlin (Germany)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
20982351
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Physical Review. A; Journal Volume: 75; Journal Issue: 3; Other Information: DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.033403; (c) 2007 The American Physical Society; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
74 ATOMIC AND MOLECULAR PHYSICS; APPROXIMATIONS; ATOMS; FAILURES; HYDROGEN; PHOTOIONIZATION; PHOTON-ATOM COLLISIONS; QUANTUM NUMBERS; RESIDUES; RYDBERG STATES; SADDLE-POINT METHOD; TRANSITION AMPLITUDES

Citation Formats

Vanne, Yulian V., and Saenz, Alejandro. Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: Residue method versus saddle-point approximation. United States: N. p., 2007. Web. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVA.75.033403.
Vanne, Yulian V., & Saenz, Alejandro. Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: Residue method versus saddle-point approximation. United States. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVA.75.033403.
Vanne, Yulian V., and Saenz, Alejandro. Thu . "Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: Residue method versus saddle-point approximation". United States. doi:10.1103/PHYSREVA.75.033403.
@article{osti_20982351,
title = {Exact Keldysh theory of strong-field ionization: Residue method versus saddle-point approximation},
author = {Vanne, Yulian V. and Saenz, Alejandro},
abstractNote = {In recent articles [K. Mishima et al., Phys. Rev. A, 66, 033401 (2002); S. D. Chao, Phys. Rev. A, 72, 053414 (2005)] it was proposed to use the residue theorem for the exact calculation of the transition amplitude describing strong-field ionization of atomic systems within Keldysh theory. This should avoid the necessity of applying the method of steepest descent (saddle-point approximation). Comparing the results of both approaches for atomic hydrogen a difference by a factor of 2 was found for the 1s and an even more drastic deviation for the 2s state. Thus it was concluded that the use of the saddle-point approximation is problematic. In this work the deviations are explained and it is shown that the previous conclusion is based on an unjustified neglect of an important contribution occurring in the application of the residue theorem. Furthermore, the applicability of the method of steepest descent for the ionization of Rydberg states is discussed and an improvement of the standard result is suggested that successfully removes the otherwise drastic failure for large principal quantum numbers.},
doi = {10.1103/PHYSREVA.75.033403},
journal = {Physical Review. A},
number = 3,
volume = 75,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Thu Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}