skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The handling of causality in SEA guidance

Abstract

Causality, or the relation of cause and effect, is a fundamental notion in science, planning, and management. It is also a fundamental notion in impact assessment, as it relates action proposals with environmental impacts. Building on recent research about causality in impact assessment, this article turns to Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and examines eleven guidance documents to see whether and how they handle causality. The findings of this research, in line with results from similar research in EIA, indicate a weak handling of causality with regards to instruction, obligation, and theoretical support. The recommendations are to investigate the reasons for the observed trend, as there is no evidence in the guidance documents themselves, and to have the fundamental premise of causality in impact assessment safeguarded in future SEA guidance.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4]
  1. Departamento de Engenharia Biologica e Ambiental, Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Apartado 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real (Portugal). E-mail: tasso@utad.pt
  2. Department Stadtoekologie, Umweltplanung und Veerkehr, UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig (Germany). E-mail: marie.hanusch@ufz.de
  3. Department Stadtoekologie, Umweltplanung und Veerkehr, UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig (Germany). E-mail: hans.kasperidus@ufz.de
  4. Department Stadtoekologie, Umweltplanung und Veerkehr, UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318 Leipzig (Germany). E-mail: ulrike.weiland@ufz.de
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
20972040
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Environmental Impact Assessment Review; Journal Volume: 27; Journal Issue: 2; Other Information: DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.09.001; PII: S0195-9255(06)00122-3; Copyright (c) 2006 Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands, All rights reserved; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PLANNING; PROPOSALS; RECOMMENDATIONS

Citation Formats

Perdicoulis, A., Hanusch, M., Kasperidus, H.D., and Weiland, U. The handling of causality in SEA guidance. United States: N. p., 2007. Web. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.09.001.
Perdicoulis, A., Hanusch, M., Kasperidus, H.D., & Weiland, U. The handling of causality in SEA guidance. United States. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.09.001.
Perdicoulis, A., Hanusch, M., Kasperidus, H.D., and Weiland, U. Thu . "The handling of causality in SEA guidance". United States. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.09.001.
@article{osti_20972040,
title = {The handling of causality in SEA guidance},
author = {Perdicoulis, A. and Hanusch, M. and Kasperidus, H.D. and Weiland, U.},
abstractNote = {Causality, or the relation of cause and effect, is a fundamental notion in science, planning, and management. It is also a fundamental notion in impact assessment, as it relates action proposals with environmental impacts. Building on recent research about causality in impact assessment, this article turns to Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and examines eleven guidance documents to see whether and how they handle causality. The findings of this research, in line with results from similar research in EIA, indicate a weak handling of causality with regards to instruction, obligation, and theoretical support. The recommendations are to investigate the reasons for the observed trend, as there is no evidence in the guidance documents themselves, and to have the fundamental premise of causality in impact assessment safeguarded in future SEA guidance.},
doi = {10.1016/j.eiar.2006.09.001},
journal = {Environmental Impact Assessment Review},
number = 2,
volume = 27,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Thu Mar 15 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}
  • The Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Espoo Convention came into force on 11 July 2010. This Protocol, to which the European Union is party, gives a legal basis for enhanced attention to human health in the SEA process. In this context, the United Kingdom's (UK's) 2007 Draft Guidance on Health in Strategic Environmental Assessment represents an important early government-led effort to bring health issues and public health considerations more significantly into the SEA process. Since the UK is a worldwide leader in environmental and various other types of impact assessment,more » and since other countries may eventually consider its example in efforts to meet UNECE SEA Protocol requirements, scrutiny of its outputs is warranted. This paper thus examines the UK's Draft Guidance from both HIA academic and practitioner perspectives. First it assesses the extent to which the Draft Guidance reflects recent issues and lessons learned in the academic literature. In order to make the assessment, a meta-analysis of 70 HIA-related peer-reviewed articles was undertaken to extract authors' priority recommendations. These recommendations were subsequently compared with the contents of the Draft Guidance. Secondly, the Draft Guidance was assessed for its accordance with recommendations of the UNECE SEA Protocol background paper written by two HIA practitioners. Overall, the Draft Guidance's accordance with both sets of recommendations was found to be high, with only a few easily-remedied gaps. This evaluation suggests that the UK's Draft Guidance can be a useful starting point in the creation of future guidance on health in SEA in both the UK and other countries.« less
  • With the growing number of horizontal holes being drilled, petroleum geologists must handle increasing amounts of material having greater lateral than vertical extent. This requires novel techniques in description, interpretation, and data manipulation. This paper described the core handling and descriptive techniques used for a heterogeneous 28.6 m horizontal core from the eolian Rotliegende reservoir of the Barque gas field in the United Kingdom southern North Sea. The core is subparallel to structural dip, slowly cutting down stratigraphically but sampling only a limited extent (laterally or vertically) of the reservoir. One facies boundary can be traced for about 12 mmore » along the core, and for a significant proportion of the core, two facies with markedly different reservoir properties occur across the same 10-cm core diameter. The core is unrepresentative of the reservoir, as described from vertical wells, in two ways: the overall lithofacies composition in the core is comparatively biased toward poor-quality (water-laid) facies, and the presence of a thin cemented layer in the normally better quality (eolian) facies markedly decreases their average porosity/permeability. Care must be taken in extrapolating plug data from the core to field models. Apparently, contradictory wireline responses are explained (through calibration to the core and by consideration of the physical basis of petrophysical log responses), allowing the construction of facies models covering the formation around the borehole. 14 refs., 11 figs., 3 tabs.« less
  • A definition of causality, differert from the one currently employed in field theory, is introduced; its relations to the Lorentz group and to relativity theory are clarified. This causality leads to a reduction of the S-matrix of dispersion theory that is not subject to some limitations previously encountered. The mathematical constructions appearing in the course of this reduction are discussed. (auth)