skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Conduct and impact versus direct mitigation

Abstract

The methodology for ex ante market power mitigation of energy bids has recently coalesced around two different approaches: ''conduct and impact'' and ''direct mitigation.'' While both methods share the same aim, there are significant differences between them for participants, ISOs, and the regulators that administer them. (author)

Authors:
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
20864961
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Electricity Journal; Journal Volume: 20; Journal Issue: 1; Other Information: Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; PROPOSALS; MITIGATION; MARKET; ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY; REGULATIONS; GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Citation Formats

Isemonger, Alan G. Conduct and impact versus direct mitigation. United States: N. p., 2007. Web. doi:10.1016/J.TEJ.2006.11.010.
Isemonger, Alan G. Conduct and impact versus direct mitigation. United States. doi:10.1016/J.TEJ.2006.11.010.
Isemonger, Alan G. Mon . "Conduct and impact versus direct mitigation". United States. doi:10.1016/J.TEJ.2006.11.010.
@article{osti_20864961,
title = {Conduct and impact versus direct mitigation},
author = {Isemonger, Alan G.},
abstractNote = {The methodology for ex ante market power mitigation of energy bids has recently coalesced around two different approaches: ''conduct and impact'' and ''direct mitigation.'' While both methods share the same aim, there are significant differences between them for participants, ISOs, and the regulators that administer them. (author)},
doi = {10.1016/J.TEJ.2006.11.010},
journal = {Electricity Journal},
number = 1,
volume = 20,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2007},
month = {Mon Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2007}
}