skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Analytical solution of space charge limited current for spherical and cylindrical objects

Abstract

Analytical solutions for space charge limited currents in collisionless, electron-free sheaths are given for Cartesian, spherical, and cylindrical geometries. Constant current and current density are assumed. Until now, the problem of space charge limited current has not been solved either directly, in terms of series expansions, or numerically, for spherical and cylindrical objects. Analytical results show that the geometry of the system is important for determining the space charge limited current, sheath thickness, and sheath potential profile. This solution method can be used to solve similar nonlinear differential equations.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Physics Department, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta (Turkey)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
20779222
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Applied Physics Letters; Journal Volume: 88; Journal Issue: 18; Other Information: DOI: 10.1063/1.2201469; (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; ANALYTICAL SOLUTION; BOUNDARY LAYERS; CURRENT DENSITY; CYLINDERS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ELECTRIC CURRENTS; ELECTRONS; GEOMETRY; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PLASMA; PLASMA SHEATH; SERIES EXPANSION; SPACE CHARGE; SPHERES; THICKNESS

Citation Formats

Oksuz, L. Analytical solution of space charge limited current for spherical and cylindrical objects. United States: N. p., 2006. Web. doi:10.1063/1.2201469.
Oksuz, L. Analytical solution of space charge limited current for spherical and cylindrical objects. United States. doi:10.1063/1.2201469.
Oksuz, L. Mon . "Analytical solution of space charge limited current for spherical and cylindrical objects". United States. doi:10.1063/1.2201469.
@article{osti_20779222,
title = {Analytical solution of space charge limited current for spherical and cylindrical objects},
author = {Oksuz, L.},
abstractNote = {Analytical solutions for space charge limited currents in collisionless, electron-free sheaths are given for Cartesian, spherical, and cylindrical geometries. Constant current and current density are assumed. Until now, the problem of space charge limited current has not been solved either directly, in terms of series expansions, or numerically, for spherical and cylindrical objects. Analytical results show that the geometry of the system is important for determining the space charge limited current, sheath thickness, and sheath potential profile. This solution method can be used to solve similar nonlinear differential equations.},
doi = {10.1063/1.2201469},
journal = {Applied Physics Letters},
number = 18,
volume = 88,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006},
month = {Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006}
}
  • When particles are injected according to the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) field emission equation, the transmitted current density will transition to the space charge limited (SCL) current density, with increasing applied diode voltage. The actual transmitted current density is the so-called SCL-FN current density. In this work, Barbour's analytic solution for the SCL-FN current density is modified with consideration of injection velocity and also geometric effects, by solving the advanced FN equation with the effective field enhancement factor, the energy conservation equation with an initial velocity term, and Poisson's equation simultaneously. The solution is also extended to the relativistic regime where similarmore » transition process is found. This solution has been verified using particle-in-cell simulation with varying diode voltage, electron injection velocity, and field enhancement factor.« less
  • The solution for space-charge-limited (SCL) currents in electron vacuum diodes with monoenergetic initial velocity is extended to the relativistic regime. Two types of solutions are found: Type I corresponds to zero steady state surface electric field (field emission with high enhancement factor), and Type II corresponds to a finite steady state surface electric field (other emission mechanisms). Our solution compares well to the classical space-charge-limited currents with initial energy and relativistic space-charge limited currents without initial energy in the appropriate limits. The scaling law between the true SCL and the applied voltage is discussed and the two solution types aremore » verified by particle-in-cell simulation.« less
  • For a nonrelativistic electron beam propagating in a cylindrical drift tube, it is shown that the limiting current density does not saturate to the electrostatic one-dimensional (1D) estimate with increasing beam radius. Fully electromagnetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation studies show that beyond a critical aspect ratio, the limiting current density is lower than the 1D electrostatic prediction. The lowering in the limiting current density is found to be due to the transition from the space charge limited to magnetically limited flow. An adaptation of Alfven's single particle trajectory method is used to estimate the magnetically limited current as well as themore » critical radius beyond which the flow is magnetically limited in a drift tube. The predictions are found to be in close agreement with PIC simulations.« less
  • Conjugated polyelectrolytes and related mixed ionic-electronic conductors (MIECs) are being explored for energy applications including solid-state lighting and photovoltaics. Fundamental models of charge injection into MIECs have been primarily developed for MIECs contacted with highly conductive or metal electrodes (MEs), despite many potential applications involving semiconductors. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that an appropriate semiconductor electrode (SE), n-type for electron or p-type of hole injection, can limit injection into MIECs. When the SE is the injecting electrode and is under accumulation, there is little difference from a ME. When the SE acts as the extracting electrode, however, injection into themore » MIEC can be limited because a fraction of any applied bias must support charge depletion in the semiconductor rather than charge injection into the MIEC. In a ME/MIEC/SE system, this can lead to significant asymmetry in current-voltage and injected charge-voltage behavior.« less