skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Recursive parametrization and invariant phases of unitary matrices

Abstract

We present further properties of a previously proposed recursive scheme for parametrization of n-by-n unitary matrices. We show that the factors in the recursive formula may be introduced in any desired order. The method is used to study the invariant phases of unitary matrices. The case of four-by-four unitary matrices is investigated in detail. We also address the question of how to construct symmetric unitary matrices (i.e., unitary matrices U that satisfy the condition U{sub ij}=U{sub ji}) using the recursive approach.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Division of Mathematical Physics, LTH, Lund University, Box 118, S-22100 Lund (Sweden)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
20768716
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Journal of Mathematical Physics; Journal Volume: 47; Journal Issue: 1; Other Information: DOI: 10.1063/1.2159069; (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; ALGEBRA; MATRICES; RECURSION RELATIONS; STANDARD MODEL; UNITARY SYMMETRY

Citation Formats

Jarlskog, C. Recursive parametrization and invariant phases of unitary matrices. United States: N. p., 2006. Web. doi:10.1063/1.2159069.
Jarlskog, C. Recursive parametrization and invariant phases of unitary matrices. United States. doi:10.1063/1.2159069.
Jarlskog, C. Sun . "Recursive parametrization and invariant phases of unitary matrices". United States. doi:10.1063/1.2159069.
@article{osti_20768716,
title = {Recursive parametrization and invariant phases of unitary matrices},
author = {Jarlskog, C.},
abstractNote = {We present further properties of a previously proposed recursive scheme for parametrization of n-by-n unitary matrices. We show that the factors in the recursive formula may be introduced in any desired order. The method is used to study the invariant phases of unitary matrices. The case of four-by-four unitary matrices is investigated in detail. We also address the question of how to construct symmetric unitary matrices (i.e., unitary matrices U that satisfy the condition U{sub ij}=U{sub ji}) using the recursive approach.},
doi = {10.1063/1.2159069},
journal = {Journal of Mathematical Physics},
number = 1,
volume = 47,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2006},
month = {Sun Jan 15 00:00:00 EST 2006}
}
  • We describe a calculation of Jarlskog's determinant in the case of n=4 in detail. Next, we investigate some formulas for invariant phases of unitary matrices and derive some explicit relations for them.
  • The three-flavor mixing matrix can be parameterized by the rephasing invariants {gamma}{sub ijk}=V{sub 1i}V{sub 2j}V{sub 3k}. This formulation brings out the inherent symmetry of the problem and has some appealing features. Examples illustrating the parametrization and applications to quark mixing are presented.
  • The recursion-like mathematical method of dynamic programming, which uses the so-called Principle of Optimality,'' is outlined, and the invariant imbedding techniques used in conjunction with this method are discussed. The method is applied to a multinomial problem, a neutron transport model, and problems in the calculus of variations.
  • We examine the calculation of the critical temperature [ital T][sub [ital c]] for the restoration of a spontaneously broken symmetry. Motivated by a set of recently developed gauge dependence identities, we give a gauge- and parametrization-independent definition of this temperature in terms of the physical mass of the scalar particle as determined by the propagator pole. As an explicit illustration, we consider the Abelian Higgs model in the unitary gauge, where the usual definition of the critical temperature based upon the effective potential leads to an erroneous result. We show how the gauge-invariant definition reproduces the correct result as foundmore » in the renormalizable '' parametrizations.« less