skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Differences between soft collinear effective theory and QCD factorization for B{yields}{pi}{pi} decays

Abstract

We give a detailed description of the differences between the factorization and results derived from SCET and QCDF for decays B{yields}M{sub 1}M{sub 2}. This serves as a reply to the preceding Comment. We disagree with their criticisms.

Authors:
 [1]; ;  [2];  [3]
  1. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125 (United States)
  2. Center for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 (United States)
  3. Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
20713895
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Physical Review. D, Particles Fields; Journal Volume: 72; Journal Issue: 9; Other Information: DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.72.098502; (c) 2005 The American Physical Society; Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS; B MESONS; FACTORIZATION; HADRONIC PARTICLE DECAY; PIONS; QUANTUM CHROMODYNAMICS

Citation Formats

Bauer, Christian W., Pirjol, Dan, Stewart, Iain W., and Rothstein, Ira Z. Differences between soft collinear effective theory and QCD factorization for B{yields}{pi}{pi} decays. United States: N. p., 2005. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.098502.
Bauer, Christian W., Pirjol, Dan, Stewart, Iain W., & Rothstein, Ira Z. Differences between soft collinear effective theory and QCD factorization for B{yields}{pi}{pi} decays. United States. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.098502.
Bauer, Christian W., Pirjol, Dan, Stewart, Iain W., and Rothstein, Ira Z. Tue . "Differences between soft collinear effective theory and QCD factorization for B{yields}{pi}{pi} decays". United States. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.098502.
@article{osti_20713895,
title = {Differences between soft collinear effective theory and QCD factorization for B{yields}{pi}{pi} decays},
author = {Bauer, Christian W. and Pirjol, Dan and Stewart, Iain W. and Rothstein, Ira Z.},
abstractNote = {We give a detailed description of the differences between the factorization and results derived from SCET and QCDF for decays B{yields}M{sub 1}M{sub 2}. This serves as a reply to the preceding Comment. We disagree with their criticisms.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevD.72.098502},
journal = {Physical Review. D, Particles Fields},
number = 9,
volume = 72,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Nov 01 00:00:00 EST 2005},
month = {Tue Nov 01 00:00:00 EST 2005}
}
  • B{yields}K{pi} and related decays are studied in the heavy quark limit of QCD using the soft collinear effective theory (SCET). We focus on results that follow solely from integrating out the scale m{sub b}, without expanding the amplitudes for the physics at smaller scales such as {alpha}{sub s}({radical}(E{sub {pi}}{lambda}{sub QCD})). The reduction in the number of hadronic parameters in SCET leads to multiple predictions without the need of SU(3). We find that the CP-asymmetry in B{sup -}{yields}{pi}{sup 0}K{sup -} should have a similar magnitude and the same sign as the well measured asymmetry in B{sup 0}{yields}{pi}{sup +}K{sup -}. Our predictionmore » for Br(K{sup +}{pi}{sup -}) exceeds the current experimental value at the 2{sigma} level. We also use our results to determine the corrections to the Lipkin and CP-asymmetry sum rules in the standard model and find them to be quite small, thus sharpening their utility as a tool to look for new physics.« less
  • We analyze the 5{sigma} difference between the CP asymmetries of the B{sup 0{yields}}K{sup +{pi}-} and B{sup +{yields}}K{sup +{pi}0} decays within the soft collinear effective theory. We find that in the standard model, such a big difference cannot be achieved. We classify then the requirements for the possible New Physics models, which can be responsible for the experimental results. As an example of a New Physics model we study minimal supersymmetric models, and find that the measured asymmetry can be obtained with nonminimal flavor violation.
  • We provide the analysis of charmless two-body B{yields}VP decays under the framework of the soft collinear effective theory (SCET), where V(P) denotes a light vector (pseudoscalar) meson. Besides the leading power contributions, some power corrections (chiraly enhanced penguins) are also taken into account. Using the current available B{yields}PP and B{yields}VP experimental data on branching fractions and CP asymmetry variables, we find two kinds of solutions in {chi}{sup 2} fit for the 16 nonperturbative inputs which are essential in the 87 B{yields}PP and B{yields}VP decay channels. Chiraly enhanced penguins can change several charming penguins sizably, since they share the same topology.more » However, most of the other nonperturbative inputs and predictions on branching ratios and CP asymmetries are not changed too much. With the two sets of inputs, we predict the branching fractions and CP asymmetries of other modes especially B{sub s}{yields}VP decays. The agreements and differences with results in QCD factorization and perturbative QCD approach are analyzed. We also study the time-dependent CP asymmetries in channels with CP eigenstates in the final states and some other channels such as B{sup 0}/B{sup 0}{yields}{pi}{sup {+-}}{rho}{sup {+-}} and B{sub s}{sup 0}/B{sub s}{sup 0}{yields}K{sup {+-}}K*{sup {+-}}. In the perturbative QCD approach, the (S-P)(S+P) penguins in annihilation diagrams play an important role. Although they have the same topology with charming penguins in SCET, there are many differences between the two objects in weak phases, magnitudes, strong phases, and factorization properties.« less
  • Motivated by the recent experimental data, we have revisited the B{yields}{pi}K,{pi}{pi} decays in the framework of QCD factorization, with inclusion of the important strong penguin corrections of order {alpha}{sub s}{sup 2} induced by b{yields}Dg*g* (D=d or s and g* denotes an off-shell gluon) transitions. We find that these higher order strong penguin contributions can provide {approx}30% enhancement to the penguin-dominated B{yields}{pi}K decay rates, and such an enhancement can improve the consistency between the theoretical predictions and the experimental data significantly, while for the tree-dominated B{yields}{pi}{pi} decays, these higher order contributions play only a minor role. When these strong penguin contributionsmore » are summed, only a small strong phase remains and the direct CP asymmetries get small corrections. We also find that patterns of the ratios between the CP-averaged branching fractions remain nearly unaffected even after including these higher order corrections and the {pi}K puzzle still persists. Our results may indicate that to resolve the puzzle one would have to resort to new physics contributions in the electroweak penguin sector as found by Buras et al.« less
  • We study O({alpha}{sub s}{sup 2}{beta}{sub 0}) perturbative corrections to matrix elements entering two-body exclusive decays of the form B{yields}{pi}{pi}, {pi}K in the QCD factorization formalism, including chirally enhanced power corrections, and discuss the effect of these corrections on direct CP asymmetries, which receive their first contribution at O({alpha}{sub s}). We find that the O({alpha}{sub s}{sup 2}{beta}{sub 0}) corrections are often as large as the O({alpha}{sub s}) corrections. We find large uncertainties due to renormalization scale dependence as well as poor knowledge of the nonperturbative parameters. We assess the effect of the perturbative corrections on the direct CP violation parameters ofmore » B{sup 0}{yields}{pi}{sup +}{pi}{sup -}.« less