skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The pros and cons of risk communication: A project manager`s guide

Abstract

Communicating risk is in itself a risky, yet essential, part of any successful hazardous waste project`s community relations strategy. Essential, because no project requiring public involvement can achieve success without effective communication of technical data and associated risks. Risky, because the stakes are high, the public and media are often contentious, and their science and engineering are difficult to relate to non-technical audiences. Given that communicating project risks cannot be avoided, or are avoided at one`s own peril, project managers lacking mastery of communication skills can build winning strategies by heeding the following ``pros`` and ``cons`` of risk communication.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Blasland, Bouck and Lee, Inc., Syracuse, NY (United States)
Publication Date:
OSTI Identifier:
205334
Report Number(s):
CONF-951139-
TRN: IM9615%%114
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: 16. hazardous waste conference and exhibition: new frontiers in hazardous waste, Washington, DC (United States), 6-8 Nov 1995; Other Information: PBD: 1995; Related Information: Is Part Of Superfund 16: Conference and exhibition proceedings. Volume 1; PB: 828 p.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
29 ENERGY PLANNING AND POLICY; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RECOMMENDATIONS; PUBLIC RELATIONS

Citation Formats

Perry, S.D. The pros and cons of risk communication: A project manager`s guide. United States: N. p., 1995. Web.
Perry, S.D. The pros and cons of risk communication: A project manager`s guide. United States.
Perry, S.D. Sun . "The pros and cons of risk communication: A project manager`s guide". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_205334,
title = {The pros and cons of risk communication: A project manager`s guide},
author = {Perry, S.D.},
abstractNote = {Communicating risk is in itself a risky, yet essential, part of any successful hazardous waste project`s community relations strategy. Essential, because no project requiring public involvement can achieve success without effective communication of technical data and associated risks. Risky, because the stakes are high, the public and media are often contentious, and their science and engineering are difficult to relate to non-technical audiences. Given that communicating project risks cannot be avoided, or are avoided at one`s own peril, project managers lacking mastery of communication skills can build winning strategies by heeding the following ``pros`` and ``cons`` of risk communication.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 1995},
month = {Sun Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 1995}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • In December 1993, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released its final rule that sets for the details for requirements to sell reformulated gasoline (RFG) in certain ozone non-attainment areas. At the same time, EPA also issued a proposed rule to require that 30% of the oxygen required in RFG be based on a renewable oxygenate. Renewables include ethanol and its ether derivatives such as ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE). The RFG rule is a final rule, while the Renewable Oxygenate Requirement (ROR) rule is a proposed rule yet to be finalized and subject to revision. Included in this papermore » are brief reviews of Ashland petroleum Company`s ethanol usage, oxygenated fuel and reformulated gasoline blending economics, and some comments on the EPA proposed renewable oxygenate requirement.« less
  • The energy crisis of the 1970s has lead to a demand for increased regulation of the energy sector by certain governments for several reasons. Increased regulation is viewed as a means of assuring access to alternative energy sources for all people. This is the welfare argument. Regulation is also viewed as a means of rationalizing the system of energy delivery. This is the efficiency argument. Under this traditional view of regulation the prices and profits of the regulated energy industry are expected to be lower and the allocation of energy sources more efficient. However, this traditional view of alternative energymore » source regulation is not without flaw. Firms of the energy producing industry can use several methods to ''capture'' established regulatory agencies and ''force'' them to ''regulate'' the dissatisfaction of the general public rather than the behavior of the firms. As a result, regulatory agencies can formulate decisions that are approximate to what the regulated energy industry desires instead of what the public expects. This paper will apply the arguments of the capture theory and the theory of political-economy for regulatory agencies in the alternative energy sources sector. Further, it will analyze a firm's behavior under uncertainty about demand and cost conditions. These conditions make it difficult for regulatory agencies to force a monopoly to make competitive investment and output decisions. Finally, it will discuss some of the problems associated with cost-benefit analysis which is widely used by regulatory agencies in their decision-making process.« less
  • The design of cryogenic linacs is a challenging engineering task; however, significant improvements in accelerator performance are possible. Resistive power losses may be reduced by a factor of four or greater. Greater flexibility is possible in thermal management as a result of substantial increases in thermal conductivity for certain materials. Radio frequency structures may be an order of magnitude more stable in terms of frequency shifts due to thermal transients resulting from very small coefficients of thermal expansion at cryogenic temperatures. Significant engineering problems must be addressed, such as the design of effective rf contacts that will not be affectedmore » by thermal cycling and the design of cryogenic mechanisms and dynamic components, such as frequency tuners, that operate reliably at cryogenic operating temperatures. The areas of high-power sparking and multipactoring have not yet been experimentally addressed. Both Los Alamos, Grumman Aerospace Corporation, and Boeing Corporation have built or are building and testing cryogenic accelerator structures. This paper will review the advances made in cryogenic technology applied to radio frequency quadrupole (RFQ) and drift tube linac (DTL) structures and will discuss the advantages and engineering challenges that these linacs present.« less
  • There is a new magnetic alloy called Finemet which has very constant {mu}'{sub p}Qf up to {approximately} 2 kG and is very stable at high magnet flux density and temperature. It may be a good can-didate for high-gradient rf cavities. However, it has a rather low quality factor and is therefore very lossy. We compare the pros and cons of Finemet versus the common ferrite, when used in low-energy accelerating cavities, insertion for space-charge compensation, and barrier cavities.