Energy flexibility, through short-term demand-side management (DSM) and energy storage technologies, is now seen as a major key to balancing the fluctuating supply in different energy grids with the energy demand of buildings. This is especially important when considering the intermittent nature of ever-growing renewable energy production, as well as the increasing dynamics of electricity demand in buildings. This paper provides a holistic review of (1) data-driven energy flexibility key performance indicators (KPIs) for buildings in the operational phase and (2) open datasets that can be used for testing energy flexibility KPIs. The review identifies a total of 48 data-driven energy flexibility KPIs from 87 recent and relevant publications. These KPIs were categorized and analyzed according to their type, complexity, scope, key stakeholders, data requirement, baseline requirement, resolution, and popularity. Moreover, 330 building datasets were collected and evaluated. Of those, 16 were deemed adequate to feature building performing demand response or building-to-grid (B2G) services. The DSM strategy, building scope, grid type, control strategy, needed data features, and usability of these selected 16 datasets were analyzed. This review reveals future opportunities to address limitations in the existing literature: (1) developing new data-driven methodologies to specifically evaluate different energy flexibility strategies and B2G services of existing buildings; (2) developing baseline-free KPIs that could be calculated from easily accessible building sensors and meter data; (3) devoting non-engineering efforts to promote building energy flexibility, standardizing data-driven energy flexibility quantification and verification processes; and (4) curating and analyzing datasets with proper description for energy flexibility assessm.
Li, Han, et al. "Data-driven key performance indicators and datasets for building energy flexibility: A review and perspectives." Applied Energy, vol. 343, May. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121217
Li, Han, Johra, Hicham, de Andrade Pereira, Flavia, et al., "Data-driven key performance indicators and datasets for building energy flexibility: A review and perspectives," Applied Energy 343 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121217
@article{osti_1984243,
author = {Li, Han and Johra, Hicham and de Andrade Pereira, Flavia and Hong, Tianzhen and Le Dréau, Jérôme and Maturo, Anthony and Wei, Mingjun and Liu, Yapan and Saberi-Derakhtenjani, Ali and Nagy, Zoltan and others},
title = {Data-driven key performance indicators and datasets for building energy flexibility: A review and perspectives},
annote = {Energy flexibility, through short-term demand-side management (DSM) and energy storage technologies, is now seen as a major key to balancing the fluctuating supply in different energy grids with the energy demand of buildings. This is especially important when considering the intermittent nature of ever-growing renewable energy production, as well as the increasing dynamics of electricity demand in buildings. This paper provides a holistic review of (1) data-driven energy flexibility key performance indicators (KPIs) for buildings in the operational phase and (2) open datasets that can be used for testing energy flexibility KPIs. The review identifies a total of 48 data-driven energy flexibility KPIs from 87 recent and relevant publications. These KPIs were categorized and analyzed according to their type, complexity, scope, key stakeholders, data requirement, baseline requirement, resolution, and popularity. Moreover, 330 building datasets were collected and evaluated. Of those, 16 were deemed adequate to feature building performing demand response or building-to-grid (B2G) services. The DSM strategy, building scope, grid type, control strategy, needed data features, and usability of these selected 16 datasets were analyzed. This review reveals future opportunities to address limitations in the existing literature: (1) developing new data-driven methodologies to specifically evaluate different energy flexibility strategies and B2G services of existing buildings; (2) developing baseline-free KPIs that could be calculated from easily accessible building sensors and meter data; (3) devoting non-engineering efforts to promote building energy flexibility, standardizing data-driven energy flexibility quantification and verification processes; and (4) curating and analyzing datasets with proper description for energy flexibility assessm.},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121217},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1984243},
journal = {Applied Energy},
issn = {ISSN 0306-2619},
volume = {343},
place = {United States},
publisher = {Elsevier},
year = {2023},
month = {05}}
Vazquez-Canteli, Jose R.; Henze, Gregor; Nagy, Zoltan
Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportationhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3408308.3427604
Nagy, Zoltan; Vázquez-Canteli, José R.; Dey, Sourav
Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportationhttps://doi.org/10.1145/3486611.3492226