Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Nonlinear burn control in ITER using adaptive allocation of actuators with uncertain dynamics

Journal Article · · Nuclear Fusion

Abstract ITER will be the first tokamak to sustain a fusion-producing, or burning, plasma. If the plasma temperature were to inadvertently rise in this burning regime, the positive correlation between temperature and the fusion reaction rate would establish a destabilizing positive feedback loop. Careful regulation of the plasma’s temperature and density, or burn control, is required to prevent these potentially reactor-damaging thermal excursions, neutralize disturbances and improve performance. In this work, a Lyapunov-based burn controller is designed using a full zero-dimensional nonlinear model. An adaptive estimator manages destabilizing uncertainties in the plasma confinement properties and the particle recycling conditions (caused by plasma–wall interactions). The controller regulates the plasma density with requests for deuterium and tritium particle injections. In ITER-like plasmas, the fusion-born alpha particles will primarily heat the plasma electrons, resulting in different electron and ion temperatures in the core. By considering separate response models for the electron and ion energies, the proposed controller can independently regulate the electron and ion temperatures by requesting that different amounts of auxiliary power be delivered to the electrons and ions. These two commands for a specific control effort (electron and ion heating) are sent to an actuator allocation module that optimally maps them to the heating actuators available to ITER: an electron cyclotron heating system (20 MW), an ion cyclotron heating system (20 MW), and two neutral beam injectors (16.5 MW each). Two different actuator allocators are presented in this work. The first actuator allocator finds the optimal mapping by solving a convex quadratic program that includes actuator saturation and rate limits. It is nonadaptive and assumes that the mapping between the commanded control efforts and the allocated actuators (i.e. the effector model) contains no uncertainties. The second actuator allocation module has an adaptive estimator to handle uncertainties in the effector model. This uncertainty includes actuator efficiencies, the fractions of neutral beam heating that are deposited into the plasma electrons and ions, and the tritium concentration of the fueling pellets. Furthermore, the adaptive allocator considers actuator dynamics (actuation lag) that contain uncertainty. This adaptive allocation algorithm is more computationally efficient than the aforementioned nonadaptive allocator because it is computed using dynamic update laws so that finding the solution to a static optimization problem is not required at every time step. A simulation study assesses the performance of the proposed adaptive burn controller augmented with each of the actuator allocation modules.

Research Organization:
Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
DOE Contract Number:
SC0010661
OSTI ID:
1979402
Journal Information:
Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 62, Issue 2; ISSN 0029-5515
Publisher:
IOP Science
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (24)

Nonlinear control and online optimization of the burn condition in ITER via heating, isotopic fueling and impurity injection journal August 2014
Nonlinear burn condition control in tokamaks using isotopic fuel tailoring journal July 2015
Nonlinear burn control using in-vessel coils and isotopic fueling in ITER journal November 2017
Nonlinear Adaptive Burn Control of Two-Temperature Tokamak Plasmas conference December 2019
Nonlinear Adaptive Burn Control and Optimal Control Allocation of Over-Actuated Two-Temperature Plasmas conference July 2020
Overview of recent developments in pellet injection for ITER journal August 2012
Actuator and diagnostic requirements of the ITER Plasma Control System journal December 2012
Control allocation—A survey journal May 2013
Developments on actuator management, plasma state reconstruction, and control on ASDEX Upgrade journal October 2021
Integrated Control and Actuator Management Strategies for Internal Inductance and Normalized Beta Regulation journal September 2021
Resolving actuator redundancy—optimal control vs. control allocation journal January 2005
Optimizing adaptive control allocation with actuator dynamics conference January 2007
Chapter 2: Plasma confinement and transport journal December 1999
Modelling of ICRF heating in DEMO with special emphasis on bulk ion heating conference January 2015
Overview of the design of the ITER heating neutral beam injectors journal February 2017
Assessment of the burning-plasma operational space in ITER by using a control-oriented core-SOL-divertor model journal October 2021
Robust nonlinear burn control in ITER to handle uncertainties in the fuel-line concentrations journal July 2019
Density control in ITER: an iterative learning control and robust control approach journal December 2017
Control Allocation for Over-actuated Systems conference June 2006
Pellet fuelling and control of burning plasmas in ITER journal May 2007
Evaluation of Be fluxes into the ITER tokamak plasma due to sputtering of the first wall by D and T atoms leaving the plasma journal March 2020
Receding-horizon optimal control of the current profile evolution during the ramp-up phase of a tokamak discharge journal January 2011
Profile control simulations and experiments on TCV: a controller test environment and results using a model-based predictive controller journal October 2017
Nonlinear Burn Control in Tokamak Fusion Reactors via Output Feedback journal January 2014