skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Economic and Environmental Analysis to Evaluate the Potential Value of Co-Optima Diesel Bioblendstocks to Petroleum Refiners

Journal Article · · Fuel

The U.S. petroleum refining sector is undergoing a period of historic transformation, catalyzed by the decarbonization of the U.S. economy. Diesel-boiling-range bioblendstocks have gained traction, owing to their superior fuel properties and environmental performance as compared to traditional petroleum fuels. This work couples refinery linear programming models with life cycle assessment to quantify the potential economic and environmental benefits, and trade-offs, of blending diesel-boiling-range bioblendstocks at petroleum refineries. Linear programming models were developed in Aspen Process Industry Modeling Systems (PIMS) for three representative petroleum refinery configurations of differing complexity. Seven diesel-boiling-range bioblendstocks: 4-butoxyheptane, 5-ethyl-4-propylnonane, soy biodiesel, sludge hydrothermal liquefaction diesel, polyoxymethylene ethers, renewable diesel, and hexyl hexanoate, were investigated to identify key fuel properties that influence refineries' economics and to track the effect of adding bioblendstocks on refinery-wide cradle-to-gate greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. These analyses considered blending levels from 10 to 30 vol% and fuel demand projections over the period 2040 to 2050. This analysis determines that bioblendstock sulfur content and cetane number are the primary fuel attributes with the potential to provide value to refiners. Life cycle assessment results indicate that the use of diesel-boiling-range bioblendstocks can reduce cradle-to-gate refinery GHG emissions by up to ~ 40 % relative to conventional refinery operations when considering carbon uptake in the supply chain of the bioblendstock. Refinery-wide marginal GHG abatement costs range from 120 to 3,600 USD2016/metric tons carbon dioxide equivalent avoided across the scenarios evaluated. Reducing the price of bioblendstocks is identified as a key to their adoption.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Sustainable Transportation Office. Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO); USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Vehicle Technologies Office (EE-3V); Co-Optimization of Fuels & Engines (Co-Optima) Project
DOE Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1901935
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5100-84688; MainId:85461; UUID:4f7bf7bb-8914-4cdd-b4e2-722d4d54623f; MainAdminID:68146
Journal Information:
Fuel, Vol. 333, Issue Part 1
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (19)

Co-Optimization of Fuels & Engines: Fuel Blendstocks with the Potential to Optimize Future Gasoline Engine Performance; Identification of Five Chemical Families for Detailed Evaluation report April 2018
Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations and Trends of Selected Fuel Economy-Enhancing Biomass-Derived Blendstocks journal November 2017
Top Ten Blendstocks For Turbocharged Gasoline Engines: Bioblendstocks With Potential to Deliver the for Highest Engine Efficiency report September 2019
Potential economic values of low-vapor-pressure gasoline-range bio-blendstocks: Property estimation and blending optimization journal August 2021
Model-based real-time optimization of automotive gasoline blending operations journal February 2000
Measuring and predicting the vapor pressure of gasoline containing oxygenates journal May 2019
Distillation Curves for Alcohol−Gasoline Blends journal April 2010
Screening of Potential Biomass-Derived Streams as Fuel Blendstocks for Mixing Controlled Compression Ignition Combustion conference April 2019
A review of refinery complexity applications journal January 2017
Expansion of the Petroleum Refinery Life Cycle Inventory Model to Support Characterization of a Full Suite of Commonly Tracked Impact Potentials journal February 2019
Criteria Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gases Emissions from U.S. Refineries Allocated to Refinery Products journal May 2019
Summary of Expansions and Updates in GREET® 2020 report October 2020
Model to Investigate Energy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Implications of Refining Petroleum: Impacts of Crude Quality and Refinery Configuration journal December 2012
Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products: Implications for Life-Cyde energy use and emission inventory of petroleum transportation fuels journal January 2004
Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at U.S. Refineries journal June 2014
Mining Available Data from the United States Environmental Protection Agency to Support Rapid Life Cycle Inventory Modeling of Chemical Manufacturing journal August 2016
Using national inventories for estimating environmental impacts of products from industrial sectors: a case study of ethanol and gasoline journal February 2015
Life Cycle Assessment of Gasoline Blending Options journal July 2003
Environmental, Economic, and Scalability Considerations of Selected Bio-Derived Blendstocks for Mixing-Controlled Compression Ignition Engines journal May 2022