Skip to main content
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Achieving Integrated Daylighting and Electric Lighting Systems: Current State of the Art and Needed Research

Journal Article · · Energies
DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/en14133833· OSTI ID:1812942
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. BATTELLE (PACIFIC NW LAB)
  2. University of California, Berkeley
  3. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

This paper presents the results of a multi-disciplinary scoping study, the goals of which were to see the seamless integration and application of light in buildings, regardless of source, that is purposely modulated to illuminate surfaces and designed in a way that is comfortable, healthy, pleasing, cost effective, and energy efficient. The scoping study was performed in order to set the stage for transforming the design and realization of lighting systems integration (daylight and electric). This, in turn, will support achieving the the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Technologies Office (BTO) long-term energy savings goals. Holistic lighting systems of the future should include components that are adaptable to change, resilient to disruption, and robust. The system of codes, standards, guidelines, and contracts employed to design and implement lighting systems should be structured to help them to flourish, rather than being barriers to realization. Finally, the research thrusts and mechanisms should be engaged with these goals in mind. While integrated lighting systems may reduce lighting energy use in buildings, a broader web of non-energy impacts affecting occupant’s overall health, comfort, and satisfaction may also guide technology investment goals when the entire lighting systems lifecycle is considered. Daylighting systems are separated from electric lighting systems, and both are characteristically detached from other systems such as safety, security, communications, and information systems. Being disconnected from the inputs and outputs of other building systems precludes the ability to acquire and utilize information about occupation, status of systems, and interior and exterior environmental conditions. The outcome of this separation is that the standard building is not fulfilling the potential for creating dynamic and holistic lighting for building occupants.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Energy Efficiency Office. Building Technologies Office
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
OSTI ID:
1812942
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-162962
Journal Information:
Energies, Vol. 14, Issue 13
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (32)

A comprehensive approach to the integration of daylight and electric light in buildings January 1984
Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras July 2006
VCP and UGR Glare Evaluation Systems: A Look Back and a Way Forward February 2005
Evaluating a New Suite of Luminance-Based Design Metrics for Predicting Human Visual Comfort in Offices with Daylight August 2015
The Effect of Luminance Distribution Patterns on Occupant Preference in a Daylit Office Environment October 2010
Monitored lighting energy savings from dimmable lighting controls in The New York Times Headquarters Building January 2014
Sensitivity Analysis of Glare Rating Metrics October 2005
Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics November 2018
The Effect of a Pre-Trial Range Demonstration on Subjective Evaluations Using Category Rating of Discomfort Due to Glare July 2019
Toward a Definition of Circadian Light January 2011
Sources of Error in HDRI for Luminance Measurement: A Review of the Literature March 2020
Development of new daylight glare analysis methodology using absolute glare factor and relative glare factor September 2013
Lighting energy savings potential of split-pane electrochromic windows controlled for daylighting with visual comfort June 2013
Fifty percent energy savings with automatic lighting controls January 1993
Circadian light February 2010
Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting June 2002
Light suppresses melatonin secretion in humans December 1980
Energy impact of human health and wellness lighting recommendations for office and classroom applications November 2020
Power Analysis, Sample Size, and Assessment of Statistical Assumptions—Improving the Evidential Value of Lighting Research January 2019
Light as a circadian stimulus for architectural lighting December 2016
A Critical Investigation of Common Lighting Design Metrics for Predicting Human Visual Comfort in Offices with Daylight February 2014
Lighting Research Today: The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same May 2019
Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age January 2014
Measuring Discomfort from Glare: Recommendations for Good Practice September 2020
High dynamic range photogrammetry for synchronous luminance and geometry measurement August 2012
Inferior Retinal Light Exposure Is More Effective than Superior Retinal Exposure in Suppressing Melatonin in Humans February 2003
Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals May 2013
Improving the quality of high dynamic range images August 2010
Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics January 2019
Daylight metrics and energy savings September 2009
Energy Saving Potential for Integrated Daylighting and Electric Lighting Design via User-Driven Solutions: a Literature Review June 2019
A Case Study Addressing the Benefits of Integrated Solutions for Daylighting and Electric Lighting in the Retail Sector January 2019