Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models

Meehl, Gerald A.; Senior, Catherine A.; Eyring, Veronika; Flato, Gregory; Lamarque, Jean-Francois; Stouffer, Ronald J.; Taylor, Karl E.; Schlund, Manuel

doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1981

Title: Context for interpreting equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response from the CMIP6 Earth system models

Journal Article · Wed Jun 24 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · Science Advances

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba1981· OSTI ID:1670779

^[1];

^[2];

^[3];

^[4];

^[1];

^[5];

^[6];

^[7]

National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States)
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter (United Kingdom)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen (Germany); University of Bremen (Germany)
Canadian Centre for Modelling and Analysis, Victoria (Canada)
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (United States)
PCMDI, Livermore, CA (United States)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen (Germany)

For the current generation of earth system models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), the range of equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS, a hypothetical value of global warming at equilibrium for a doubling of CO2) is 1.8°C to 5.6°C, the largest of any generation of models dating to the 1990s. Meanwhile, the range of transient climate response (TCR, the surface temperature warming around the time of CO2doubling in a 1% per year CO2increase simulation) for the CMIP6 models of 1.7°C (1.3°C to 3.0°C) is only slightly larger than for the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Here we review and synthesize the latest developments in ECS and TCR values in CMIP, compile possible reasons for the current values as supplied by the modeling groups, and highlight future directions. Cloud feedbacks and cloud-aerosol interactions are the most likely contributors to the high values and increased range of ECS in CMIP6.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO (United States); Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER); USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)

Grant/Contract Number:: 89243018SSC000007; AC52-07NA27344

OSTI ID:: 1670779

Alternate ID(s):: OSTI ID: 1785916

Report Number(s):: LLNL-JRNL-812553

Journal Information:: Science Advances, Vol. 6, Issue 26; ISSN 2375-2548

Publisher:: AAASCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (60)

Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models Tokarska, Katarzyna B.; Stolpe, Martin B.; Sippel, Sebastian Science Advances, Vol. 6, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz9549	journal	March 2020
Climate sensitivity due to increased CO2: experiments with a coupled atmosphere and ocean general circulation model Washington, Warren M.; Meehl, Gerald A. Climate Dynamics, Vol. 4, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00207397	journal	June 1989
Energy budget constraints on climate sensitivity in light of inconstant climate feedbacks Armour, Kyle C. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 7, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3278	journal	April 2017
Probabilistic climate change projections for CO ₂ stabilization profiles Knutti, Reto Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 32, Issue 20 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023294	journal	January 2005
Emergent constraints on Earth’s transient and equilibrium response to doubled CO2 from post-1970s global warming Jiménez-de-la-Cuesta, Diego; Mauritsen, Thorsten Nature Geoscience, Vol. 12, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0463-y	journal	October 2019
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization Eyring, Veronika; Bony, Sandrine; Meehl, Gerald A. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 9, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016	journal	January 2016
High Climate Sensitivity in the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) Gettelman, A.; Hannay, C.; Bacmeister, J. T. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 46, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083978	journal	July 2019
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity Estimated by Equilibrating Climate Models Rugenstein, Maria; Bloch‐Johnson, Jonah; Gregory, Jonathan Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083898	journal	February 2020
Climate Response Times: Dependence on Climate Sensitivity and Ocean Mixing Hansen, J.; Russell, G.; Lacis, A. Science, Vol. 229, Issue 4716 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.229.4716.857	journal	August 1985
A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity Gregory, J. M. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 31, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018747	journal	January 2004
Externally Forced and Internally Generated Decadal Climate Variability Associated with the Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation Meehl, Gerald A.; Hu, Aixue; Arblaster, Julie M. Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00548.1	journal	September 2013
Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models: FORCING IN CMIP5 CLIMATE MODELS Forster, Piers M.; Andrews, Timothy; Good, Peter Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 118, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50174	journal	February 2013
Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation Forster, Piers M.; Maycock, Amanda C.; McKenna, Christine M. Nature Climate Change, Vol. 10, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0	journal	December 2019
Inference of Climate Sensitivity from Analysis of Earth's Energy Budget Forster, Piers M. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Vol. 44, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105156	journal	June 2016
Seasonal oceanic heat transports computed from an atmospheric model Russell, Gary L.; Miller, James R.; Tsang, Lie-Ching Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, Vol. 9, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0265(85)90022-3	journal	August 1985
The Dependence of Global Cloud and Lapse Rate Feedbacks on the Spatial Structure of Tropical Pacific Warming Andrews, Timothy; Webb, Mark J. Journal of Climate, Vol. 31, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0087.1	journal	January 2018
Transient Temperature Changes Due to Increasing CO ₂ Using Simple Models Siegenthaler, U.; Oeschger, H. Annals of Glaciology, Vol. 5 https://doi.org/10.3189/1984AoG5-1-153-159	journal	January 1984
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity: Is It Accurate to Use a Slab Ocean Model? Danabasoglu, Gokhan; Gent, Peter R. Journal of Climate, Vol. 22, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2596.1	journal	May 2009
Analytical solution for the effect of increasing CO2 on global mean temperature Wigley, T. M. L.; Schlesinger, M. E. Nature, Vol. 315, Issue 6021 https://doi.org/10.1038/315649a0	journal	June 1985
Time-Varying Climate Sensitivity from Regional Feedbacks Armour, Kyle C.; Bitz, Cecilia M.; Roe, Gerard H. Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00544.1	journal	July 2013
Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming Friedrich, Tobias; Timmermann, Axel; Tigchelaar, Michelle Science Advances, Vol. 2, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501923	journal	November 2016
UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model Sellar, Alistair A.; Jones, Colin G.; Mulcahy, Jane P. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739	journal	December 2019
Transient Responses of a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model to Gradual Changes of Atmospheric CO2. Part I. Annual Mean Response Manabe, S.; Stouffer, R. J.; Spelman, M. J. Journal of Climate, Vol. 4, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1991)004<0785:TROACO>2.0.CO;2	journal	August 1991
How cold was the Last Glacial Maximum? Schneider von Deimling, Thomas; Ganopolski, Andrey; Held, Hermann Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 33, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026484	journal	January 2006
The time-dependence of climate sensitivity Senior, Catherine A.; Mitchell, John F. B. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, Issue 17 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011373	journal	September 2000
Developments in the MPI‐M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI‐ESM1.2) and Its Response to Increasing CO ₂ Mauritsen, Thorsten; Bader, Jürgen; Becker, Tobias Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001400	journal	April 2019
Equilibrium- and Transient-State Dependencies of Climate Sensitivity: Are They Important for Climate Projections? Geoffroy, Olivier; Saint-Martin, David Journal of Climate, Vol. 33, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0248.1	journal	January 2020
Interpretation of Cloud-Climate Feedback as Produced by 14 Atmospheric General Circulation Models Cess, R. D.; Potter, G. L.; Blanchet, J. P. Science, Vol. 245, Issue 4917 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4917.513	journal	August 1989
Twentieth century climate model response and climate sensitivity Kiehl, Jeffrey T. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 34, Issue 22 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031383	journal	January 2007
Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Temperature Reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum Schmittner, A.; Urban, N. M.; Shakun, J. D. Science, Vol. 334, Issue 6061 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203513	journal	November 2011
The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution Golaz, Jean‐Christophe; Caldwell, Peter M.; Van Roekel, Luke P. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001603	journal	July 2019
Description and basic evaluation of simulated mean state, internal variability, and climate sensitivity in MIROC6 Tatebe, Hiroaki; Ogura, Tomoo; Nitta, Tomoko Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2727-2019	journal	January 2019
Forcings, Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity in HadGEM3‐GC3.1 and UKESM1 Andrews, Timothy; Andrews, Martin B.; Bodas‐Salcedo, Alejandro Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001866	journal	December 2019
Feedback temperature dependence determines the risk of high warming: FEEDBACK TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE Bloch-Johnson, Jonah; Pierrehumbert, Raymond T.; Abbot, Dorian S. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 42, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064240	journal	June 2015
Structure and Performance of GFDL's CM4.0 Climate Model Held, I. M.; Guo, H.; Adcroft, A. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001829	journal	November 2019
The Role of Climate Sensitivity and Ocean Heat Uptake on AOGCM Transient Temperature Response Raper, Sarah C. B.; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Stouffer, Ronald J. Journal of Climate, Vol. 15, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0124:TROCSA>2.0.CO;2	journal	January 2002
The Meteorological Research Institute Earth System Model Version 2.0, MRI-ESM2.0: Description and Basic Evaluation of the Physical Component Yukimoto, Seiji; Kawai, Hideaki; Koshiro, Tsuyoshi Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. Ser. II, Vol. 97, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2019-051	journal	January 2019
Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms Hansen, J.; Lacis, A.; Rind, D. Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Vol. 29 https://doi.org/10.1029/GM029p0130	book	January 1984
Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models Zelinka, Mark D.; Myers, Timothy A.; McCoy, Daniel T. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782	journal	January 2020
Seasonal cycle experiment on the climate sensitivity due to a doubling of CO ₂ with an atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a simple mixed-layer ocean model Washington, Warren M.; Meehl, Gerald A. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 89, Issue D6 https://doi.org/10.1029/JD089iD06p09475	journal	January 1984
Intercomparison makes for a better climate model Meehl, Gerald A.; Boer, George J.; Covey, Curt Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, Vol. 78, Issue 41 https://doi.org/10.1029/97EO00276	journal	January 1997
The Dependence of Radiative Forcing and Feedback on Evolving Patterns of Surface Temperature Change in Climate Models Andrews, Timothy; Gregory, Jonathan M.; Webb, Mark J. Journal of Climate, Vol. 28, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00545.1	journal	February 2015
Response of a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Sensitivity to the Rate of Increase Stouffer, Ronald J.; Manabe, Syukuro Journal of Climate, Vol. 12, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<2224:ROACOA>2.0.CO;2	journal	August 1999
Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity Knutti, Reto; Rugenstein, Maria A. A.; Hegerl, Gabriele C. Nature Geoscience, Vol. 10, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3017	journal	September 2017
Interhemispheric asymmetry in climate response to a gradual increase of atmospheric CO2 Stouffer, R. J.; Manabe, S.; Bryan, K. Nature, Vol. 342, Issue 6250 https://doi.org/10.1038/342660a0	journal	December 1989
Sensitivity of Historical Climate Simulations to Uncertain Aerosol Forcing Dittus, Andrea J.; Hawkins, Ed; Wilcox, Laura J. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 47, Issue 13 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085806	journal	June 2020
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – technical overview Righi, Mattia; Andela, Bouwe; Eyring, Veronika Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1179-2020	journal	January 2020
Feedbacks, climate sensitivity and the limits of linear models Knutti, Reto; Rugenstein, Maria A. A. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 373, Issue 2054 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0146	journal	November 2015
The Impact of Prescribed Ozone in Climate Projections Run With HadGEM3‐GC3.1 Hardiman, Steven C.; Andrews, Martin B.; Andrews, Timothy Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001714	journal	November 2019
Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0 Winton, M.; Adcroft, A.; Dunne, J. P. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001838	journal	January 2020
What Climate Sensitivity Index Is Most Useful for Projections? Grose, Michael R.; Gregory, Jonathan; Colman, Robert Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 45, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075742	journal	February 2018
The Canadian Earth System Model version 5 (CanESM5.0.3) Swart, Neil C.; Cole, Jason N. S.; Kharin, Viatcheslav V. Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 12, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4823-2019	journal	January 2019
Strong Dependence of Atmospheric Feedbacks on Mixed‐Phase Microphysics and Aerosol‐Cloud Interactions in HadGEM3 Bodas‐Salcedo, A.; Mulcahy, J. P.; Andrews, T. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 11, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001688	journal	June 2019
Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change Winton, Michael; Takahashi, Ken; Held, Isaac M. Journal of Climate, Vol. 23, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3139.1	journal	May 2010
Sensitivity of a global climate model to an increase of CO ₂ concentration in the atmosphere Manabe, Syukuro; Stouffer, Ronald J. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 85, Issue C10 https://doi.org/10.1029/JC085iC10p05529	journal	January 1980
Variation in climate sensitivity and feedback parameters during the historical period: VARIATION IN CLIMATE SENSITIVITY Gregory, J. M.; Andrews, T. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 43, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068406	journal	April 2016
Earth System Model Evaluation Tool (ESMValTool) v2.0 – an extended set of large-scale diagnostics for quasi-operational and comprehensive evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP Eyring, Veronika; Bock, Lisa; Lauer, Axel Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3383-2020	journal	January 2020
The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) Danabasoglu, G.; Lamarque, J. ‐F.; Bacmeister, J. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, Vol. 12, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001916	journal	February 2020
Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity Obtained From Multimillennial Runs of Two GFDL Climate Models Paynter, D.; Frölicher, T. L.; Horowitz, L. W. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027885	journal	February 2018
On the increased climate sensitivity in the EC-Earth model from CMIP5 to CMIP6 Wyser, Klaus; van Noije, Twan; Yang, Shuting Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 13, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3465-2020	journal	January 2020

Cited By (5)

Sea Ice Area climatologies and 21st century change in the CMIP5 and CMIP6 multi-model ensembles Holmes, Caroline NERC EDS UK Polar Data Centre https://doi.org/10.5285/e67242f2-e9aa-4402-85a3-be42d13354af	dataset	January 2022
Future sea level change under CMIP5 and CMIP6 scenarios from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets Payne, Antony J.; Nowicki, Sophie; Abe-Ouchi, Ayako ESS Open Archive https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10505094.1	preprint	December 2020
Will Artificial Intelligence supersede Earth System and Climate Models? Irrgang, Christopher; Boers, Niklas; Sonnewald, Maike arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2101.09126	text	January 2021
Comparing different generations of idealized solar geoengineering simulations in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) Kravitz, Ben; MacMartin, Douglas G.; Visioni, Daniele Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4231-2021	journal	January 2021
Large-scale features of Last Interglacial climate: results from evaluating the <i>lig127k</i> simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6)–Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project (PMIP4) Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.; Brady, Esther C.; Zhao, Anni Climate of the Past, Vol. 17, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-63-2021	journal	January 2021