skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Power Curve Working Group's assessment of wind turbine power performance prediction methods

Journal Article · · Wind Energy Science (Online)
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [1];  [2];  [4];  [5]
  1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
  2. Renewable Energy Systems (United Kingdom)
  3. Univ. of Stuttgart (Germany). Stuttgart Wind Energy, Inst. of Aircraft Design and Manufacture
  4. DNV GL, Portland, OR (United States)
  5. SSE plc, Glasgow, Scotland (United States)

Wind turbine power production deviates from the reference power curve in real-world atmospheric conditions. Correctly predicting turbine power performance requires models to be validated for a wide range of wind turbines using inflow in different locations. The Share-3 exercise is the most recent intelligence-sharing exercise of the Power Curve Working Group, which aims to advance the modeling of turbine performance. The goal of the exercise is to search for modeling methods that reduce error and uncertainty in power prediction when wind shear and turbulence digress from design conditions. Herein, we analyze data from 55 wind turbine power performance tests from nine contributing organizations with statistical tests to quantify the skills of the prediction-correction methods. We assess the accuracy and precision of four proposed trial methods against the baseline method, which uses the conventional definition of a power curve with wind speed and air density at hub height. The trial methods reduce power-production prediction errors compared to the baseline method at high wind speeds, which contribute heavily to power production; however, the trial methods fail to significantly reduce prediction uncertainty in most meteorological conditions. For the meteorological conditions when a wind turbine produces less than the power its reference power curve suggests, using power deviation matrices leads to more accurate power prediction. We also determine that for more than half of the submissions, the data set has a large influence on the effectiveness of a trial method. Overall, this work affirms the value of data-sharing efforts in advancing power curve modeling and establishes the groundwork for future collaborations.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Wind and Water Technologies Office (EE-4W)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
OSTI ID:
1600901
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5000-76102
Journal Information:
Wind Energy Science (Online), Vol. 5, Issue 1; ISSN 2366-7451
Publisher:
European Wind Energy Association - CopernicusCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

References (28)

Wind turbine power curves incorporating turbulence intensity: Wind turbine power curves incorporating turbulence intensity journal November 2012
Comparative analysis of binning and Gaussian Process based blade pitch angle curve of a wind turbine for the purpose of condition monitoring journal October 2018
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python journal February 2020
Power curve measurement with a nacelle mounted lidar: Power curve measurement with a nacelle lidar journal June 2013
Nacelle power curve measurement with spinner anemometer and uncertainty evaluation journal January 2017
Influence of atmospheric stability on wind turbine loads: Atmospheric stability and loads journal July 2012
Atmospheric stability affects wind turbine power collection journal January 2012
Using machine learning to predict wind turbine power output journal April 2013
Robust Tests for the Equality of Variances journal June 1974
Time Adaptive Conditional Kernel Density Estimation for Wind Power Forecasting journal October 2012
Comparative analysis of binning and support vector regression for wind turbine rotor speed based power curve use in condition monitoring conference September 2018
Performance Test of a 3MW Wind Turbine – Effects of Shear and Turbulence journal January 2015
Influence of Atmospheric Stability on Wind Turbine Power Performance Curves journal February 2006
On “Field Significance” and the False Discovery Rate journal September 2006
Monotone Piecewise Cubic Interpolation journal April 1980
The importance of atmospheric turbulence and stability in machine-learning models of wind farm power production journal September 2019
The Impact of Levene’s Test of Equality of Variances on Statistical Theory and Practice journal August 2009
A kernel plus method for quantifying wind turbine performance upgrades: Kernel plus method journal April 2014
Modeling wind-turbine power curve: A data partitioning and mining approach journal March 2017
Incorporating air density into a Gaussian process wind turbine power curve model for improving fitting accuracy journal October 2018
Using Conditional Kernel Density Estimation for Wind Power Density Forecasting journal March 2012
Power Curve Estimation With Multivariate Environmental Factors for Inland and Offshore Wind Farms journal January 2015
Influence of turbulence intensity on wind turbine power curves journal October 2017
Comparison of different measurement methods for a nacelle-based lidar power curve journal June 2018
A Critical Review on Wind Turbine Power Curve Modelling Techniques and Their Applications in Wind Based Energy Systems journal January 2016
Wind turbine power curve modelling using artificial neural network journal April 2016
Power Performance Measurements of the NREL CART-2 Wind Turbine Using a Nacelle-Based Lidar Scanner journal October 2014
Wind power curve modeling in complex terrain using statistical models journal January 2015