skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Regional techno-economic and life-cycle analysis of the pyrolysis-bioenergy-biochar platform for carbon-negative energy

Journal Article · · Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.2043· OSTI ID:1575869
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [4];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States). Computational Engineering Div.
  2. Indiana Univ. Purdue Univ. Indianapolis, IN (United States). School of Public and Environmental Affairs
  3. Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA (United States). Dept. of Agronomy
  4. Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA (United States). Bioeconomy Inst. and Dept. of Mechanical Engineering

This study investigates the sensitivity of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the minimum fuel selling price for a 2000 metric ton day–1 integrated pyrolysis–bioenergy–biochar platform with respect to the biorefinery location and biomass types. The regional techno–economic and life–cycle analysis is evaluated in three US counties using representative crops: rice in Glenn County (California), corn in Hamilton County (Iowa), and peanuts in Jackson County (Florida). We evaluate the biochar selling price considering crop yield increases of 0.6%, 2.9%, and 10% after biochar application over 20 years in Glenn County, Hamilton County, and Jackson County, respectively. The biochar prices are calculated under low and high commodity prices to determine upper and lower bounds. Jackson County has the most economically beneficial scenario with an average minimum fuel selling price (MFSP) of 1.55 gal–1 of biofuel produced whereas Hamilton County has the highest average MFSP of 3.82 gal–1. The life–cycle analysis shows that woody biomass has a strong potential to produce carbon–negative energy compared to grass and straw. As a result, of the 304 cases scenarios considered for this platform, 64% could produce biofuel with negative GHG emissions, which would meet the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) target for cellulosic biofuels.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344; AC52‐07NA27344; LLNL‐JRNL‐771037
OSTI ID:
1575869
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1564420
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-771037; 962497
Journal Information:
Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, Vol. 13, Issue 6; ISSN 1932-104X
Publisher:
WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 13 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (27)

Techno-economic analysis of biomass fast pyrolysis to transportation fuels journal November 2010
Process Design and Economics for the Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Hydrocarbon Fuels: Fast Pyrolysis and Hydrotreating Bio-oil Pathway report November 2013
Characterization of bio-oil recovered as stage fractions with unique chemical and physical properties journal January 2012
Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physicochemical properties of biochar obtained from the fast pyrolysis of pitch pine (Pinus rigida) journal August 2012
Life cycle inventory development for corn and stover production systems under different allocation methods journal November 2013
Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use journal December 2012
Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review journal May 2006
The impacts of biomass properties on pyrolysis yields, economic and environmental performance of the pyrolysis-bioenergy-biochar platform to carbon negative energy journal October 2017
Life cycle assessment journal July 2004
Life cycle analysis of fuel production from fast pyrolysis of biomass journal April 2013
Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems: Estimating the Energetic, Economic, and Climate Change Potential journal January 2010
Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration journal November 2015
The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration journal October 2011
The Charcoal Vision: A Win–Win–Win Scenario for Simultaneously Producing Bioenergy, Permanently Sequestering Carbon, while Improving Soil and Water Quality journal January 2008
Producing energy while sequestering carbon? The relationship between biochar and agricultural productivity journal April 2014
Use of inverse modelling and Bayesian optimization for investigating the effect of biochar on soil hydrological properties journal September 2018
Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review journal March 2006
Techno-economic and uncertainty analysis of in situ and ex situ fast pyrolysis for biofuel production journal November 2015
Techno-Economic Analysis of the Stabilization of Bio-Oil Fractions for Insertion into Petroleum Refineries journal December 2016
Dynamic Molecular Structure of Plant Biomass-Derived Black Carbon (Biochar) journal February 2010
Impact of six lignocellulosic biochars on C and N dynamics of two contrasting soils journal January 2017
The Charcoal Vision: A Win–Win–Win Scenario for Simultaneously Producing Bioenergy, Permanently Sequestering Carbon, while Improving Soil and Water Quality journal January 2008
Overview of Applications of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil journal March 2004
Regional differences in the economic feasibility of advanced biorefineries: Fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing journal June 2013
Estimating profitability of two biochar production scenarios: slow pyrolysis vs fast pyrolysis journal December 2010
Life cycle assessment journal November 1997
Life Cycle Assessment text January 2020