skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Galaxies in X-ray selected clusters and groups in Dark Energy Survey data – II. Hierarchical Bayesian modelling of the red-sequence galaxy luminosity function

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [3];  [3];  [3];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [6];  [7];  [8];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12];  [13];  [14];  [15] more »;  [16];  [17];  [3];  [8];  [18];  [19];  [20];  [21];  [22];  [23];  [1];  [24];  [25];  [1];  [4];  [26];  [27];  [28];  [29];  [29];  [30];  [31];  [26];  [1];  [5];  [32];  [1];  [29];  [33];  [29];  [2];  [4];  [27];  [26];  [1];  [34];  [35];  [36];  [37];  [1];  [38];  [1];  [26];  [31];  [17];  [39];  [27];  [40];  [26];  [41];  [42];  [6];  [42];  [43];  [1];  [44];  [45];  [46];  [6];  [22] « less
  1. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, PO Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
  2. Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Pevensey Building, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK
  4. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, PO Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
  5. Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Scheinerstr 1, D-81679 Munich, Germany, Excellence Cluster Universe, Boltzmannstr 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  6. Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  7. Taejon Christian International School, Yuseong, Daejeon 34035, South Korea
  8. Institute of Cosmology & Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3FX, UK
  9. Jodrell Bank Center for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  10. Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, IC2, Liverpool Science Park, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK
  11. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
  12. Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, University of KwaZuluNatal, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, South Africa
  13. Fakultät für Physik, Universitäts-Sternwarte, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheinerstr 1, D-81679 München, Germany
  14. Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  15. Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  16. Institute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK
  17. George P. and Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
  18. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Box 516, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden
  19. Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YB, UK
  20. Instituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Universidade do Porto, CAUP, Rua das Estrelas, P-4150-762 Porto, Portugal, Departamento de Física e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, P-4169-007 Porto, Portugal
  21. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, PO Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA, Department of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  22. Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile
  23. Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK, Department of Physics and Electronics, Rhodes University, PO Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa
  24. Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK, CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, F-75014 Paris, France, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7095, F-75014 Paris, France
  25. Department of Physics & Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
  26. Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921-400, Brazil, Observatório Nacional, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921-400, Brazil
  27. Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois, 1002 W. Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA, National Center for Supercomputing Applications, 1205 West Clark St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA
  28. Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
  29. Institute of Space Sciences, IEEC-CSIC, Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/n, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
  30. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, PO Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  31. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
  32. Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
  33. Instituto de Fisica Teorica UAM/CSIC, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
  34. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
  35. Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
  36. Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
  37. Australian Astronomical Observatory, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia
  38. Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921-400, Brazil, Departamento de Física Matemática, Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 66318, São Paulo, SP 05314-970, Brazil
  39. Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
  40. Institut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, E-08010 Barcelona, Spain
  41. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Dr., Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
  42. Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), E-28040 Madrid, Spain
  43. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
  44. Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LIneA, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921-400, Brazil, Instituto de Física Gleb Wataghin, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-859 Campinas, SP, Brazil
  45. Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA
  46. National Center for Supercomputing Applications, 1205 West Clark St., Urbana, IL 61801, USA

Using ~100 X-ray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data, in this work we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red-sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous optical/X-ray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the LF simultaneously in redshift (0.1 < z < 1.05) and cluster mass ($$13.5 \le \rm {log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim \lt 15.0$$). We pay particular attention to completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schechter function, including its characteristic break (m*) to a faint end power-law slope (α). Our approach allows us to avoid known issues in similar analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and statistically insignificant (~1.9σ) evolution in the faint end slope α versus redshift. We also find no dependence in α or m* with the X-ray inferred cluster masses. Yet, the amplitude of the LF as a function of cluster mass is constrained to $${\sim } 20{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$$ precision. As a by-product of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses as well as the scatter in true mass given the X-ray inferred masses. This technique can be applied to a larger sample of X-ray or optically selected clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, greatly improving the sensitivity of the analysis.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States); Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP); USDOE Office of Science (SC), Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR); National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contributing Organization:
DES Collaboration
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0013520; AC02-07CH11359; AC05-00OR22725; AST-1138766; AST-1536171; SC0019193
OSTI ID:
1532562
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1469011; OSTI ID: 1560425; OSTI ID: 1700650
Report Number(s):
arXiv:1710.05908; FERMILAB-PUB-17-433-E; DES-2015-0144
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 488 Journal Issue: 1; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical SocietyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 7 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (97)

An optically-selected cluster catalog at redshift 0.1 < z < 1.1 from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program S16A data journal June 2017
Evolution of the cluster optical galaxy luminosity function in the CFHTLS: breaking the degeneracy between mass and redshift journal May 2018
The Galaxy Content of sdss Clusters and Groups journal June 2009
Analytic model for galaxy and dark matter clustering journal October 2000
Crowded Field Galaxy Photometry: Precision Colors in the CLASH Clusters journal October 2017
Halo model at its best: constraints on conditional luminosity functions from measured galaxy statistics journal January 2006
GALAXIES IN X-RAY SELECTED CLUSTERS AND GROUPS IN DARK ENERGY SURVEY DATA. I. STELLAR MASS GROWTH OF BRIGHT CENTRAL GALAXIES SINCE z ∼ 1.2 journal January 2016
Towards a concordant model of halo occupation statistics journal April 2007
Deep luminosity functions and colour–magnitude relations for cluster galaxies at 0.2 < z < 0.6 journal August 2013
Galaxy Groups in the SDSS DR4. II. Halo Occupation Statistics journal March 2008
Galaxy Evolution from Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of DEEP2 and SDSS Galaxy Clustering journal October 2007
GMASS ultradeep spectroscopy of galaxies at z ~ 2 : V. Witnessing the assembly at journal July 2009
HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere journal April 2005
The evolution of disk galaxies and the origin of S0 galaxies journal April 1980
Gone with the Wind: The Origin of S0 Galaxies in Clusters journal June 2000
The XMM Cluster Survey: Present status and latest results: The XMM Cluster Survey: Present status and latest results journal May 2013
Weighing the Giants – II. Improved calibration of photometry from stellar colours and accurate photometric redshifts journal February 2014
THE REST-FRAME OPTICAL LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF CLUSTER GALAXIES AT z < 0.8 AND THE ASSEMBLY OF THE CLUSTER RED SEQUENCE journal July 2009
The DES Science Verification weak lensing shear catalogues journal May 2016
CONSTRAINING THE SCATTER IN THE MASS-RICHNESS RELATION OF maxBCG CLUSTERS WITH WEAK LENSING AND X-RAY DATA journal June 2009
The Connection Between Galaxies and dark Matter Structures in the Local Universe journal June 2013
RASS-SDSS galaxy cluster survey: II. A unified picture of the cluster luminosity function journal March 2005
The XMM Cluster Survey: optical analysis methodology and the first data release: The XMM Cluster Survey first data release journal April 2012
An Ultra Fast Image Generator (UFig) for wide-field astronomy journal February 2013
Dependence of the bright end of composite galaxy luminosity functions on cluster dynamical states journal January 2015
MaxBCG: A Red‐Sequence Galaxy Cluster Finder journal May 2007
Evolution of the Color‐Magnitude Relation in High‐Redshift Clusters: Early‐Type Galaxies in the Lynx Supercluster at z ∼ 1.26 journal June 2006
The evolution of the cluster optical galaxy luminosity function between z = 0.4 and 0.9 in the DAFT/FADA survey journal March 2015
The accelerated build-up of the red sequence in high-redshift galaxy clusters journal February 2016
Galaxy Populations in Massive Galaxy Clusters to $z$ = 1.1: Color Distribution, Concentration, Halo Occupation Number and Red Sequence Fraction journal January 2017
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8 journal May 2013
Galaxy halo masses and satellite fractions from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: stellar mass, luminosity, morphology and environment dependencies journal May 2006
An IR-selected Galaxy Cluster at z = 1.41 journal November 2005
Modeling the Transfer Function for the dark Energy Survey journal March 2015
WEAK LENSING CALIBRATED M - T SCALING RELATION OF GALAXY GROUPS IN THE COSMOS FIELD journal November 2013
K -Corrections and Filter Transformations in the Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-Infrared journal January 2007
An Increase in the Faint Red Galaxy Population in Massive Clusters since z ∼ 0.5 journal May 2007
An analytic expression for the luminosity function for galaxies. journal January 1976
Galaxy Luminosity Functions to z ∼1 from DEEP2 and COMBO‐17: Implications for Red Galaxy Formation journal August 2007
Galaxy Groups in the sdss dr4. iii. the Luminosity and Stellar mass Functions journal April 2009
The Red-Sequence Luminosity Function in Massive Intermediate-Redshift Galaxy Clusters journal December 2008
NEW CONSTRAINTS ON THE EVOLUTION OF THE STELLAR-TO-DARK MATTER CONNECTION: A COMBINED ANALYSIS OF GALAXY-GALAXY LENSING, CLUSTERING, AND STELLAR MASS FUNCTIONS FROM z = 0.2 to z = 1 journal December 2011
Fossil group origins: V. The dependence of the luminosity function on the magnitude gap journal August 2015
A SPITZER -SELECTED GALAXY CLUSTER AT z = 1.62 journal June 2010
Precision photometry of early-type galaxies in the Coma and Virgo clusters: a test of the universality of the colour-magnitude relation - I. The data journal February 1992
Spatial Correlation Function and Pairwise Velocity Dispersion of Galaxies: Cold Dark Matter Models versus the Las Campanas Survey journal February 1998
The galaxy luminosity function in groups and clusters: the faint-end upturn and the connection to the field luminosity function journal April 2016
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
First Results on the Cluster Galaxy Population from the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey. III. Brightest Cluster Galaxies, Stellar Mass Distribution, and Active Galaxies journal December 2017
The history of mass assembly of faint red galaxies in 28 galaxy clusters since z =  1.3 journal May 2008
The XMM Cluster Survey: X-ray analysis methodology: XCS: x-ray analysis methodology journal October 2011
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 journal October 2003
The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass journal August 2002
EzGal: A Flexible Interface for Stellar Population Synthesis Models journal June 2012
DES13S2cmm: the first superluminous supernova from the Dark Energy Survey journal March 2015
The C4 Clustering Algorithm: Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal September 2005
Suppression of star formation in the central 200 kpc of a z= 1.4 galaxy cluster: Star formation in XMMU J2235.3−2557 at z=1.4 journal June 2012
SExtractor: Software for source extraction journal June 1996
No galaxy left behind: accurate measurements with the faintest objects in the Dark Energy Survey journal January 2016
Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies journal June 1980
The luminosity function of the NoSOCS galaxy cluster sample: The LF of the NoSOCS cluster sample journal April 2011
The Red‐Sequence Luminosity Function in Galaxy Clusters since z ∼ 1 journal February 2008
Constraining galaxy formation and cosmology with the conditional luminosity function of galaxies journal March 2003
The build-up of the colour-magnitude relation in galaxy clusters since z  0.8 journal January 2007
The dark Energy Camera journal October 2015
A Multiband Study of the Galaxy Populations of the First four Sunyaev-Zel'Dovich Effect Selected Galaxy Clusters journal May 2011
Clusters of Galaxies in the First Half of the Universe from the IRAC Shallow Survey journal September 2008
emcee : The MCMC Hammer
  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925 https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
journal March 2013
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Photometric Data Set for Cosmology journal April 2018
On the origin of the faint-end of the red sequence in high-density environments journal October 2014
Photometric redshift analysis in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal October 2014
On the Infall of Matter Into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution journal August 1972
H α photometry of Abell 2390 journal November 2000
THE XMM CLUSTER SURVEY: GALAXY MORPHOLOGIES AND THE COLOR-MAGNITUDE RELATION IN XMMXCS J2215.9 – 1738 AT z = 1.46 journal May 2009
A New Method For Galaxy Cluster Detection. I. The Algorithm journal October 2000
A mature cluster with X-ray emission at z = 2.07 journal January 2011
An X-Ray Detected Group of Quiescent Early-Type Galaxies at z = 1.6 in the Chandra Deep Field South journal February 2013
Galaxy halo occupation at high redshift journal January 2002
Strangulation as the primary mechanism for shutting down star formation in galaxies journal May 2015
Weak-lensing mass calibration of redMaPPer galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data journal May 2017
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) journal February 2006
The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data journal May 2016
RASS-SDSS galaxy cluster survey: VII. On the cluster mass-to-light ratio and the halo occupation distribution journal September 2006
The colour-magnitude relation of elliptical and lenticular galaxies in the ESO Distant Cluster Survey: The CMR of E/S0 galaxies journal October 2010
Galaxy Clusters Discovered via the Sunyaev-Zel'Dovich Effect in the 2500-Square-Degree Spt-Sz Survey journal January 2015
Halo occupation numbers and galaxy bias journal November 2000
Galaxy Clustering in the Completed sdss Redshift Survey: the Dependence on Color and Luminosity journal July 2011
The accretion of galaxies into groups and clusters journal December 2009
The K -band luminosity functions of cluster galaxies journal November 2016
Robust Optical Richness Estimation with Reduced Scatter journal February 2012
Mapping and Simulating Systematics due to Spatially Varying Observing Conditions in des Science Verification data journal October 2016
Constraints on the richness–mass relation and the optical-SZE positional offset distribution for SZE-selected clusters journal October 2015
Morphological evolution in situ: disc-dominated cluster red sequences at z ∼ 1.25 journal April 2015
The Origin of Star Formation Gradients in Rich Galaxy Clusters journal September 2000
Morphological evolution of cluster red sequence galaxies in the past 9 Gyr journal June 2016
Discovery of an X-Ray-luminous Galaxy Cluster at z  = 1.4 journal March 2005
The ratio of luminous to faint red-sequence galaxies in X-ray and optically selected low-redshift clusters journal April 2010

Similar Records

Are ultra-faint galaxies at z = 6–8 responsible for cosmic reionization? Combined constraints from the Hubble Frontier Fields clusters and parallels
Journal Article · Fri Nov 20 00:00:00 EST 2015 · Astrophysical Journal · OSTI ID:1532562

A joint SZ–X-ray–optical analysis of the dynamical state of 288 massive galaxy clusters
Journal Article · Mon May 04 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1532562

On the Cosmological Evolution of the Luminosity Function and the Accretion Rate of Quasars
Journal Article · Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2000 · Astrophysical Journal · OSTI ID:1532562