H+1 Jet Production Revisited
Abstract
We revisit the nexttonexttoleading order (NNLO) calculation of the Higgs boson+1~jet production process, calculated in the $$m_t \to \infty$$ effective field theory. We perform a detailed comparison of the result calculated using the jettiness slicing method, with published results obtained using subtraction methods. The results of the jettiness calculation agree with the two previous subtraction calculations at benchmark points. The performance of the jettiness slicing approach is greatly improved by adopting a definition of 1jettiness that accounts for the boost of the Born system. Nevertheless, the results demonstrate that power corrections in the jettiness slicing method remain significant. At large transverse momentum the effect of power corrections is much reduced, as expected.
 Authors:

 Fermilab
 Durham U.
 Publication Date:
 Research Org.:
 Fermi National Accelerator Lab. (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
 Sponsoring Org.:
 USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP) (SC25)
 OSTI Identifier:
 1545080
 Report Number(s):
 arXiv:1906.01020; FERMILABPUB19189T; IPPP/19/33
1738316
 DOE Contract Number:
 AC0207CH11359
 Resource Type:
 Journal Article
 Journal Name:
 TBD
 Additional Journal Information:
 Journal Name: TBD
 Country of Publication:
 United States
 Language:
 English
 Subject:
 72 PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS
Citation Formats
Campbell, John M., Ellis, R. Keith, and Seth, Satyajit. H+1 Jet Production Revisited. United States: N. p., 2019.
Web.
Campbell, John M., Ellis, R. Keith, & Seth, Satyajit. H+1 Jet Production Revisited. United States.
Campbell, John M., Ellis, R. Keith, and Seth, Satyajit. Mon .
"H+1 Jet Production Revisited". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1545080.
@article{osti_1545080,
title = {H+1 Jet Production Revisited},
author = {Campbell, John M. and Ellis, R. Keith and Seth, Satyajit},
abstractNote = {We revisit the nexttonexttoleading order (NNLO) calculation of the Higgs boson+1~jet production process, calculated in the $m_t \to \infty$ effective field theory. We perform a detailed comparison of the result calculated using the jettiness slicing method, with published results obtained using subtraction methods. The results of the jettiness calculation agree with the two previous subtraction calculations at benchmark points. The performance of the jettiness slicing approach is greatly improved by adopting a definition of 1jettiness that accounts for the boost of the Born system. Nevertheless, the results demonstrate that power corrections in the jettiness slicing method remain significant. At large transverse momentum the effect of power corrections is much reduced, as expected.},
doi = {},
journal = {TBD},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {2019},
month = {6}
}