skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( d , p ) reactions

Abstract

Recent work has studied the uncertainty in predictions for $A(d,p)B$ reactions using the distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA), coming from the parametrization of the effective $dA$ interactions [Lovell et al. Phys. Rev. C 95, 024611 (2017)]. There are different levels of sophistication in reaction theories for one-nucleon transfer reactions, including the adiabatic wave approximation (ADWA) which takes deuteron breakup into account to all orders. In this paper, we quantify the uncertainties associated with the ADWA method that come from the parametrization of the NA interactions and compare ADWA with DWBA. Similar to Lovell et al., we use nucleon elastic-scattering data on a wide variety of targets at the appropriate incoming and outgoing energies to constrain the optical potential input to the ADWA theory. Pulling from the χ 2 distribution, we obtain 95% confidence bands for the elastic distributions. From the resulting parameters, we predict 95% confidence bands for the ( d , p ) transfer cross sections. Results obtained with the standard uncorrelated χ 2 are compared to those using the correlated χ 2 of Lovell et al. We also repeat the DWBA calculations for the exact same reactions for comparison purposes. We find that NA elastic-scattering data provide a significant constraint to the interactions, and, when the uncertainties are propagated to the transfer reactions using ADWA, predictions are consistent with the transfer data. The angular distributions for ADWA differ from those predicted by DWBA, particularly at small angles. As in Lovell et al., confidence bands obtained using the uncorrelated χ 2 function are unrealistically narrow and become much wider when the correlated χ 2 function is considered. For most cases, the uncertainty bands obtained in ADWA are narrower than DWBA when using elastic data of similar quality and range. However, given the large uncertainties predicted from the correlated χ 2 function, at this point, the transfer data cannot discriminate between these two methods.

Authors:
 [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States). National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab. Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
  2. Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States). National Superconducting Cyclotron Lab. Dept. of Physics and Astronomy; Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States); Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); National Science Foundation (NSF)
OSTI Identifier:
1525887
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1479168
Grant/Contract Number:  
FG52-08NA28552; NA0002135; PHY-1403906; FG52- 08NA28552
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Physical Review C
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 98; Journal Issue: 4; Journal ID: ISSN 2469-9985
Publisher:
American Physical Society (APS)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS

Citation Formats

King, G. B., Lovell, A. E., and Nunes, F. M. Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( d,p ) reactions. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044623.
King, G. B., Lovell, A. E., & Nunes, F. M. Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( d,p ) reactions. United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044623
King, G. B., Lovell, A. E., and Nunes, F. M. Fri . "Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( d,p ) reactions". United States. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044623. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1525887.
@article{osti_1525887,
title = {Uncertainty quantification due to optical potentials in models for ( d,p ) reactions},
author = {King, G. B. and Lovell, A. E. and Nunes, F. M.},
abstractNote = {Recent work has studied the uncertainty in predictions for $A(d,p)B$ reactions using the distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA), coming from the parametrization of the effective $dA$ interactions [Lovell et al. Phys. Rev. C 95, 024611 (2017)]. There are different levels of sophistication in reaction theories for one-nucleon transfer reactions, including the adiabatic wave approximation (ADWA) which takes deuteron breakup into account to all orders. In this paper, we quantify the uncertainties associated with the ADWA method that come from the parametrization of the NA interactions and compare ADWA with DWBA. Similar to Lovell et al., we use nucleon elastic-scattering data on a wide variety of targets at the appropriate incoming and outgoing energies to constrain the optical potential input to the ADWA theory. Pulling from the χ2 distribution, we obtain 95% confidence bands for the elastic distributions. From the resulting parameters, we predict 95% confidence bands for the (d,p) transfer cross sections. Results obtained with the standard uncorrelated χ2 are compared to those using the correlated χ2 of Lovell et al. We also repeat the DWBA calculations for the exact same reactions for comparison purposes. We find that NA elastic-scattering data provide a significant constraint to the interactions, and, when the uncertainties are propagated to the transfer reactions using ADWA, predictions are consistent with the transfer data. The angular distributions for ADWA differ from those predicted by DWBA, particularly at small angles. As in Lovell et al., confidence bands obtained using the uncorrelated χ2 function are unrealistically narrow and become much wider when the correlated χ2 function is considered. For most cases, the uncertainty bands obtained in ADWA are narrower than DWBA when using elastic data of similar quality and range. However, given the large uncertainties predicted from the correlated χ2 function, at this point, the transfer data cannot discriminate between these two methods.},
doi = {10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044623},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1525887}, journal = {Physical Review C},
issn = {2469-9985},
number = 4,
volume = 98,
place = {United States},
year = {2018},
month = {10}
}

Journal Article:

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Microscopic calculations based on chiral two- and three-nucleon forces for proton- and He 4 -nucleus scattering
journal, August 2015


Finite-range effects in ( d , p ) reactions
journal, July 2010


Proton Elastic Scattering Measurements at 16 MeV with Optical-Model Analysis
journal, March 1972


Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics
journal, April 1988


Nonlocality in Deuteron Stripping Reactions
journal, March 2013


Global deuteron optical model potential for the energy range up to 183 MeV
journal, May 2006


Forbidden transitions in the Ca 48 ( d ,   p ) Ca 49 reaction
journal, September 1975


Nucleon-Nucleus Optical-Model Parameters, A > 40 , E < 50 MeV
journal, June 1969


Local phenomenological nucleon-nucleon potentials
journal, December 1968


Adiabatic approximation versus exact Faddeev method for ( d , p ) and ( p , d ) reactions
journal, September 2011


Local and global nucleon optical models from 1 keV to 200 MeV
journal, January 2003


Optical potential from first principles
journal, February 2017


Nuclear Force Imprints Revealed on the Elastic Scattering of Protons with C 10
journal, June 2017


Scattering of 22.5-MeV Protons from Zirconium and the Symmetry Term in the Nuclear Optical Potential
journal, August 1964


Uncertainty quantification for optical model parameters
journal, February 2017


The deuteron optical potential at low energies
journal, October 1991


An approximate three-body theory of deuteron stripping
journal, December 1974


High-resolution study of Pb 208 with 35-MeV protons
journal, September 1975


Evidence for the deuteron-nucleus tensor interaction
journal, February 1974


Continuum-discretized coupled-channels calculations for three-body models of deuteron-nucleus reactions
journal, October 1987


Comparing nonperturbative models of the breakup of neutron-halo nuclei
journal, April 2012


Transfer reaction code with nonlocal interactions
journal, October 2016


Examination of the adiabatic approximation for ( d , p ) reactions
journal, June 2017


Mechanism of (d, α) reaction: using vector- and tensor-polarized deuterons
journal, September 1987


Explicit inclusion of nonlocality in ( d , p ) transfer reactions
journal, January 2016


Benchmarking theoretical formalisms for ( p , p n ) reactions: The C 15 ( p , p n ) C 14 case
journal, February 2018


Study of excited states of 40Ca and 48Ca by the (p, p'γ) reaction at Ep = 12 MeV
journal, April 1969


Elastic scattering of protons from 40 , 42 , 44 , 48 Ca from 20 to 50 MeV and nuclear matter radii
journal, May 1986


Zr 9 0 , 9 2 , 9 4 ( p ,   p ) Reactions at 12.7 MeV
journal, April 1968


Ab initio translationally invariant nonlocal one-body densities from no-core shell-model theory
journal, February 2018


Neutron scattering from 90,91,92,94Zr
journal, October 1990


Microscopic optical potentials derived from ab initio translationally invariant nonlocal one-body densities
journal, March 2018


A global nucleon optical model potential
journal, March 1991


    Works referencing / citing this record:

    Exploring experimental conditions to reduce uncertainties in the optical potential
    journal, December 2019