What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Title: What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Full Record
Other Related Research

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:: Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; Young, Kevin; Sarovar, Mohan; Blume-Kohout, Robin J

Publication Date:: 2018-01-01

Research Org.:: Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: IARPA

OSTI Identifier:: 1512065

Report Number(s):: SAND2018-0028C
Journal ID: ISSN 0031--9007; 659723

DOE Contract Number:: AC04-94AL85000

Resource Type:: Conference

Resource Relation:: Journal Volume: 119; Journal Issue: 13; Conference: Proposed for presentation at the QIP held January 15-19, 2018 in Delft, Netherlands.

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Formats


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, and Blume-Kohout, Robin J. What randomized benchmarking actually measures..  United States: N. p., 2018. 
        Web.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.

Copy to clipboard


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, & Blume-Kohout, Robin J. What randomized benchmarking actually measures..  United States.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.

Copy to clipboard


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, and Blume-Kohout, Robin J. Mon .  
        "What randomized benchmarking actually measures.".  United States.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1512065.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1512065,

  title        = {What randomized benchmarking actually measures.},

  author       = {Proctor, Timothy James and Rudinger, Kenneth Michael and Young, Kevin and Sarovar, Mohan and Blume-Kohout, Robin J},

  abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502},

  journal      = {},

  issn         = {0031--9007},

  number       = 13,

  volume       = 119,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {2018},

  month        = {1}

}

Copy to clipboard

Conference:

View Conference (2.04 MB)

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Other availability

Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices

Journal Article Proctor, Timothy J. ; Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud ; Rudinger, Kenneth ; ... - Physical Review Letters

Benchmarking methods that can be adapted to multiqubit systems are essential for assessing the overall or “holistic” performance of nascent quantum processors. The current industry standard is Clifford randomized benchmarking (RB), which measures a single error rate that quantifies overall performance. But, scaling Clifford RB to many qubits is surprisingly hard. It has only been performed on one, two, and three qubits as of this writing. This reflects a fundamental inefficiency in Clifford RB: the n-qubit Clifford gates at its core have to be compiled into large circuits over the one- and two-qubit gates native to a device. As nmore »« less
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.030503
What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures

Journal Article Proctor, Timothy ; Rudinger, Kenneth ; Young, Kevin ; ... - Physical Review Letters

Randomized benchmarking (RB) is widely used to measure an error rate of a set of quantum gates, by performing random circuits that would do nothing if the gates were perfect. In the limit of no finite-sampling error, the exponential decay rate of the observable survival probabilities, versus circuit length, yields a single error metric r. For Clifford gates with arbitrary small errors described by process matrices, r was believed to reliably correspond to the mean, over all Clifford gates, of the average gate infidelity between the imperfect gates and their ideal counterparts. We show that this quantity is not amore »« less
Cited by 17
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.130502

Full Text Available
Entity Resolution at Large Scale: Benchmarking and Algorithmics.

Technical Report Berry, Jonathan W. ; Kincher-Winoto, Kina ; Phillips, Cynthia A. ; ...

We seek scalable benchmarks for entity resolution problems. Solutions to these problems range from trivial approaches such as string sorting to sophisticated methods such as statis- tical relational learning. The theoretical and practical complexity of these approaches varies widely, so one of the primary purposes of a benchmark will be to quantify the trade-off between solution quality and runtime. We are motivated by the ubiquitous nature of entity resolution as a fundamental problem faced by any organization that ingests large amounts of noisy text data. A benchmark is typically a rigid specification that provides an objective measure usable for rankingmore »« less
DOI: 10.2172/1493841

Full Text Available
Optimization of a solid-state electron spin qubit using Gate Set Tomography

Journal Article Dehollain, Juan P. ; Muhonen, Juha T. ; Blume-Kohout, Robin J. ; ... - New Journal of Physics

Here, state of the art qubit systems are reaching the gate fidelities required for scalable quantum computation architectures. Further improvements in the fidelity of quantum gates demands characterization and benchmarking protocols that are efficient, reliable and extremely accurate. Ideally, a benchmarking protocol should also provide information on how to rectify residual errors. Gate Set Tomography (GST) is one such protocol designed to give detailed characterization of as-built qubits. We implemented GST on a high-fidelity electron-spin qubit confined by a single ³¹P atom in ²⁸Si. The results reveal systematic errors that a randomized benchmarking analysis could measure but not identify, whereasmore »« less
Cited by 3
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/10/103018

Full Text Available
Optimization of a solid-state electron spin qubit using Gate Set Tomography

Journal Article Dehollain, Juan P. ; Muhonen, Juha T. ; Blume-Kohout, Robin J. ; ... - New Journal of Physics

Here, state of the art qubit systems are reaching the gate fidelities required for scalable quantum computation architectures. Further improvements in the fidelity of quantum gates demands characterization and benchmarking protocols that are efficient, reliable and extremely accurate. Ideally, a benchmarking protocol should also provide information on how to rectify residual errors. Gate Set Tomography (GST) is one such protocol designed to give detailed characterization of as-built qubits. We implemented GST on a high-fidelity electron-spin qubit confined by a single ³¹P atom in ²⁸Si. The results reveal systematic errors that a randomized benchmarking analysis could measure but not identify, whereasmore »« less
Cited by 3
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/18/10/103018

Similar Records