What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; Young, Kevin; Sarovar, Mohan; Blume-Kohout, Robin J

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Conference · 01 January 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502· OSTI ID:1512065

Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; Young, Kevin; Sarovar, Mohan; Blume-Kohout, Robin J

Abstract not provided.

View Conference

Research Organization:: Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: IARPA

DOE Contract Number:: AC04-94AL85000

OSTI ID:: 1512065

Report Number(s):: SAND2018-0028C; 659723

Resource Relation:: Journal Volume: 119; Journal Issue: 13; Conference: Proposed for presentation at the QIP held January 15-19, 2018 in Delft, Netherlands.

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (62)

An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity Veldhorst, M.; Hwang, J. C. C.; Yang, C. H. Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 9, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.216	journal	October 2014
Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric Chow, Jerry M.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Magesan, Easwar arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1311.6330	text	January 2013
Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates Knill, E.; Leibfried, D.; Reichle, R. Physical Review A, Vol. 77, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012307	journal	January 2008
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667	book	January 2011
Optimal quantum control using randomized benchmarking Kelly, J.; Barends, R.; Campbell, B. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1403.0035	text	January 2014
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Megrant, A. Nature, Vol. 508, Issue 7497 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13171	journal	April 2014
Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric Chow, Jerry M.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Magesan, Easwar Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5015	journal	June 2014
Single ion qubit with estimated coherence time exceeding one hour Wang, Pengfei; Luan, Chun-Yang; Qiao, Mu Nature Communications, Vol. 12, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20330-w	journal	January 2021
Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols Epstein, Jeffrey M.; Cross, Andrew W.; Magesan, Easwar Physical Review A, Vol. 89, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.062321	journal	June 2014
Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors Chasseur, T.; Wilhelm, F. K. Physical Review A, Vol. 92, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.042333	journal	October 2015
Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography Blume-Kohout, Robin; Gamble, John King; Nielsen, Erik Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14485	journal	February 2017
Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography Blume-Kohout, Robin; Gamble, John King; Nielsen, Erik arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1605.07674	text	January 2016
Characterizing universal gate sets via dihedral benchmarking Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud; Wallman, Joel J.; Emerson, Joseph Physical Review A, Vol. 92, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.060302	journal	December 2015
Quantum operation time reversal Crooks, Gavin E. Physical Review A, Vol. 77, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.034101	journal	March 2008
An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control fidelity Veldhorst, M.; Hwang, J. C. C.; Yang, C. H. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1407.1950	text	January 2014
Non-exponential Fidelity Decay in Randomized Benchmarking with Low-Frequency Noise Fogarty, M. A.; Veldhorst, M.; Harper, R. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1502.05119	text	January 2015
Randomized benchmarking with confidence Wallman, Joel J.; Flammia, Steven T. New Journal of Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103032	journal	October 2014
Scalable Noise Estimation with Random Unitary Operators Emerson, Joseph; Alicki, Robert; Zyczkowski, Karol arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0503243	text	January 2005
Choi matrices, norms and entanglement associated with positive maps on matrix algebras Skowronek, Łukasz; Størmer, Erling Journal of Functional Analysis, Vol. 262, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2011.09.022	journal	January 2012
Randomized Benchmarking of Single-Qubit Gates in a 2D Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits Xia, T.; Lichtman, M.; Maller, K. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 114, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.100503	journal	March 2015
Self-Consistent Quantum Process Tomography Merkel, Seth T.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Smolin, John A. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1211.0322	text	January 2012
Randomized benchmarking in measurement-based quantum computing Alexander, Rafael N.; Turner, Peter S.; Bartlett, Stephen D. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1605.08053	text	January 2016
Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators Emerson, Joseph; Alicki, Robert; Życzkowski, Karol Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, Vol. 7, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/021	journal	September 2005
Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits Córcoles, A. D.; Magesan, Easwar; Srinivasan, Srikanth J. Nature Communications, Vol. 6, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7979	journal	April 2015
Estimating the coherence of noise Wallman, Joel; Granade, Chris; Harper, Robin New Journal of Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113020	journal	November 2015
Rolling quantum dice with a superconducting qubit Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Veitia, A. Physical Review A, Vol. 90, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.030303	journal	September 2014
Nonexponential fidelity decay in randomized benchmarking with low-frequency noise Fogarty, M. A.; Veldhorst, M.; Harper, R. Physical Review A, Vol. 92, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022326	journal	August 2015
Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, Jay M.; Emerson, Joseph Physical Review A, Vol. 85, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.042311	journal	April 2012
Robust Extraction of Tomographic Information via Randomized Benchmarking Kimmel, Shelby; da Silva, Marcus P.; Ryan, Colm A. Physical Review X, Vol. 4, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011050	journal	March 2014
Estimating the Coherence of Noise Wallman, Joel J.; Granade, Christopher; Harper, Robin arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1503.07865	text	January 2015
Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking Córcoles, A. D.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Chow, Jerry M. Physical Review A, Vol. 87, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.030301	journal	March 2013
Demonstration of robust quantum gate tomography via randomized benchmarking Johnson, Blake R.; Silva, Marcus P. da; Ryan, Colm A. New Journal of Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113019	journal	November 2015
Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking Kelly, J.; Barends, R.; Campbell, B. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 112, Issue 24 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240504	journal	June 2014
Robust Characterization of Loss Rates Wallman, Joel J.; Barnhill, Marie; Emerson, Joseph Physical Review Letters, Vol. 115, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.060501	journal	August 2015
Self-consistent quantum process tomography Merkel, Seth T.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Smolin, John A. Physical Review A, Vol. 87, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.062119	journal	June 2013
Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking Sheldon, Sarah; Bishop, Lev S.; Magesan, Easwar Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012301	journal	January 2016
Quantifying the quantum gate fidelity of single-atom spin qubits in silicon by randomized benchmarking Muhonen, J. T.; Laucht, A.; Simmons, S. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 27, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/15/154205	journal	March 2015
Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, J. M.; Emerson, Joseph Physical Review Letters, Vol. 106, Issue 18 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180504	journal	May 2011
Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, Jay M.; Johnson, B. R. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505	journal	August 2012
Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes Emerson, J.; Silva, M.; Moussa, O. Science, Vol. 317, Issue 5846 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1145699	journal	September 2007
Randomized benchmarking in measurement-based quantum computing Alexander, Rafael N.; Turner, Peter S.; Bartlett, Stephen D. Physical Review A, Vol. 94, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.032303	journal	September 2016
Quantum Error Correction Gottesman, Daniel The University of British Columbia https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0040931	text	January 2010
Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking Gambetta, Jay M.; Córcoles, A. D.; Merkel, S. T. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 24 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.240504	journal	December 2012
Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes Gilchrist, Alexei; Langford, Nathan K.; Nielsen, Michael A. Physical Review A, Vol. 71, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062310	journal	June 2005
Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit Chen, Zijun; Kelly, Julian; Quintana, Chris arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1509.05470	text	January 2015
Demonstration of non-Markovian process characterisation and control on a quantum processor White, G. A. L.; Hill, C. D.; Pollock, F. A. Nature Communications, Vol. 11, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20113-3	journal	December 2020
Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices Choi, Man-Duen Linear Algebra and its Applications, Vol. 10, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0	journal	June 1975
Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit Chen, Zijun; Kelly, Julian; Quintana, Chris Physical Review Letters, Vol. 116, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020501	journal	January 2016
Randomized benchmarking of single qubit gates in a 2D array of neutral atom qubits Xia, T.; Lichtman, M.; Maller, K. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1501.02041	text	January 2015
Quantum Error Correction Lidar, Daniel A.; Brun, Todd A. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139034807	book	September 2013
Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation Dankert, Christoph; Cleve, Richard; Emerson, Joseph Physical Review A, Vol. 80, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012304	journal	July 2009
Electrically controlling single-spin qubits in a continuous microwave field Laucht, Arne; Muhonen, Juha T.; Mohiyaddin, Fahd A. Science Advances, Vol. 1, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500022	journal	April 2015
Accelerated randomized benchmarking Granade, Christopher; Ferrie, Christopher; Cory, D. G. New Journal of Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013042	journal	January 2015
Effect of noise correlations on randomized benchmarking Ball, Harrison; Stace, Thomas M.; Flammia, Steven T. Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.022303	journal	February 2016
Enhanced energy-constrained quantum communication over bosonic Gaussian channels Noh, Kyungjoo; Pirandola, Stefano; Jiang, Liang Nature Communications, Vol. 11, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14329-6	journal	January 2020
Bootstrapping quantum process tomography via a perturbative ansatz Govia, L. C. G.; Ribeill, G. J.; Ristè, D. Nature Communications, Vol. 11, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14873-1	journal	February 2020
Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates Cross, Andrew W.; Magesan, Easwar; Bishop, Lev S. npj Quantum Information, Vol. 2, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2016.12	journal	April 2016
Robust Extraction of Tomographic Information via Randomized Benchmarking Kimmel, Shelby; da Silva, Marcus P.; Ryan, Colm A. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1306.2348	text	January 2013
Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates Knill, E.; Leibfried, D.; Reichle, R. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.0707.0963	text	January 2007
Randomized Benchmarking with Confidence Wallman, Joel J.; Flammia, Steven T. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1404.6025	text	January 2014
Quantum computation and quantum information† Nagy, Marius; Akl, Selim G. International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, Vol. 21, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1080/17445760500355678	journal	February 2006
Notes on super-operator norms induced by Schatten norms Watrous, J. Quantum Information and Computation, Vol. 5, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC5.1-6	journal	January 2005

Cited By (30)

Theory of quantum system certification: a tutorial Kliesch, Martin; Roth, Ingo arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2010.05925	text	January 2020
Benchmarking Gate Fidelities in a Si/SiGe Two-Qubit Device Xue, X.; Watson, T. F.; Helsen, J. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1811.04002	text	January 2018
Quantum communication protocols as a benchmark for programmable quantum computers Zhukov, A. A.; Kiktenko, E. O.; Elistratov, A. A. Quantum Information Processing, Vol. 18, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-2144-y	journal	December 2018
Comparing the randomized benchmarking figure with the average infidelity of a quantum gate-set Qi, Jiaan; Ng, Hui Khoon International Journal of Quantum Information, Vol. 17, Issue 04 https://doi.org/10.1142/s021974991950031x	journal	June 2019
Efficient Estimation of Pauli Channels Flammia, Steven T.; Wallman, Joel J. ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing, Vol. 1, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1145/3408039	journal	December 2020
Direct randomized benchmarking for multi-qubit devices Proctor, Timothy J.; Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud; Rudinger, Kenneth arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07975	text	January 2018
Three Qubit Randomized Benchmarking McKay, David C.; Sheldon, Sarah; Smolin, John A. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1712.06550	text	January 2017
From randomized benchmarking experiments to gate-set circuit fidelity: how to interpret randomized benchmarking decay parameters Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud; Boone, Kristine; Wallman, Joel J. New Journal of Physics, Vol. 20, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aadcc7	journal	September 2018
Experimental quantum verification in the presence of temporally correlated noise Mavadia, S.; Edmunds, C. L.; Hempel, C. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1706.03787	text	January 2017
On the freedom in representing quantum operations Lin, Junan; Buonacorsi, Brandon; Laflamme, Raymond New Journal of Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab075a	journal	February 2019
On the freedom in representing quantum operations Lin, Junan; Buonacorsi, Brandon; Laflamme, Raymond arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1810.05631	text	January 2018
Quantum process identification: a method for characterizing non-markovian quantum dynamics Bennink, Ryan S.; Lougovski, Pavel New Journal of Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab3598	journal	August 2019
Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices Proctor, Timothy J.; Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud; Rudinger, Kenneth Physical Review Letters, Vol. 123, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.123.030503	journal	July 2019
Experimental quantum verification in the presence of temporally correlated noise Mavadia, S.; Edmunds, C. L.; Hempel, C. npj Quantum Information, Vol. 4, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0052-0	journal	February 2018
A new class of efficient randomized benchmarking protocols Helsen, Jonas; Xue, Xiao; Vandersypen, Lieven M. K. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1806.02048	preprint	January 2018
Perturbative tomography of small errors in quantum gates Yang, Ruyu; Li, Ying Physical Review A, Vol. 103, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.103.032421	journal	March 2021
Randomized benchmarking with gate-dependent noise Wallman, Joel J. Quantum, Vol. 2 https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2018-01-29-47	journal	January 2018
Character randomized benchmarking for non-multiplicity-free groups with applications to subspace, leakage, and matchgate randomized benchmarking Claes, Jahan; Rieffel, Eleanor; Wang, Zhihui arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2011.00007	text	January 2020
Benchmarking quantum tomography completeness and fidelity with machine learning Teo, Yong Siah; Shin, Seongwook; Jeong, Hyunseok arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2103.01535	text	January 2021
A new class of efficient randomized benchmarking protocols Helsen, Jonas; Xue, Xiao; Vandersypen, Lieven M. K. npj Quantum Information, Vol. 5, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0182-7	journal	August 2019
Measuring the Capabilities of Quantum Computers Proctor, Timothy; Rudinger, Kenneth; Young, Kevin arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2008.11294	text	January 2020
General Framework for Randomized Benchmarking Helsen, J.; Roth, Ingo; Onorati, E. Freie Universität Berlin https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35573	text	January 2022
Lightweight Detection of a Small Number of Large Errors in a Quantum Circuit Linden, Noah; de Wolf, Ronald Quantum, Vol. 5 https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-04-20-436	journal	April 2021
Approximate randomized benchmarking for finite groups França, D. S.; Hashagen, A. K. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Vol. 51, Issue 39 https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aad6fa	journal	August 2018
Efficient verification of bosonic quantum channels via benchmarking Wu, Ya-Dong; Sanders, Barry C. New Journal of Physics, Vol. 21, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab2d3a	journal	July 2019
Demonstration of Fidelity Improvement Using Dynamical Decoupling with Superconducting Qubits Pokharel, Bibek; Anand, Namit; Fortman, Benjamin Physical Review Letters, Vol. 121, Issue 22 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.121.220502	journal	November 2018
Noise tailoring for quantum circuits via unitary 2t-design Zhang, Linxi; Yu, Yan; Zhu, Changhua Scientific Reports, Vol. 9, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38158-2	journal	February 2019
Experimental demonstration of Pauli-frame randomization on a superconducting qubit Ware, Matthew; Ribeill, Guilhem; Ristè, Diego arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1803.01818	text	January 2018
Dynamically corrected gates suppress spatio-temporal error correlations as measured by randomized benchmarking Edmunds, C. L.; Hempel, C.; Harris, R. J. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1909.10727	text	January 2019
Quantum communication protocols as a benchmark for quantum computers Zhukov, A. A.; Kiktenko, E. O.; Elistratov, A. A. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1812.00587	text	January 2018

Similar Records

What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Conference · 2017 · OSTI ID:1427336

Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; Young, Kevin; +2 more

Randomized Benchmarking doesn?t measure what you (probably) think it does.

Conference · 2016 · OSTI ID:1412086

Blume-Kohout, Robin J; Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; +2 more

What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures

Journal Article · 2017 · Physical Review Letters · OSTI ID:1406360

Proctor, Timothy; Rudinger, Kenneth; Young, Kevin; +2 more

What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Citation Formats

References (62)

Cited By (30)

Similar Records

Related Subjects