skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Reconstructing small-scale lenses from the cosmic microwave background temperature fluctuations

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz566· OSTI ID:1503398
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  2. Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
  3. Berkeley Center for Cosmological Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK

Cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing is a powerful probe of the matter distribution in the Universe. The standard quadratic estimator, which is typically used to measure the lensing signal, is known to be suboptimal for low-noise polarization data from next-generation experiments. In this paper, we explain why the quadratic estimator will also be suboptimal for measuring lensing on very small scales, even for measurements in temperature where this estimator typically performs well. Though maximum likelihood methods could be implemented to improve performance, we explore a much simpler solution, revisiting a previously proposed method to measure lensing that involves a direct inversion of the background gradient. An important application of this simple formalism is the measurement of cluster masses with CMB lensing. We find that directly applying a gradient inversion matched filter to simulated lensed images of the CMB can tighten constraints on cluster masses compared to the quadratic estimator. While the difference is not relevant for existing surveys, for future surveys it can translate to significant improvements in mass calibration for distant clusters, where galaxy lensing calibration is ineffective due to the lack of enough resolved background galaxies. Improvements can be as large as $${\sim } 50{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$$ for a cluster at z = 2 and a next-generation CMB experiment with 1 $$\mu$$K arcmin noise, and over an order of magnitude for lower noise levels. For future surveys, this simple matched filter or gradient inversion method approaches the performance of maximum likelihood methods, at a fraction of the computational cost.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1503398
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1503710; OSTI ID: 1577637; OSTI ID: 1616081
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 485 Journal Issue: 3; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Royal Astronomical SocietyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 12 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (32)

Reconstruction of lensing from the cosmic microwave background polarization journal October 2003
Using the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect to determine the peculiar velocities of clusters of galaxies journal March 1996
Cluster lensing of the CMB journal November 2004
Improved estimation of cluster mass profiles from the cosmic microwave background journal October 2008
Cosmology and astrophysics from relaxed galaxy clusters – II. Cosmological constraints journal April 2014
Mass Reconstruction with Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization journal August 2002
Lensing reconstruction of cluster-mass cross correlation with cosmic microwave background polarization journal June 2010
Gravitational Lensing Effect on Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies: A Power Spectrum Approach journal May 1996
Analyzing weak lensing of the cosmic microwave background using the likelihood function journal February 2003
Gravitational lensing of the CMB by galaxy clusters journal May 2005
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering journal December 1997
Weak gravitational lensing of the CMB journal June 2006
A Measurement of Gravitational Lensing of the Cosmic Microwave Background by Galaxy Clusters Using data from the South pole Telescope journal June 2015
Small-scale fluctuations of relic radiation journal April 1970
Lensing‐induced Cluster Signatures in the Cosmic Microwave Background journal July 2000
Delensing CMB polarization with external datasets journal June 2012
Internal delensing of Planck CMB temperature and polarization journal May 2017
HEALPix: A Framework for High‐Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere journal April 2005
Maximum a posteriori CMB lensing reconstruction journal September 2017
Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters journal October 2014
Weighing the Giants – I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images journal February 2014
Calibrating cluster number counts with CMB lensing journal February 2017
Gravitational Lensing of the Microwave Background by Galaxy Clusters journal November 2004
Cluster mass estimators from CMB temperature and polarization lensing journal December 2007
Gravitational lensing effect on cosmic microwave background polarization journal June 1998
Planck 2015 results : XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts journal September 2016
Evidence of Lensing of the Cosmic Microwave Background by Dark Matter Halos journal April 2015
Measuring cluster masses with CMB lensing: a statistical approach journal May 2015
Cluster masses from CMB and galaxy weak lensing journal March 2006
CMB-cluster lensing journal July 2004
Fundamental physics from future weak-lensing calibrated Sunyaev-Zel’dovich galaxy cluster counts journal November 2017
Measuring galaxy cluster masses with CMB lensing using a Maximum Likelihood estimator: statistical and systematic error budgets for future experiments journal August 2017