skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mechanism of the G-protein mimetic nanobody binding to a muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor

Journal Article · · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ORCiD logo [1];  [2]
  1. Univ. of Kansas, Lawrence, KS (United States). Center for Computational Biology and Dept. of Molecular Biosciences
  2. Univ. of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA (United States). Dept. of Pharmacology and Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Protein–protein binding is key in cellular signaling processes. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of protein–protein binding, however, are challenging due to limited timescales. In particular, binding of the medically important G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with intracellular signaling proteins has not been simulated with MD to date. Here, we report a successful simulation of the binding of a G-protein mimetic nanobody to the M2 muscarinic GPCR using the robust Gaussian accelerated MD (GaMD) method. Through long-timescale GaMD simulations over 4,500 ns, the nanobody was observed to bind the receptor intracellular G-protein-coupling site, with a minimum rmsd of 2.48 Å in the nanobody core domain compared with the X-ray structure. Binding of the nanobody allosterically closed the orthosteric ligand-binding pocket, being consistent with the recent experimental finding. In the absence of nanobody binding, the receptor orthosteric pocket sampled open and fully open conformations. The GaMD simulations revealed two low-energy intermediate states during nanobody binding to the M2 receptor. The flexible receptor intracellular loops contribute remarkable electrostatic, polar, and hydrophobic residue interactions in recognition and binding of the nanobody. As a result, these simulations provided important insights into the mechanism of GPCR–nanobody binding and demonstrated the applicability of GaMD in modeling dynamic protein–protein interactions.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE
OSTI ID:
1498119
Journal Information:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 115, Issue 12; ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher:
National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC (United States)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 71 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (37)

Ligand-Dependent Conformations and Dynamics of the Serotonin 5-HT2A Receptor Determine Its Activation and Membrane-Driven Oligomerization Properties journal April 2012
[19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors book January 1995
Structure of a nanobody-stabilized active state of the β2 adrenoceptor journal January 2011
Activation and allosteric modulation of a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor journal November 2013
Constitutive Activity of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors journal January 2006
Can Ligands of Different Functional Types Induce Distinct Dynamics in G Protein-Coupled Receptors? journal July 2017
Ligand and Decoy Sets for Docking to G Protein-Coupled Receptors journal December 2011
Structure of the human M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor bound to an antagonist journal January 2012
Structural basis for modulation of a G-protein-coupled receptor by allosteric drugs journal October 2013
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD journal January 2005
Allosteric coupling from G protein to the agonist-binding pocket in GPCRs journal June 2016
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development journal June 2014
Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor–Gs protein complex journal July 2011
Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics: Unconstrained Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculation journal July 2015
Activation mechanism of the  2-adrenergic receptor journal October 2011
Crystal structure of opsin in its G-protein-interacting conformation journal September 2008
Molecular Basis of Receptor/G Protein Coupling Selectivity Studied by Coexpression of Wild Type and Mutant m2 Muscarinic Receptors with Mutant Gα q Subunits journal February 1997
Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules journal September 2002
Recent progress in the study of G protein-coupled receptors with molecular dynamics computer simulations journal July 2011
A Closer Look into G Protein Coupled Receptor Activation: X-Ray Crystallography and Long-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations journal March 2012
Identification of a receptor/G-protein contact site critical for signaling specificity and G-protein activation. journal December 1995
Pathway and mechanism of drug binding to G-protein-coupled receptors journal July 2011
Trends in GPCR drug discovery: new agents, targets and indications journal October 2017
Structural insights into µ-opioid receptor activation journal August 2015
G-protein coupled receptors: advances in simulation and drug discovery journal December 2016
Showcasing modern molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins through G protein-coupled receptors journal August 2011
Adrenaline-activated structure of β2-adrenoceptor stabilized by an engineered nanobody journal September 2013
Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics in NAMD journal December 2016
Structure of the adenosine A2A receptor bound to an engineered G protein journal July 2016
Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a class B GPCR–G-protein complex journal April 2017
Graded activation and free energy landscapes of a muscarinic G-protein–coupled receptor journal October 2016
Unconstrained enhanced sampling for free energy calculations of biomolecules: a review journal July 2016
Structural features of the G-protein/GPCR interactions journal January 2014
Cloud-based simulations on Google Exacycle reveal ligand modulation of GPCR activation pathways journal December 2013
CHARMM additive and polarizable force fields for biophysics and computer-aided drug design journal May 2015
Activation Mechanism of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor journal January 2012
Pathway and Mechanism of Drug Binding to G-Protein-Coupled Receptors journal January 2012

Cited By (10)

G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor–Membrane Interactions Depend on the Receptor Activation State journal October 2019
Ligand binding free energy and kinetics calculation in 2020 journal January 2020
NMR and computational methods for molecular resolution of allosteric pathways in enzyme complexes journal December 2019
Key role of the REC lobe during CRISPR–Cas9 activation by ‘sensing’, ‘regulating’, and ‘locking’ the catalytic HNH domain journal January 2018
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Allosteric Modulation of the Adenosine A2a Receptor by a Mini-G Protein journal April 2019
Encounter complexes and hidden poses of kinase-inhibitor binding on the free-energy landscape journal August 2019
Prediction of Metabolite Concentrations, Rate Constants and Post-Translational Regulation Using Maximum Entropy-Based Simulations with Application to Central Metabolism of Neurospora crassa journal May 2018
Molecular Mechanism of Off-Target Effects in CRISPR-Cas9 journal February 2019
Deciphering Off-Target Effects in CRISPR-Cas9 through Accelerated Molecular Dynamics journal March 2019
Structural Basis for Binding of Allosteric Drug Leads in the Adenosine A1 Receptor journal November 2018