skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries have great potential to satisfy the increasing demand of energy storage systems for portable devices, electric vehicles, and grid storage because of their extremely high specific capacity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. In spite of all these merits, the practical utilization of lithium–sulfur batteries is impeded by commonly known challenges, such as low sulfur utilization (<80%), short life (<200 cycles), fast capacity fade, and severe self-discharge effect, which mainly result from the i) low conductivity of the active material, ii) serious polysulfide shuttling, iii) large volume changes, and iv) lithium–metal anode contamination/corrosion. Numerous approaches are reported to effectively mitigate these issues. Indeed, such approaches have shown enhanced lithium–sulfur battery performances. However, many reports overlook the critical parameters, including sulfur loading (<13 mg cm-2), sulfur content (<70 wt%), and electrolyte/sulfur ratio (>11 µL mg-1), that significantly affect the analyzed electrochemical characteristics, energy density, and practicality of lithium–sulfur batteries. This review highlights the trends and progress in making cells fulfilling these fabrication parameters and discuss the challenges of the amount of sulfur and electrolyte in fabricating cells with practically necessary parameters and with high electrochemical utilization and efficiency.

Authors:
 [1];  [1]; ORCiD logo [1]
  1. Materials Science and Engineering Program & Texas Materials Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712 USA
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)
OSTI Identifier:
1488314
Alternate Identifier(s):
OSTI ID: 1439359; OSTI ID: 1488311; OSTI ID: 1488312; OSTI ID: 1488313
Grant/Contract Number:  
EE0007218
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Advanced Functional Materials
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 28; Journal Issue: 28; Journal ID: ISSN 1616-301X
Publisher:
Wiley
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
25 ENERGY STORAGE; 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; battery testing setting; cyclability; high loading; lithium–sulfur batteries; low electrolyte; sufficient sulfur content

Citation Formats

Chung, Sheng-Heng, Chang, Chi-Hao, and Manthiram, Arumugam. Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/adfm.201801188.
Chung, Sheng-Heng, Chang, Chi-Hao, & Manthiram, Arumugam. Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable. United States. doi:10.1002/adfm.201801188.
Chung, Sheng-Heng, Chang, Chi-Hao, and Manthiram, Arumugam. Tue . "Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable". United States. doi:10.1002/adfm.201801188.
@article{osti_1488314,
title = {Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable},
author = {Chung, Sheng-Heng and Chang, Chi-Hao and Manthiram, Arumugam},
abstractNote = {Lithium–sulfur batteries have great potential to satisfy the increasing demand of energy storage systems for portable devices, electric vehicles, and grid storage because of their extremely high specific capacity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. In spite of all these merits, the practical utilization of lithium–sulfur batteries is impeded by commonly known challenges, such as low sulfur utilization (<80%), short life (<200 cycles), fast capacity fade, and severe self-discharge effect, which mainly result from the i) low conductivity of the active material, ii) serious polysulfide shuttling, iii) large volume changes, and iv) lithium–metal anode contamination/corrosion. Numerous approaches are reported to effectively mitigate these issues. Indeed, such approaches have shown enhanced lithium–sulfur battery performances. However, many reports overlook the critical parameters, including sulfur loading (<13 mg cm-2), sulfur content (<70 wt%), and electrolyte/sulfur ratio (>11 µL mg-1), that significantly affect the analyzed electrochemical characteristics, energy density, and practicality of lithium–sulfur batteries. This review highlights the trends and progress in making cells fulfilling these fabrication parameters and discuss the challenges of the amount of sulfur and electrolyte in fabricating cells with practically necessary parameters and with high electrochemical utilization and efficiency.},
doi = {10.1002/adfm.201801188},
journal = {Advanced Functional Materials},
number = 28,
volume = 28,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue May 29 00:00:00 EDT 2018},
month = {Tue May 29 00:00:00 EDT 2018}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on May 29, 2019
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 3 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:

Works referenced in this record:

Lithium Batteries and Cathode Materials
journal, October 2004

  • Whittingham, M. Stanley
  • Chemical Reviews, Vol. 104, Issue 10, p. 4271-4302
  • DOI: 10.1021/cr020731c

Spherical Ordered Mesoporous Carbon Nanoparticles with High Porosity for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries
journal, March 2012

  • Schuster, J�rg; He, Guang; Mandlmeier, Benjamin
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Vol. 51, Issue 15, p. 3591-3595
  • DOI: 10.1002/anie.201107817

Lithium�sulphur batteries with a microporous carbon paper as a bifunctional interlayer
journal, January 2012

  • Su, Yu-Sheng; Manthiram, Arumugam
  • Nature Communications, Vol. 3, Article No. 1166
  • DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2163

Lithium Sulfur Battery: Oxidation/Reduction Mechanisms of Polysulfides in THF Solutions
journal, January 1988

  • Yamin, H.; Gorenshtein, A.; Penciner, J.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 135, Issue 5, p. 1045-1048
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.2095868

Li�O2 and Li�S batteries with high energy storage
journal, January 2012

  • Bruce, Peter G.; Freunberger, Stefan A.; Hardwick, Laurence J.
  • Nature Materials, Vol. 11, Issue 1, p. 19-29
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmat3191

High Energy Density Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: Challenges of Thick Sulfur Cathodes
journal, March 2015

  • Lv, Dongping; Zheng, Jianming; Li, Qiuyan
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 16, Article No. 1402290
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201402290

Structural Factors of Sulfur Cathodes with Poly(ethylene oxide) Binder for Performance of Rechargeable Lithium Sulfur Batteries
journal, January 2002

  • Cheon, Sang-Eun; Cho, Ji-Hoon; Ko, Ki-Seok
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 149, Issue 11, p. A1437-A1441
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1511187

Lithium-Sulfur Cells: The Gap between the State-of-the-Art and the Requirements for High Energy Battery Cells
journal, April 2015

  • Hagen, Markus; Hanselmann, Dominik; Ahlbrecht, Katharina
  • Advanced Energy Materials, Vol. 5, Issue 16, 1401986
  • DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201401986

Rechargeable Lithium Sulfur Battery
journal, May 2003

  • Cheon, Sang-Eun; Ko, Ki-Seok; Cho, Ji-Hoon
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 150, Issue 6, p. A800-A805
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1571533

On the Surface Chemical Aspects of Very High Energy Density, Rechargeable Li–Sulfur Batteries
journal, January 2009

  • Aurbach, Doron; Pollak, Elad; Elazari, Ran
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 156, Issue 8, p. A694-A702
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.3148721

Polysulfide Shuttle Study in the Li/S Battery System
journal, January 2004

  • Mikhaylik, Yuriy V.; Akridge, James R.
  • Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 151, Issue 11, p. A1969-A1976
  • DOI: 10.1149/1.1806394

Sulfur-Impregnated Activated Carbon Fiber Cloth as a Binder-Free Cathode for Rechargeable Li-S Batteries
journal, November 2011

  • Elazari, Ran; Salitra, Gregory; Garsuch, Arnd
  • Advanced Materials, Vol. 23, Issue 47, p. 5641-5644
  • DOI: 10.1002/adma.201103274

Electrochemical Energy Storage for Green Grid
journal, May 2011

  • Yang, Zhenguo; Zhang, Jianlu; Kintner-Meyer, Michael C. W.
  • Chemical Reviews, Vol. 111, Issue 5, p. 3577-3613
  • DOI: 10.1021/cr100290v

Advances in Li�S batteries
journal, January 2010

  • Ji, Xiulei; Nazar, Linda F.
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry, Vol. 20, Issue 44, p. 9821-9826
  • DOI: 10.1039/b925751a

Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: Fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions
journal, June 2013


A highly ordered nanostructured carbon�sulphur cathode for lithium�sulphur batteries
journal, May 2009

  • Ji, Xiulei; Lee, Kyu Tae; Nazar, Linda F.
  • Nature Materials, Vol. 8, Issue 6, p. 500-506
  • DOI: 10.1038/nmat2460