skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Modelling projection effects in optically selected cluster catalogues

Journal Article · · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
 [1];  [2];  [3]; ORCiD logo [4];  [5];  [5]; ORCiD logo [6]; ORCiD logo [3]; ORCiD logo [7];  [6];  [2];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [12]
  1. Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheiner str 1, D-81679 München, Germany
  2. Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
  3. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, P. O. Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
  4. Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
  5. Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
  6. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, P. O. Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, Department of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  7. Department of Physics, McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
  8. Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheiner str 1, D-81679 München, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  9. Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheiner str 1, D-81679 München, Germany, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P. O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
  10. Universitäts-Sternwarte, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Scheiner str 1, D-81679 München, Germany, Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstrasse, D-85748 Garching, Germany, Excellence Cluster Universe, Boltzmann str 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  11. Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology, P. O. Box 2450, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA, Department of Physics, Stanford University, 382 Via Pueblo Mall, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
  12. Laboratorio Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia - LineA, Rua General Jose Cristino, 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20921-400, Brazil

The cosmological utility of galaxy cluster catalogues is primarily limited by our ability to calibrate the relation between halo mass and observable mass proxies such as cluster richness, X-ray luminosity or the Sunyaev-Zeldovich signal. Projection effects are a particularly pernicious systematic effect that can impact observable mass proxies; structure along the line of sight can both bias and increase the scatter of the observable mass proxies used in cluster abundance studies. In this work, we develop an empirical method to characterize the impact of projection effects on redMaPPer cluster catalogues. We use numerical simulations to validate our method and illustrate its robustness. We demonstrate that modeling of projection effects is a necessary component for cluster abundance studies capable of reaching $$\approx 5\%$$ mass calibration uncertainties (e.g. the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 sample). Specifically, ignoring the impact of projection effects in the observable--mass relation --- i.e. marginalizing over a log-normal model only --- biases the posterior of the cluster normalization condition $$S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{1/2}$$ by $$\Delta S_8 =0.05$$, more than twice the uncertainty in the posterior for such an analysis.

Research Organization:
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States); Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), High Energy Physics (HEP)
Contributing Organization:
DES
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0015975; AC02-76SF00515; FG-2016-6443; PF5-160138; NAS8-03060; SC0010118; AST-1138766; AST-1536171; AYA2015-71825; ESP2015-66861; FPA2015-68048; SEV-2016-0588; SEV-2016-0597; MDM-2015-0509; FP7/2007-2013; 240672; 291329; 306478; CE110001020; AC02-07CH11359
OSTI ID:
1479165
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1493428; OSTI ID: 1497406
Report Number(s):
arXiv:1807.07072; FERMILAB-PUB-18-325; DES-2017-0318
Journal Information:
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal Name: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Vol. 482 Journal Issue: 1; ISSN 0035-8711
Publisher:
Oxford University PressCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 36 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (38)

The Eighth data Release of the Sloan Digital sky Survey: First data from Sdss-Iii journal March 2011
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
Constraining the mass–richness relationship of redMaPPer clusters with angular clustering journal August 2016
The Rockstar Phase-Space Temporal halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores journal December 2012
AMICO: optimized detection of galaxy clusters in photometric surveys journal October 2017
Assembly bias and splashback in galaxy clusters journal June 2017
Red-sequence cluster finding in the Millennium Simulation journal December 2007
Influence of projection in cluster cosmology studies journal November 2011
Galaxy cluster mass estimation from stacked spectroscopic analysis journal May 2016
emcee : The MCMC Hammer
  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925 https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
journal March 2013
The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: First Results on Galaxy Groups journal May 2005
A New Method For Galaxy Cluster Detection. I. The Algorithm journal October 2000
A Gmbcg Galaxy Cluster Catalog of 55,424 rich Clusters from sdss dr7 journal November 2010
Testing redMaPPer centring probabilities using galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing journal July 2018
Luminous red galaxies in clusters: central occupation, spatial distributions and miscentring journal July 2015
Sample Variance Considerations for Cluster Surveys journal February 2003
Formation of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2012
Weighing the giants – IV. Cosmology and neutrino mass journal November 2014
The C4 Clustering Algorithm: Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal September 2005
Planck 2015 results : XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts journal September 2016
redMaPPer II: X-RAY AND SZ PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS FOR THE SDSS CATALOG journal February 2014
IMPROVEMENT OF THE RICHNESS ESTIMATES OF maxBCG CLUSTERS journal August 2009
COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY MaxBCG CLUSTER CATALOG journal December 2009
Extrinsic Sources of Scatter in the Richness-Mass Relation of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
redMaPPer – IV. Photometric membership identification of red cluster galaxies with 1 per cent precision journal August 2015
Robust Optical Richness Estimation with Reduced Scatter journal February 2012
redMaPPer. I. ALGORITHM AND SDSS DR8 CATALOG journal April 2014
The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data journal May 2016
The X-CLASS−redMaPPer galaxy cluster comparison: I. Identification procedures journal November 2014
Weak lensing measurement of the mass–richness relation of SDSS redMaPPer clusters journal December 2016
The Voronoi Tessellation Cluster Finder in 2+1 Dimensions journal December 2010
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2 journal December 2005
Projection effects in cluster catalogues journal June 1997
CHANDRA CLUSTER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. II. SAMPLES AND X-RAY DATA REDUCTION journal February 2009
On the level of cluster assembly bias in SDSS journal May 2017
Planck 2015 results : VI. LFI mapmaking journal September 2016
Planck 2015 results : XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity journal September 2016
Planck 2015 results : XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters journal September 2016

Cited By (33)

Detection of anti-correlation of hot and cold baryons in galaxy clusters journal July 2019
The X-CLASS−redMaPPer galaxy cluster comparison: I. Identification procedures journal November 2014
Planck 2015 results : XXIV. Cosmology from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts journal September 2016
A New Method For Galaxy Cluster Detection. I. The Algorithm journal October 2000
Sample Variance Considerations for Cluster Surveys journal February 2003
The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: First Results on Galaxy Groups journal May 2005
The C4 Clustering Algorithm: Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey journal September 2005
emcee : The MCMC Hammer
  • Foreman-Mackey, Daniel; Hogg, David W.; Lang, Dustin
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Vol. 125, Issue 925 https://doi.org/10.1086/670067
journal March 2013
A Gmbcg Galaxy Cluster Catalog of 55,424 rich Clusters from sdss dr7 journal November 2010
The Eighth data Release of the Sloan Digital sky Survey: First data from Sdss-Iii journal March 2011
Projection effects in cluster catalogues journal June 1997
Weighing the giants – IV. Cosmology and neutrino mass journal November 2014
Luminous red galaxies in clusters: central occupation, spatial distributions and miscentring journal July 2015
redMaPPer – IV. Photometric membership identification of red cluster galaxies with 1 per cent precision journal August 2015
Galaxy cluster mass estimation from stacked spectroscopic analysis journal May 2016
Constraining the mass–richness relationship of redMaPPer clusters with angular clustering journal August 2016
Weak lensing measurement of the mass–richness relation of SDSS redMaPPer clusters journal December 2016
On the level of cluster assembly bias in SDSS journal May 2017
Assembly bias and splashback in galaxy clusters journal June 2017
AMICO: optimized detection of galaxy clusters in photometric surveys journal October 2017
Testing redMaPPer centring probabilities using galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing journal July 2018
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2 journal December 2005
Red-sequence cluster finding in the Millennium Simulation journal December 2007
Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2011
Formation of Galaxy Clusters journal September 2012
The Redmapper Galaxy Cluster Catalog from des Science Verification data journal May 2016
Projection effects in galaxy cluster samples: insights from X-ray redshifts journal June 2019
Dark Energy Surveyed Year 1 results: calibration of cluster mis-centring in the redMaPPer catalogues journal May 2019
Methods for cluster cosmology and application to the SDSS in preparation for DES Year 1 release journal July 2019
Mass variance from archival X-ray properties of Dark Energy Survey Year-1 galaxy clusters journal September 2019
Mass calibration of the CODEX cluster sample using SPIDERS spectroscopy – I. The richness–mass relation journal March 2019
The mass–richness relation of optically selected clusters from weak gravitational lensing and abundance with Subaru HSC first-year data journal September 2019
Chandra Follow-up of the SDSS DR8 Redmapper Catalog Using the MATCha Pipeline journal September 2019

Figures / Tables (12)


Similar Records

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances and weak lensing
Journal Article · Tue Jul 07 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · Physical Review D · OSTI ID:1479165

Exploring the contamination of the DES-Y1 cluster sample with SPT-SZ selected clusters
Journal Article · Thu Mar 25 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1479165

μ⋆ masses: weak-lensing calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 redMaPPer clusters using stellar masses
Journal Article · Mon Sep 07 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · OSTI ID:1479165