skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Seismic Models for Near-Surface Explosion Yield Estimation in Alluvium and Sedimentary Rock

Journal Article · · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170145· OSTI ID:1466172
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  2. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency, Kirtland AFB, NM (United States)
+ Show Author Affiliations

Seismic ground-motion data provide valuable constraints on explosion characteristics, such as yield and height-of-burst/depth-of-burial (HOB/DOB). This study investigated a range of seismic amplitude features and their efficacy in minimizing errors associated with yield estimation. Using a set of explosion recordings from experiments conducted in alluvium and sedimentary rock geologies, we investigated the effectiveness of three different seismic feature types over a range of different frequencies. Using both velocity and displacement data, we investigated the zero-to-peak (ZTP) amplitude of the first arriving P wave, the peak-to-peak (PTP) amplitude of the first arriving P wave, and the Prmsamplitude over various time windows starting with the P wave. These three basic features were measured on both vertical component only data and the vertical–radial vector sum. In total, there were 56 different combinations investigated. Our seismic models combine the effects of scaled range and scaled HOB/DOB on the observed seismic features. The results show that the vertical–radial vector sum of the ZTP amplitudes measured on displacement seismograms most consistently produce models with the smallest difference between predicted amplitude values and observed amplitude values when accounting for both alluvium and sedimentary rock lithology. The improvement in fit to the data when incorporating the difference in source lithology is significant. If an alluvium lithology is assumed for a sedimentary rock lithology, the difference in yield could be up to ~3.0 times the appropriate yield in the far field.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344; AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1466172
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1479410
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-725844; 875462
Journal Information:
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 108, Issue 3A; ISSN 0037-1106
Publisher:
Seismological Society of AmericaCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 3 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Figures / Tables (33)

Table 1(p. 35)table Table 1
Table 2(p. 35)table Table 2
Table 3(p. 36)table Table 3
Table 4(p. 36)table Table 4
Table 5(p. 37)table Table 5
Table 6(p. 37)table Table 6
Table 7(p. 38)table Table 7
Table 8(p. 38)table Table 8
Table 9(p. 39)table Table 9
Table 10(p. 40)table Table 10
Table 11(p. 41)table Table 11
Table 12(p. 41)table Table 12
Table 13(p. 42)table Table 13
Table 14(p. 42)table Table 14
Table 15(p. 42)table Table 15
Figure 1(p. 49)figure Figure 1
Figure 2(p. 50)figure Figure 2
Figure 3(p. 51)figure Figure 3
Figure 4(p. 52)figure Figure 4
Figure 5(p. 53)figure Figure 5
Figure 6(p. 54)figure Figure 6
Figure 7(p. 55)figure Figure 7
Figure 8(p. 56)figure Figure 8
Figure 9(p. 57)figure Figure 9
Figure 10(p. 58)figure Figure 10
Figure 11(p. 59)figure Figure 11
Figure 12(p. 60)figure Figure 12
Figure 13(p. 61)figure Figure 13
Figure 14(p. 62)figure Figure 14
Figure 15(p. 63)figure Figure 15
Figure 16(p. 64)figure Figure 16
Figure 17(p. 65)figure Figure 17
Figure 18(p. 66)figure Figure 18

Similar Records

Related Subjects

58 GEOSCIENCES