Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: II. Nuclear interactions with the interstellar gas

Evoli, Carmelo; Gaggero, Daniele; Vittino, Andrea; Di Mauro, Mattia; Grasso, Dario; Mazziotta, Mario Nicola

doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/006

Title: Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: II. Nuclear interactions with the interstellar gas

Journal Article · Mon Jul 02 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/07/006· OSTI ID:1461832

^[1]; Gaggero, Daniele ^[2]; Vittino, Andrea ^[3]; Di Mauro, Mattia ^[4]; Grasso, Dario ^[5]; Mazziotta, Mario Nicola ^[6]

Gran Sasso Science Inst. and National Inst. of Nuclear Physics (INFN), L'Aquila (Italy). Gran Sasso National Lab. (INFN-LNGS)
Univ. of Amsterdam (Netherlands). Inst. of Physics and Gravitation & Astroparticle Physics Amsterdam (GRAPPA)
Technical Univ. Munchen, Garching (Germany). Dept. of Physics; RWTH Aachen Univ. (Germany). Inst. for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology (TTK)
SLAC National Accelerator Lab. and Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA (United States). W.W. Hansen Experimental Physics Lab., Kavli Inst. for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology and Dept. of Physics
National Inst. of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Pisa (Italy)
National Inst. of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Bari (Italy)

Understanding the isotopic composition of cosmic rays (CRs) observed near Earth represents a milestone towards the identification of their origin. Local fluxes contain all the known stable and long-lived isotopes, reflecting the complex history of primaries and secondaries as they traverse the interstellar medium. For that reason, a numerical code which aims at describing the CR transport in the Galaxy must unavoidably rely on accurate modelling of the production of secondary particles. Here, we provide a detailed description of the nuclear cross sections and decay network as implemented in the forthcoming release of the galactic propagation code DRAGON2. We present the secondary production models implemented in the code and we apply the different prescriptions to compute quantities of interest to interpret local CR fluxes (e.g., nuclear fragmentation timescales, secondary and tertiary source terms). In particular, we develop a nuclear secondary production model aimed at accurately computing the light secondary fluxes (namely: Li, Be, B) above 1 GeV/n. This result is achieved by fitting existing empirical or semi-empirical formalisms to a large sample of measurements in the energy range 100 MeV/n to 100 GeV/n and by considering the contribution of the most relevant decaying isotopes up to iron. Concerning secondary antiparticles (positrons and antiprotons), we describe a collection of models taken from the literature, and provide a detailed quantitative comparison.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (SLAC), Menlo Park, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE; European Commission (EC); German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF); National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-76SF00515; 751311; 81303

OSTI ID:: 1461832

Journal Information:: Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2018, Issue 07; ISSN 1475-7516

Publisher:: Institute of Physics (IOP)Copyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 33 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (93)

First Result from the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer on the International Space Station: Precision Measurement of the Positron Fraction in Primary Cosmic Rays of 0.5–350 GeV Aguilar, M.; Alberti, G.; Alpat, B. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 110, Issue 14 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.141102	journal	April 2013
The results from BESS-Polar experiment Abe, K.; Fuke, H.; Haino, S. Advances in Space Research, Vol. 60, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.11.004	journal	August 2017
The DArk Matter Particle Explorer mission Chang, J.; Ambrosi, G.; An, Q. Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 95 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.08.005	journal	October 2017
Cosmic Ray Energetics And Mass for the International Space Station (ISS-CREAM) Seo, E. S.; Anderson, T.; Angelaszek, D. Advances in Space Research, Vol. 53, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.01.013	journal	May 2014
Cosmic-Ray Positron Energy Spectrum Measured by PAMELA Adriani, O.; Barbarino, G. C.; Bazilevskaya, G. A. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 111, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.081102	journal	August 2013
Propagation of Cosmic‐Ray Nucleons in the Galaxy Strong, Andrew W.; Moskalenko, Igor V. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 509, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/306470	journal	December 1998
Production and Propagation of Cosmic‐Ray Positrons and Electrons Moskalenko, I. V.; Strong, A. W. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 493, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/305152	journal	February 1998
Cosmic Rays below Z = 30 in a Diffusion Model: New Constraints on Propagation Parameters Maurin, D.; Donato, F.; Taillet, R. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 555, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/321496	journal	July 2001
PICARD: A novel code for the Galactic Cosmic Ray propagation problem Kissmann, R. Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.02.002	journal	March 2014
Spiral arms as cosmic ray source distributions Werner, M.; Kissmann, R.; Strong, A. W. Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 64 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.10.005	journal	April 2015
Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: I. numerical solver and astrophysical ingredients Evoli, Carmelo; Gaggero, Daniele; Vittino, Andrea Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 02 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/015	journal	February 2017
Propagation of heavy cosmic-ray nuclei Letaw, J. R.; Silberberg, R.; Tsao, C. H. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 56 https://doi.org/10.1086/190989	journal	November 1984
AMS-02 antiprotons, at last! Secondary astrophysical component and immediate implications for Dark Matter Giesen, Gaëlle; Boudaud, Mathieu; Génolini, Yoann Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 09 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/9/023	journal	September 2015
Secondary antiprotons as a Galactic Dark Matter probe Evoli, Carmelo; Gaggero, Daniele; Grasso, Dario Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2015, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/039	journal	December 2015
Cosmic ray antiprotons at high energies Winkler, Martin Wolfgang Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2017, Issue 02 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2017/02/048	journal	February 2017
Origin of the Positron Excess in Cosmic Rays Blasi, Pasquale Physical Review Letters, Vol. 103, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.051104	journal	July 2009
Production of secondary particles and nuclei in cosmic rays collisions with the interstellar gas using the FLUKA code Mazziotta, M. N.; Cerutti, F.; Ferrari, A. Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.04.005	journal	August 2016
Electron capture decay of cosmic rays Letaw, John R.; Adams, J. H.; Silberberg, Rein Astrophysics and Space Science, Vol. 114, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00653983	journal	September 1985
Measurement of C 12 , O 16 , and Fe 56 charge changing cross sections in helium at high energy, comparison with cross sections in hydrogen, and application to cosmic-ray propagation Ferrando, P.; Webber, W. R.; Goret, P. Physical Review C, Vol. 37, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.37.1490	journal	April 1988
Radial distribution of the diffuse $γ$ -ray emissivity in the Galactic disk Yang, Ruizhi; Aharonian, Felix; Evoli, Carmelo Physical Review D, Vol. 93, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.123007	journal	June 2016
Parametrization of gamma-ray production cross sections for $p p$ interactions in a broad proton energy range from the kinematic threshold to PeV energies Kafexhiu, Ervin; Aharonian, Felix; Taylor, Andrew M. Physical Review D, Vol. 90, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.123014	journal	December 2014
Calculation of the equilibrium antiproton spectrum Tan, L. C.; Ng, L. K. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear Physics, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4616/9/2/015	journal	February 1983
Non-parametric determination of H and He interstellar fluxes from cosmic-ray data Ghelfi, A.; Barao, F.; Derome, L. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 591 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527852	journal	June 2016
The measurement of isotopic cross sections of 12 C beam fragmentation on liquid hydrogen at 3.66 GeV/nucleon Korejwo, A.; Dzikowski, T.; Giller, M. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 26, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/26/8/306	journal	June 2000
Isotopic cross sections of 12C fragmentation on hydrogen measured at 1.87 and 2.69 GeV/nucleon Korejwo, A.; Giller, M.; Dzikowski, T. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, Vol. 28, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/28/6/304	journal	April 2002
Nuclear Reactions at High Energies Serber, R. Physical Review, Vol. 72, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.72.1114	journal	December 1947
The nuclear symmetry energy Baldo, M.; Burgio, G. F. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.06.006	journal	November 2016
Partial Cross-Sections in High-Energy Nuclear Reactions, and Astrophysical Applications. I. Targets WITh Z <= 28. II. Targets Heavier than Nickel Silberberg, R.; Tsao, C. H. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 25 https://doi.org/10.1086/190271	journal	April 1973
Measurement of charge changing and isotopic cross sections at ∼600 MeV/nucleon from the interactions of ∼30 separate beams of relativistic nuclei from 10 B to 55 Mn in a liquid hydrogen target Webber, W. R.; Soutoul, A.; Kish, J. C. Physical Review C, Vol. 58, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.3539	journal	December 1998
Production Cross Sections of Fragments from Beams of 400–650 MeV per Nucleon 9 Be, 11 B, 12 C, 14 N, 15 N, 16 O, 20 Ne, 22 Ne, 56 Fe, and 58 Ni Nuclei Interacting in a Liquid Hydrogen Target. I. Charge Changing and Total Cross Sections Webber, W. R.; Kish, J. C.; Rockstroh, J. M. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 508, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/306445	journal	December 1998
Production Cross Sections of Fragments from Beams of 400–650 MeV per Nucleon 9 Be, 11 B, 12 C, 14 N, 15 N, 16 O, 20 Ne, 22 Ne, 56 Fe, and 58 Ni Nuclei Interacting in a Liquid Hydrogen Target. II. Isotopic Cross Sections of Fragments Webber, W. R.; Kish, J. C.; Rockstroh, J. M. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 508, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/306446	journal	December 1998
Updated Formula for Calculating Partial Cross Sections for Nuclear Reactions of Nuclei with Z ≤ 28 and E > 150 MeV Nucleon −1 in Hydrogen Targets Webber, W. R.; Soutoul, A.; Kish, J. C. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, Vol. 144, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/344051	journal	January 2003
Challenging Cosmic‐Ray Propagation with Antiprotons: Evidence for a “Fresh” Nuclei Component? Moskalenko, Igor V.; Strong, Andrew W.; Mashnik, Stepan G. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 586, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/367697	journal	April 2003
Towards a More Complete and Accurate Experimental Nuclear Reaction Data Library (EXFOR): International Collaboration Between Nuclear Reaction Data Centres (NRDC) Otuka, N.; Dupont, E.; Semkova, V. Nuclear Data Sheets, Vol. 120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.065	journal	June 2014
Secondary Antiprotons and Propagation of Cosmic Rays in the Galaxy and Heliosphere Moskalenko, Igor V.; Strong, Andrew W.; Ormes, Jonathan F. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 565, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/324402	journal	January 2002
Constraining Galactic cosmic-ray parameters with Z ≤ 2 nuclei Coste, B.; Derome, L.; Maurin, D. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 539 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117927	journal	February 2012
Systematic uncertainties on the cosmic-ray transport parameters: Is it possible to reconcile B/C data with Maurin, D.; Putze, A.; Derome, L. Astronomy and Astrophysics, Vol. 516 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014011	journal	June 2010
Theoretical uncertainties in extracting cosmic-ray diffusion parameters: the boron-to-carbon ratio Genolini, Y.; Putze, A.; Salati, P. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 580 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526344	journal	July 2015
Solar and nuclear physics uncertainties in cosmic-ray propagation Tomassetti, Nicola Physical Review D, Vol. 96, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.103005	journal	November 2017
Binary collision rates of relativistic thermal plasmas. II - Spectra Dermer, C. D. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 307 https://doi.org/10.1086/164391	journal	August 1986
Parametrizations of inclusive cross sections for pion production in proton-proton collisions Blattnig, Steve R.; Swaminathan, Sudha R.; Kruger, Adam T. Physical Review D, Vol. 62, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.094030	journal	October 2000
Diffractive Interaction and Scaling Violation in pp →π 0 Interaction and GeV Excess in Galactic Diffuse Gamma‐Ray Spectrum of EGRET Kamae, Tuneyoshi; Abe, Toshinori; Koi, Tatsumi The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 620, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/426935	journal	February 2005
Parameterization of \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage[OT2,OT1]{fontenc} \newcommand\cyr{ \renewcommand\rmdefault{wncyr} \renewcommand\sfdefault{wncyss} \renewcommand\encodingdefault{OT2} \normalfont \selectfont} \DeclareTextFontCommand{\textcyr}{\cyr} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document} \landscape $\gamma ,\, e^{\pm }$ \end{document} , and Neutrino Spectra Produced by p‐p Interaction in Astronomical Environments Kamae, Tuneyoshi; Karlsson, Niklas; Mizuno, Tsunefumi The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 647, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/505189	journal	August 2006
Diffractive interactions of hadrons at high energies Goulianos, K. Physics Reports, Vol. 101, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(83)90010-8	journal	December 1983
Factorization and scaling in hadronic diffraction Goulianos, K.; Montanha, J. Physical Review D, Vol. 59, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.114017	journal	May 1999
Parameterized total cross sections for pion production in nuclear collisions Norbury, John W.; Townsend, Lawrence W. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Vol. 254, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2006.11.054	journal	January 2007
Gamma-rays produced in cosmic-ray interactions and the TeV-band spectrum of RX J1713.7-3946 Huang, C. -Y.; Park, S. -E.; Pohl, M. Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 27, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2007.01.002	journal	June 2007
On the Annihilation of Electrons and Protons Dirac, P. A. M. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 26, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100016091	journal	July 1930
Parametrization of $\bar{p}$ invariant cross section in $p - p$ collisions using a new scaling variable Tan, L. C.; Ng, L. K. Physical Review D, Vol. 26, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.1179	journal	September 1982
Parametrization of the antiproton inclusive production cross section on nuclei Duperray, R. P.; Huang, C. -Y.; Protasov, K. V. Physical Review D, Vol. 68, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.094017	journal	November 2003
New evaluation of the antiproton production cross section for cosmic ray studies di Mauro, Mattia; Donato, Fiorenza; Goudelis, Andreas Physical Review D, Vol. 90, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.085017	journal	October 2014
The cosmic ray antiproton background for AMS-02 Kappl, Rolf; Winkler, Martin Wolfgang Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 2014, Issue 09 https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/051	journal	September 2014
Baryon Yields, Isospin Effects and Strangeness Production in Elementary Hadronic Interactions Fischer, Hans Gerhard; Na49, Collaboration Acta Physica Hungarica A) Heavy Ion Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 2-4 https://doi.org/10.1556/APH.17.2003.2-4.20	journal	April 2003
Production of Mesons and Baryons at High Rapidity and High $p_{T}$ in Proton-Proton Collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 200 GeV$ Arsene, I.; Bearden, I. G.; Beavis, D. Physical Review Letters, Vol. 98, Issue 25 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.252001	journal	June 2007
EPOS LHC: Test of collective hadronization with data measured at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Pierog, T.; Karpenko, Iu.; Katzy, J. M. Physical Review C, Vol. 92, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.034906	journal	September 2015
Monte Carlo treatment of hadronic interactions in enhanced Pomeron scheme: QGSJET-II model Ostapchenko, S. Physical Review D, Vol. 83, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.014018	journal	January 2011
Bayesian analysis of spatial-dependent cosmic-ray propagation: Astrophysical background of antiprotons and positrons Feng, Jie; Tomassetti, Nicola; Oliva, Alberto Physical Review D, Vol. 94, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.123007	journal	December 2016
Prescriptions on antiproton cross section data for precise theoretical antiproton flux predictions Donato, Fiorenza; Korsmeier, Michael; Di Mauro, Mattia Physical Review D, Vol. 96, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.043007	journal	August 2017
New Calculation of Antiproton Production by Cosmic ray Protons and Nuclei Kachelriess, Michael; Moskalenko, Igor V.; Ostapchenko, Sergey S. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 803, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/54	journal	April 2015
Production cross sections of cosmic antiprotons in the light of new data from the NA61 and LHCb experiments Korsmeier, Michael; Donato, Fiorenza; Di Mauro, Mattia Physical Review D, Vol. 97, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.103019	journal	May 2018
Antiprotons and Cosmic‐Ray Propagation in the Galaxy Shibata, T.; Futo, Y.; Sekiguchi, S. The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 678, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/529427	journal	May 2008
Inelastic cross section for antihelium on nuclei: an empirical formula for use in the experiments to search for cosmic antimatter Moiseev, A. A.; Ormes, J. F. Astroparticle Physics, Vol. 6, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-6505(96)00071-0	journal	April 1997
Cosmic Antiprotons as a Probe for Supersymmetric Dark Matter? Bergstrom, Lars; Edsjo, Joakim; Ullio, Piero The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 526, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/307975	journal	November 1999
The FLUKA Code: Developments and Challenges for High Energy and Medical Applications Böhlen, T. T.; Cerutti, F.; Chin, M. P. W. Nuclear Data Sheets, Vol. 120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.07.049	journal	June 2014
Geant4—a simulation toolkit Agostinelli, S.; Allison, J.; Amako, K. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Vol. 506, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8	journal	July 2003
A database of charged cosmic rays Maurin, D.; Melot, F.; Taillet, R. Astronomy & Astrophysics, Vol. 569 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321344	journal	September 2014
AMS-02 antiprotons, at last! Secondary astrophysical component and immediate implications for Dark Matter Giesen, Gaëlle; Boudaud, Mathieu; Génolini, Yoann RWTH Aachen University https://doi.org/10.18154/rwth-2016-07480	text	January 2015
Gamma-Rays Produced in Cosmic-Ray Interactions and the TeV-band Spectrum of RX J1713.7-3946 Huang, C. -Y.; Park, S. -E.; Pohl, M. THE FIRST GLAST SYMPOSIUM, AIP Conference Proceedings https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2757294	conference	January 2007
The nuclear symmetry energy Dieperink, A. E. L.; Neck, D. van Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 20 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/20/1/027	journal	January 2005
Production cross sections of cosmic antiprotons in the light of new data from the NA61 and LHCb experiments Donato, Fiorenza; Korsmeier, Michael; DiMauro, Mattia Proceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.358.0061	conference	July 2019
Cosmic Ray Energetics And Mass for the International Space Station (ISS-CREAM) Seo, Eun-Suk; Amare, Y.; Angelaszek, D. Proceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) https://doi.org/10.22323/1.358.0137	conference	July 2019
Systematic uncertainties on the cosmic-ray transport parameters: Is it possible to reconcile B/C data with delta = 1/3 or delta = 1/2? Maurin, D.; Putze, A.; Derome, L. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1001.0553	text	January 2010
The Cosmic Ray Antiproton Background for AMS-02 Kappl, Rolf; Winkler, Martin Wolfgang arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1408.0299	text	January 2014
Spiral Arms as Cosmic Ray Source Distributions Werner, M.; Kissmann, R.; Strong, A. W. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1410.5266	text	January 2014
New calculation of antiproton production by cosmic ray protons and nuclei Kachelriess, Michael; Moskalenko, Igor V.; Ostapchenko, Sergey S. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1502.04158	text	January 2015
Secondary antiprotons as a Galactic Dark Matter probe Evoli, Carmelo; Gaggero, Daniele; Grasso, Dario arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1504.05175	text	January 2015
Non-parametric determination of H and He interstellar fluxes from cosmic-ray data Ghelfi, A.; Barao, F.; Derome, L. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1511.08650	text	January 2015
Radial distribution of the diffuse gamma-ray emissivity in the galactic disk Yang, Rui-zhi; Aharonian, Felix; Evoli, Carmelo arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1602.04710	text	January 2016
Cosmic Ray Antiprotons at High Energies Winkler, Martin Wolfgang arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1701.04866	text	January 2017
Prescriptions on antiproton cross section data for precise theoretical antiproton flux predictions Donato, Fiorenza; Korsmeier, Michael; Di Mauro, Mattia arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1704.03663	text	January 2017
The DArk Matter Particle Explorer mission Chang, J.; Ambrosi, G.; An, Q. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1706.08453	text	January 2017
Secondary antiprotons and propagation of cosmic rays in the Galaxy and heliosphere Moskalenko, I. V.; Strong, A. W.; Ormes, J. F. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0106567	text	January 2001
Challenging cosmic ray propagation with antiprotons. Evidence for a "fresh" nuclei component? Moskalenko, I. V.; Strong, A. W.; Mashnik, S. G. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0210480	text	January 2002
Parameterization of the antiproton inclusive production cross section on nuclei Duperray, R. P.; Huang, C. -Y.; Protasov, K. V. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0305274	text	January 2003
Production and propagation of cosmic-ray positrons and electrons Moskalenko, I. V.; Strong, A. W. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9710124	text	January 1997
Propagation of cosmic-ray nucleons in the Galaxy Strong, A. W.; Moskalenko, I. V. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9807150	text	January 1998
Cosmic antiprotons as a probe for supersymmetric dark matter? Bergstrom, L.; Edsjo, J.; Ullio, P. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9902012	text	January 1999
Solar System Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements Lodders, Katharina The Astrophysical Journal, Vol. 591, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1086/375492	journal	July 2003
Parametrization of gamma-ray production cross-sections for pp interactions in a broad proton energy range from the kinematic threshold to PeV energies Kafexhiu, Ervin; Aharonian, Felix; Taylor, Andrew M. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1406.7369	text	January 2014
Current status and desired accuracy of the isotopic production cross sections relevant to astrophysics of cosmic rays I. Li, Be, B, C, N Genolini, Yoann; Maurin, David; Moskalenko, Igor V. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1803.04686	text	January 2018
Galactic Cosmic Ray Nuclei as a Tool for Astroparticle Physics Maurin, David; Taillet, Richard; Donato, Fiorenza arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0212111	preprint	January 2002
The Structure of the Pomeron Goulianos, Konstantin arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.hep-ph/9505310	preprint	January 1995
Analysis of the GSI A+p and A+A Spallation, Fission, and Fragmentation Measurements with the LANL CEM2k and LAQGSM codes Mashnik, S. G.; Gudima, K. K.; Prael, R. E. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.nucl-th/0404018	preprint	January 2004

Cited By (7)

Positron Scattering: Total Elastic and Grand Total Cross Sections for Molecules of Astrophysical Importance Sinha, Nidhi; Patel, Durgesini; Antony, Bobby ChemistrySelect, Vol. 4, Issue 15 https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201803338	journal	April 2019
Effects of re-acceleration and source grammage on secondary cosmic rays spectra Bresci, V.; Amato, E.; Blasi, P. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 488, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1806	journal	July 2019
AMS-02 beryllium data and its implication for cosmic ray transport Evoli, Carmelo; Morlino, Giovanni; Blasi, Pasquale Physical Review D, Vol. 101, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.101.023013	journal	January 2020
Scrutinizing the evidence for dark matter in cosmic-ray antiprotons Cuoco, Alessandro; Heisig, Jan; Klamt, Lukas Physical Review D, Vol. 99, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.99.103014	journal	May 2019
Galactic cosmic rays after the AMS-02 observations Evoli, Carmelo; Aloisio, Roberto; Blasi, Pasquale Physical Review D, Vol. 99, Issue 10 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.99.103023	journal	May 2019
Scrutinizing the evidence for dark matter in cosmic-ray antiprotons Cuoco, Alessandro; Heisig, Jan; Klamt, Lukas arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1903.01472	text	January 2019
Impact of Cosmic-Ray Physics on Dark Matter Indirect Searches Gaggero, Daniele; Valli, Mauro Advances in High Energy Physics, Vol. 2018 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3010514	journal	December 2018

Linked Research (6)

Similar Records

Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: I. numerical solver and astrophysical ingredients

Journal Article · Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · OSTI ID:1461832

Evoli, Carmelo; Gaggero, Daniele; Vittino, Andrea; +5 more

Quantifying the Uncertainty in Deterministic Phonon Transport Calculations of Thermal Conductivity using Polynomial Chaos Expansions

Journal Article · Fri Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2016 · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society · OSTI ID:1461832

Harter, Jackson R.; Palmer, Todd S.; Greaney, P. Alex

The curious case of high-energy deuterons in galactic cosmic rays

Journal Article · Wed Feb 01 00:00:00 EST 2017 · Astrophysical Journal Letters · OSTI ID:1461832

Tomassetti, Nicola; Feng, Jie

Related Subjects

79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
galactic cosmic rays
cross sections
numerical methods

Fragmentation cross-sections for cosmic ray nuclei in the interstellar medium Evoli, Carmelo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3529612 The current record documents this dataset	dataset	January 2019
Fragmentation cross-sections for cosmic ray nuclei in the interstellar medium Evoli, Carmelo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3529613 The current record documents this dataset	dataset	January 2019
Fragmentation cross-sections for cosmic ray nuclei in the interstellar medium Evoli, Carmelo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3529761 The current record documents this dataset	dataset	January 2019
Fragmentation cross-sections for cosmic ray nuclei in the interstellar medium Evoli, Carmelo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3911015 The current record documents this dataset	dataset	January 2019
Fragmentation cross-sections for cosmic ray nuclei in the interstellar medium Evoli, Carmelo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3529761 The current record is a supplement to this dataset	dataset	January 2019
Fragmentation cross-sections for cosmic ray nuclei in the interstellar medium Evoli, Carmelo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3529613 The current record is a supplement to this dataset	dataset	January 2019