skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Application of the Aquifer Impact Model to support decisions at a CO2 sequestration site

Journal Article · · Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1730· OSTI ID:1458630
ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [3];  [4];  [2];  [4];  [2]; ORCiD logo [5];  [6];  [2]
  1. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
  2. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States). Illinois State Geological Survey (ISGS)
  3. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
  4. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
  5. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
  6. University of Illinois, Illinois State Geological Survey Champaign IL USA

© 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP) has developed a suite of tools to assess and manage risk at CO2 sequestration sites. The NRAP tool suite includes the Aquifer Impact Model (AIM), which evaluates the potential for groundwater impacts from leaks of CO2 and brine through abandoned wellbores. There are two aquifer reduced-order models (ROMs) included with the AIM tool, a confined alluvium aquifer, and an unconfined carbonate aquifer. The models accept aquifer parameters as a range of variable inputs so they may have broad applicability. The generic aquifer models may be used at the early stages of site selection, when site-specific data is not available. Guidelines have been developed for determining when the generic ROMs might be applicable to a new site. This paper considers the application of the AIM to predicting the impact of CO2 or brine leakage were it to occur at the Illinois Basin Decatur Project (IBDP). Results of the model sensitivity analysis can help guide characterization efforts; the hydraulic parameters and leakage source term magnitude are more sensitive than clay fraction or cation exchange capacity. Sand permeability was the only hydraulic parameter measured at the IBDP site. More information on the other hydraulic parameters could reduce uncertainty in risk estimates. Some non-adjustable parameters are significantly different for the ROM than for the observations at the IBDP site. The generic ROMs could be made more useful to a wider range of sites if the initial conditions and no-impact threshold values were adjustable parameters. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), Pittsburgh, PA, Morgantown, WV (United States); Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA); USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE); USDOE Office of Science (SC)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC52-07NA27344; FC26‐05NT42588; AC05-76RL01830; AC52-06NA25396; AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
1458630
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1396417; OSTI ID: 1461397; OSTI ID: 1563942
Report Number(s):
LLNL-JRNL-738821; PNNL‐SA-‐124662; PNNL-17-60716; LA-UR-17-28174; 890919
Journal Information:
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Vol. 7, Issue 6; ISSN 2152-3878
Publisher:
Society of Chemical Industry, WileyCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 1 work
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (16)

Effective detection of CO2 leakage: a comparison of groundwater sampling and pressure monitoring journal January 2014
Geochemical Impacts of Carbon Dioxide, Brine, Trace Metal and Organic Leakage into an Unconfined, Oxidizing Limestone Aquifer journal January 2014
Applicability of aquifer impact models to support decisions at CO2 sequestration sites journal September 2016
Derivation of groundwater threshold values for analysis of impacts predicted at potential carbon sequestration sites journal June 2016
An overview of the Illinois Basin - Decatur Project: An overview of the Illinois Basin - Decatur Project journal September 2014
Hydrogeology and geochemistry of the Ogallala aquifer, Southern High Plains journal June 1987
Model for CO 2 Leakage Including Multiple Geological Layers and Multiple Leaky Wells journal February 2009
Mineralogical Alterations During Laboratory-scale Carbon Sequestration Experiments for the Illinois Basin journal January 2013
Modeling the impact of carbon dioxide leakage into an unconfined, oxidizing carbonate aquifer journal January 2016
Key factors for determining groundwater impacts due to leakage from geologic carbon sequestration reservoirs journal October 2014
A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output journal February 1999
Impacts of Geochemical Reactions on Geologic Carbon Sequestration journal August 2012
Geochemical Implications of Gas Leakage associated with Geologic CO 2 Storage—A Qualitative Review journal August 2012
A response surface model to predict CO2 and brine leakage along cemented wellbores journal February 2015
Shallow groundwater system monitoring on controlled CO2 release sites: a review on field experimental methods and efforts for CO2 leakage detection journal January 2016
Conceptualization and Simulation of the Edwards Aquifer, San Antonio Region, Texas
  • Lindgren, R. J.; Dutton, A. R.; Hovorka, S. D.
  • 10th Multidisciplinary Conference on Sinkholes and the Engineering and Environmental Impacts of Karst https://doi.org/10.1061/40796(177)14
conference April 2012

Cited By (1)

Field‐scale well leakage risk assessment using reduced‐order models journal May 2019