Solution to the γγ*→ηc puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality

Wang, Sheng-Quan; Wu, Xing-Gang; Sang, Wen-Long; Brodsky, Stanley J.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034

Solution to the $γ γ^{*} \to η_{c}$ puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality

Journal Article · 01 May 2018 · Physical Review D

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094034· OSTI ID:1444025

Wang, Sheng-Quan; Wu, Xing-Gang; Sang, Wen-Long; Brodsky, Stanley J.

View Journal Article

Research Organization:: SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Science (SC)

DOE Contract Number:: AC02-76SF00515

OSTI ID:: 1444025

Report Number(s):: SLAC-PUB-17247; PRVDAQ

Journal Information:: Physical Review D, Vol. 97, Issue 9; ISSN 2470-0010

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

References (23)

$ \mathcal{O}\left( {{\alpha_s}{v^2}} \right) $ correction to pseudoscalar quarkonium decay to two photons Jia, Yu; Yang, Xiu-Ting; Sang, Wen-Long Journal of High Energy Physics, Vol. 2011, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2011)097	journal	June 2011
RunDec: a Mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses Chetyrkin, K. G.; Kühn, J. H.; Steinhauser, M. Computer Physics Communications, Vol. 133, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(00)00155-7	journal	December 2000
Renormalons Beneke, M. Physics Reports, Vol. 317, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00130-6	journal	August 1999
Self-consistency requirements of the renormalization group for setting the renormalization scale Brodsky, Stanley J.; Wu, Xing-Gang Physical Review D, Vol. 86, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.054018	journal	September 2012
Can Nonrelativistic QCD Explain the γ γ * → η c Transition Form Factor Data? Feng, Feng; Jia, Yu; Sang, Wen-Long Physical Review Letters, Vol. 115, Issue 22 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.222001	journal	November 2015
Partonic structure of neutral pseudoscalars via two photon transition form factors Raya, Khépani; Ding, Minghui; Bashir, Adnan Physical Review D, Vol. 95, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.074014	journal	April 2017
Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium Bodwin, Geoffrey T.; Braaten, Eric; Lepage, G. Peter Physical Review D, Vol. 51, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.1125	journal	February 1995
Importance of proper renormalization scale-setting for QCD testing at colliders Wu, Xing-Gang; Wang, Sheng-Quan; Brodsky, Stanley J. Frontiers of Physics, Vol. 11, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-015-0518-5	journal	December 2015
Light-front holographic QCD and emerging confinement Brodsky, Stanley J.; de Téramond, Guy F.; Dosch, Hans Günter Physics Reports, Vol. 584 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.05.001	journal	July 2015
Higher order corrections to the cross section of e + e − → quarkonium + γ Sang, Wen-Long; Chen, Yu-Qi Physical Review D, Vol. 81, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.034028	journal	February 2010
The renormalization scale-setting problem in QCD Wu, Xing-Gang; Brodsky, Stanley J.; Mojaza, Matin Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Vol. 72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.06.001	journal	September 2013
Scale setting using the extended renormalization group and the principle of maximum conformality: The QCD coupling constant at four loops Brodsky, Stanley J.; Wu, Xing-Gang Physical Review D, Vol. 85, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.034038	journal	February 2012
Renormalization group invariance and optimal QCD renormalization scale-setting: a key issues review Wu, Xing-Gang; Ma, Yang; Wang, Sheng-Quan Reports on Progress in Physics, Vol. 78, Issue 12 https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/12/126201	journal	October 2015
Erratum: Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium [Phys. Rev. D 51 , 1125 (1995)] Bodwin, Geoffrey T.; Braaten, Eric; Lepage, G. Peter Physical Review D, Vol. 55, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.5853	journal	May 1997
Measurement of the γ γ * → η c transition form factor Lees, J. P.; Poireau, V.; Prencipe, E. Physical Review D, Vol. 81, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.81.052010	journal	March 2010
On the elimination of scale ambiguities in perturbative quantum chromodynamics Brodsky, Stanley J.; Lepage, G. Peter; Mackenzie, Paul B. Physical Review D, Vol. 28, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.228	journal	July 1983
Novel all-orders single-scale approach to QCD renormalization scale-setting Shen, Jian-Ming; Wu, Xing-Gang; Du, Bo-Lun Physical Review D, Vol. 95, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.094006	journal	May 2017
Eliminating the Renormalization Scale Ambiguity for Top-Pair Production Using the Principle of Maximum Conformality Brodsky, Stanley J.; Wu, Xing-Gang Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.042002	journal	July 2012
Systematic All-Orders Method to Eliminate Renormalization-Scale and Scheme Ambiguities in Perturbative QCD Mojaza, Matin; Brodsky, Stanley J.; Wu, Xing-Gang Physical Review Letters, Vol. 110, Issue 19 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.192001	journal	May 2013
Systematic scale-setting to all orders: The principle of maximum conformality and commensurate scale relations Brodsky, Stanley J.; Mojaza, Matin; Wu, Xing-Gang Physical Review D, Vol. 89, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.014027	journal	January 2014
O ( α s v 2 ) corrections to hadronic and electromagnetic decays of S 0 1 heavy quarkonium Guo, Huai-Ke; Ma, Yan-Qing; Chao, Kuang-Ta Physical Review D, Vol. 83, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.83.114038	journal	June 2011
Quantum Electrodynamics at Small Distances Gell-Mann, M.; Low, F. E. Physical Review, Vol. 95, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.1300	journal	September 1954
Aspects of SU(Nc) gauge theories in the limit of small number of colors Brodsky, Stanley J.; Huet, Patrick Physics Letters B, Vol. 417, Issue 1-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01209-4	journal	January 1998

Cited By (5)

γ * γ * → η c ( 1 S , 2 S ) transition form factors for spacelike photons Babiarz, Izabela; Goncalves, Victor P.; Pasechnik, Roman Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.100.054018	journal	September 2019
γ * γ → η , η ′ transition form factors Ding, Minghui; Raya, Khépani; Bashir, Adnan Physical Review D, Vol. 99, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.99.014014	journal	January 2019
Extending the predictive power of perturbative QCD Du, Bo-Lun; Wu, Xing-Gang; Shen, Jian-Ming The European Physical Journal C, Vol. 79, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6704-9	journal	February 2019
Transition form factors: γ * + p → Δ ( 1232 ) , Δ ( 1600 ) Lu, Y.; Chen, C.; Cui, Z. -F. Physical Review D, Vol. 100, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.100.034001	journal	August 2019
Extending the Predictive Power of Perturbative QCD Du, Bo-Lun; Wu, Xing-Gang; Shen, Jian-Ming arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1807.11144	text	January 2018

Similar Records

Solution to the

γ γ^{*} \to η_{c}

puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality

Journal Article · 2018 · Physical Review D · OSTI ID:1439733

Wang, Sheng -Quan; Wu, Xing -Gang; Sang, Wen -Long; +1 more

Solution to the γ γ * → η c puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality

Citation Formats

References (23)

Cited By (5)

Similar Records

Related Subjects

Solution to the $γ γ^{*} \to η_{c}$ puzzle using the principle of maximum conformality