Projects without a purpose: Why a top down strategy to resilience matters
Energy resilience is a key focus of the current administration and Department of Defense (DoD) leaders, and is in the title of every energy conference session. Most case studies and success stories focus on resilience projects hardening systems or microgriding critical infrastructure. Some case studies focus on unique financing approaches to bring private sector innovation and increased investment to military installations. Many times, what initially look like innovative resilience projects, end as isolated systems or stranded infrastructure. This article will explore how the DoD can make greater strides advancing resilience objectives and ultimately developing projects that support installation mission readiness by first focusing on top down strategies. The Army established energy and water security/resilience requirements, developed a comprehensive measurement framework, is evolving integrated planning approaches in collaboration with local communities, and is supporting project development activities across third-party and appropriated programs. The Army’s multi-year strategic energy and water security planning activities can provide helpful guidance to both the lifecycle of programs or individual projects, and ensure resilience projects both have and achieve a purpose.
- Research Organization:
- Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-76RL01830
- OSTI ID:
- 1438995
- Report Number(s):
- PNNL-SA-134184; 453040075
- Journal Information:
- The Military Engineer, 10(714):50-52, Journal Name: The Military Engineer, 10(714):50-52
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Energy Master Planning for Resilient Public Communities—Best Practices from U.S. Military Installations
Quantitative approaches for including equity in risk and resilience infrastructure planning analyses