What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Title: What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:: Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; Young, Kevin; Sarovar, Mohan; Blume-Kohout, Robin J

Publication Date:: 2017-03-01

Research Org.:: Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: IARPA

OSTI Identifier:: 1427336

Report Number(s):: SAND2017-2703C
Journal ID: ISSN 0031-9007; 651681

DOE Contract Number:: AC04-94AL85000

Resource Type:: Conference

Resource Relation:: Journal Volume: 119; Journal Issue: 13; Conference: Proposed for presentation at the APS March Meeting held March 13-17, 2017 in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States.

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Formats


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, and Blume-Kohout, Robin J. What randomized benchmarking actually measures..  United States: N. p., 2017. 
        Web.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.

Copy to clipboard


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, & Blume-Kohout, Robin J. What randomized benchmarking actually measures..  United States.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.

Copy to clipboard


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, and Blume-Kohout, Robin J. Wed .  
        "What randomized benchmarking actually measures.".  United States.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1427336.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1427336,

  title        = {What randomized benchmarking actually measures.},

  author       = {Proctor, Timothy James and Rudinger, Kenneth Michael and Young, Kevin and Sarovar, Mohan and Blume-Kohout, Robin J},

  abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502},

  journal      = {},

  issn         = {0031-9007},

  number       = 13,

  volume       = 119,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {2017},

  month        = {3}

}

Copy to clipboard

Conference:

View Conference (1.90 MB)

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Other availability

Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Works referenced in this record:

Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices
journal, June 1975

Choi, Man-Duen
Linear Algebra and its Applications, Vol. 10, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(75)90075-0

An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity
journal, October 2014

Veldhorst, M.; Hwang, J. C. C.; Yang, C. H.
Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 9, Issue 12
DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2014.216

Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking
journal, June 2014

Kelly, J.; Barends, R.; Campbell, B.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 112, Issue 24
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240504

Choi matrices, norms and entanglement associated with positive maps on matrix algebras
journal, January 2012

Skowronek, Łukasz; Størmer, Erling
Journal of Functional Analysis, Vol. 262, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2011.09.022

Randomized Benchmarking of Single-Qubit Gates in a 2D Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits
journal, March 2015

Xia, T.; Lichtman, M.; Maller, K.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 114, Issue 10
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.100503

Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit
journal, January 2016

Chen, Zijun; Kelly, Julian; Quintana, Chris
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 116, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020501

Robust Characterization of Loss Rates
journal, August 2015

Wallman, Joel J.; Barnhill, Marie; Emerson, Joseph
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 115, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.060501

Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators
journal, September 2005

Emerson, Joseph; Alicki, Robert; Życzkowski, Karol
Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, Vol. 7, Issue 10
DOI: 10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/021

Self-consistent quantum process tomography
journal, June 2013

Merkel, Seth T.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Smolin, John A.
Physical Review A, Vol. 87, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.062119

Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
journal, January 2008

Knill, E.; Leibfried, D.; Reichle, R.
Physical Review A, Vol. 77, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.012307

Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits
journal, April 2015

Córcoles, A. D.; Magesan, Easwar; Srinivasan, Srikanth J.
Nature Communications, Vol. 6, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7979

Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking
journal, January 2016

Sheldon, Sarah; Bishop, Lev S.; Magesan, Easwar
Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012301

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
journal, April 2014

Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Megrant, A.
Nature, Vol. 508, Issue 7497
DOI: 10.1038/nature13171

Quantifying the quantum gate fidelity of single-atom spin qubits in silicon by randomized benchmarking
journal, March 2015

Muhonen, J. T.; Laucht, A.; Simmons, S.
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, Vol. 27, Issue 15
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/15/154205

Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation
journal, July 2009

Dankert, Christoph; Cleve, Richard; Emerson, Joseph
Physical Review A, Vol. 80, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.012304

Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric
journal, June 2014

Chow, Jerry M.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Magesan, Easwar
Nature Communications, Vol. 5, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5015

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
journal, May 2011

Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, J. M.; Emerson, Joseph
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 106, Issue 18
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180504

Electrically controlling single-spin qubits in a continuous microwave field
journal, April 2015

Laucht, Arne; Muhonen, Juha T.; Mohiyaddin, Fahd A.
Science Advances, Vol. 1, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500022

Accelerated randomized benchmarking
journal, January 2015

Granade, Christopher; Ferrie, Christopher; Cory, D. G.
New Journal of Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/013042

Effect of noise correlations on randomized benchmarking
journal, February 2016

Ball, Harrison; Stace, Thomas M.; Flammia, Steven T.
Physical Review A, Vol. 93, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.022303

Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols
journal, June 2014

Epstein, Jeffrey M.; Cross, Andrew W.; Magesan, Easwar
Physical Review A, Vol. 89, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.062321

Estimating the coherence of noise
journal, November 2015

Wallman, Joel; Granade, Chris; Harper, Robin
New Journal of Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 11
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113020

Rolling quantum dice with a superconducting qubit
journal, September 2014

Barends, R.; Kelly, J.; Veitia, A.
Physical Review A, Vol. 90, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.030303

Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors
journal, October 2015

Chasseur, T.; Wilhelm, F. K.
Physical Review A, Vol. 92, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.042333

Nonexponential fidelity decay in randomized benchmarking with low-frequency noise
journal, August 2015

Fogarty, M. A.; Veldhorst, M.; Harper, R.
Physical Review A, Vol. 92, Issue 2
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.022326

Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates
journal, April 2016

Cross, Andrew W.; Magesan, Easwar; Bishop, Lev S.
npj Quantum Information, Vol. 2, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/npjqi.2016.12

Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking
journal, August 2012

Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, Jay M.; Johnson, B. R.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 8
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.080505

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography
journal, February 2017

Blume-Kohout, Robin; Gamble, John King; Nielsen, Erik
Nature Communications, Vol. 8, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14485

Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes
journal, September 2007

Emerson, J.; Silva, M.; Moussa, O.
Science, Vol. 317, Issue 5846
DOI: 10.1126/science.1145699

Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking
journal, April 2012

Magesan, Easwar; Gambetta, Jay M.; Emerson, Joseph
Physical Review A, Vol. 85, Issue 4
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.042311

Robust Extraction of Tomographic Information via Randomized Benchmarking
journal, March 2014

Kimmel, Shelby; da Silva, Marcus P.; Ryan, Colm A.
Physical Review X, Vol. 4, Issue 1
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011050

Randomized benchmarking in measurement-based quantum computing
journal, September 2016

Alexander, Rafael N.; Turner, Peter S.; Bartlett, Stephen D.
Physical Review A, Vol. 94, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.032303

Characterizing universal gate sets via dihedral benchmarking
journal, December 2015

Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud; Wallman, Joel J.; Emerson, Joseph
Physical Review A, Vol. 92, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.060302

Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking
journal, December 2012

Gambetta, Jay M.; Córcoles, A. D.; Merkel, S. T.
Physical Review Letters, Vol. 109, Issue 24
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.240504

Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking
journal, March 2013

Córcoles, A. D.; Gambetta, Jay M.; Chow, Jerry M.
Physical Review A, Vol. 87, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.030301

Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes
journal, June 2005

Gilchrist, Alexei; Langford, Nathan K.; Nielsen, Michael A.
Physical Review A, Vol. 71, Issue 6
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062310

Quantum operation time reversal
journal, March 2008

Crooks, Gavin E.
Physical Review A, Vol. 77, Issue 3
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.034101

Demonstration of robust quantum gate tomography via randomized benchmarking
journal, November 2015

Johnson, Blake R.; Silva, Marcus P. da; Ryan, Colm A.
New Journal of Physics, Vol. 17, Issue 11
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/17/11/113019

Randomized benchmarking with confidence
journal, October 2014

Wallman, Joel J.; Flammia, Steven T.
New Journal of Physics, Vol. 16, Issue 10
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/103032

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices

Journal Article Proctor, Timothy J. ; Carignan-Dugas, Arnaud ; Rudinger, Kenneth ; ... - Physical Review Letters

Benchmarking methods that can be adapted to multiqubit systems are essential for assessing the overall or “holistic” performance of nascent quantum processors. The current industry standard is Clifford randomized benchmarking (RB), which measures a single error rate that quantifies overall performance. But, scaling Clifford RB to many qubits is surprisingly hard. It has only been performed on one, two, and three qubits as of this writing. This reflects a fundamental inefficiency in Clifford RB: the n-qubit Clifford gates at its core have to be compiled into large circuits over the one- and two-qubit gates native to a device. As nmore »« less
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.030503
What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures

Journal Article Proctor, Timothy ; Rudinger, Kenneth ; Young, Kevin ; ... - Physical Review Letters

Randomized benchmarking (RB) is widely used to measure an error rate of a set of quantum gates, by performing random circuits that would do nothing if the gates were perfect. In the limit of no finite-sampling error, the exponential decay rate of the observable survival probabilities, versus circuit length, yields a single error metric r. For Clifford gates with arbitrary small errors described by process matrices, r was believed to reliably correspond to the mean, over all Clifford gates, of the average gate infidelity between the imperfect gates and their ideal counterparts. We show that this quantity is not amore »« less
Cited by 17
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.130502

Full Text Available
BioCompoundML: A General Biofuel Property Screening Tool for Biological Molecules Using Random Forest Classifiers

Journal Article Whitmore, Leanne S. ; Davis, Ryan W. ; McCormick, Robert L. ; ... - Energy and Fuels

Screening a large number of biologically derived molecules for potential fuel compounds without recourse to experimental testing is important in identifying understudied yet valuable molecules. Experimental testing, although a valuable standard for measuring fuel properties, has several major limitations, including the requirement of testably high quantities, considerable expense, and a large amount of time. This paper discusses the development of a general-purpose fuel property tool, using machine learning, whose outcome is to screen molecules for desirable fuel properties. BioCompoundML adopts a general methodology, requiring as input only a list of training compounds (with identifiers and measured values) and a listmore »« less
Cited by 1
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01952
BioCompoundML: A General Biofuel Property Screening Tool for Biological Molecules Using Random Forest Classifiers

Journal Article Whitmore, Leanne S. ; Davis, Ryan W. ; McCormick, Robert L. ; ... - Energy and Fuels

Screening a large number of biologically derived molecules for potential fuel compounds without recourse to experimental testing is important in identifying understudied yet valuable molecules. Experimental testing, although a valuable standard for measuring fuel properties, has several major limitations, including the requirement of testably high quantities, considerable expense, and a large amount of time. This paper discusses the development of a general-purpose fuel property tool, using machine learning, whose outcome is to screen molecules for desirable fuel properties. BioCompoundML adopts a general methodology, requiring as input only a list of training compounds (with identifiers and measured values) and a listmore »« less
Cited by 1
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01952

Full Text Available
BioCompoundML: A General Biofuel Property Screening Tool for Biological Molecules Using Random Forest Classifiers

Journal Article Whitmore, Leanne S. ; Davis, Ryan W. ; McCormick, Robert L. ; ... - Energy and Fuels

Screening a large number of biologically derived molecules for potential fuel compounds without recourse to experimental testing is important in identifying understudied yet valuable molecules. Experimental testing, although a valuable standard for measuring fuel properties, has several major limitations, including the requirement of testably high quantities, considerable expense, and a large amount of time. This paper discusses the development of a general-purpose fuel property tool, using machine learning, whose outcome is to screen molecules for desirable fuel properties. BioCompoundML adopts a general methodology, requiring as input only a list of training compounds (with identifiers and measured values) and a listmore »« less
Cited by 1
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b01952

Full Text Available

Similar Records

Title: What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Abstract

Citation Formats

Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices journal, June 1975

An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity journal, October 2014

Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking journal, June 2014

Choi matrices, norms and entanglement associated with positive maps on matrix algebras journal, January 2012

Randomized Benchmarking of Single-Qubit Gates in a 2D Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits journal, March 2015

Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit journal, January 2016

Robust Characterization of Loss Rates journal, August 2015

Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators journal, September 2005

Self-consistent quantum process tomography journal, June 2013

Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates journal, January 2008

Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits journal, April 2015

Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking journal, January 2016

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance journal, April 2014

Quantifying the quantum gate fidelity of single-atom spin qubits in silicon by randomized benchmarking journal, March 2015

Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation journal, July 2009

Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric journal, June 2014

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes journal, May 2011

Electrically controlling single-spin qubits in a continuous microwave field journal, April 2015

Accelerated randomized benchmarking journal, January 2015

Effect of noise correlations on randomized benchmarking journal, February 2016

Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols journal, June 2014

Estimating the coherence of noise journal, November 2015

Rolling quantum dice with a superconducting qubit journal, September 2014

Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors journal, October 2015

Nonexponential fidelity decay in randomized benchmarking with low-frequency noise journal, August 2015

Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates journal, April 2016

Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking journal, August 2012

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography journal, February 2017

Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes journal, September 2007

Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking journal, April 2012

Robust Extraction of Tomographic Information via Randomized Benchmarking journal, March 2014

Randomized benchmarking in measurement-based quantum computing journal, September 2016

Characterizing universal gate sets via dihedral benchmarking journal, December 2015

Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking journal, December 2012

Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking journal, March 2013

Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes journal, June 2005

Quantum operation time reversal journal, March 2008

Demonstration of robust quantum gate tomography via randomized benchmarking journal, November 2015

Randomized benchmarking with confidence journal, October 2014

Completely positive linear maps on complex matrices
journal, June 1975

An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity
journal, October 2014

Optimal Quantum Control Using Randomized Benchmarking
journal, June 2014

Choi matrices, norms and entanglement associated with positive maps on matrix algebras
journal, January 2012

Randomized Benchmarking of Single-Qubit Gates in a 2D Array of Neutral-Atom Qubits
journal, March 2015

Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit
journal, January 2016

Robust Characterization of Loss Rates
journal, August 2015

Scalable noise estimation with random unitary operators
journal, September 2005

Self-consistent quantum process tomography
journal, June 2013

Randomized benchmarking of quantum gates
journal, January 2008

Demonstration of a quantum error detection code using a square lattice of four superconducting qubits
journal, April 2015

Characterizing errors on qubit operations via iterative randomized benchmarking
journal, January 2016

Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
journal, April 2014

Quantifying the quantum gate fidelity of single-atom spin qubits in silicon by randomized benchmarking
journal, March 2015

Exact and approximate unitary 2-designs and their application to fidelity estimation
journal, July 2009

Implementing a strand of a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computing fabric
journal, June 2014

Scalable and Robust Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Processes
journal, May 2011

Electrically controlling single-spin qubits in a continuous microwave field
journal, April 2015

Accelerated randomized benchmarking
journal, January 2015

Effect of noise correlations on randomized benchmarking
journal, February 2016

Investigating the limits of randomized benchmarking protocols
journal, June 2014

Estimating the coherence of noise
journal, November 2015

Rolling quantum dice with a superconducting qubit
journal, September 2014

Complete randomized benchmarking protocol accounting for leakage errors
journal, October 2015

Nonexponential fidelity decay in randomized benchmarking with low-frequency noise
journal, August 2015

Scalable randomised benchmarking of non-Clifford gates
journal, April 2016

Efficient Measurement of Quantum Gate Error by Interleaved Randomized Benchmarking
journal, August 2012

Demonstration of qubit operations below a rigorous fault tolerance threshold with gate set tomography
journal, February 2017

Symmetrized Characterization of Noisy Quantum Processes
journal, September 2007

Characterizing quantum gates via randomized benchmarking
journal, April 2012

Robust Extraction of Tomographic Information via Randomized Benchmarking
journal, March 2014

Randomized benchmarking in measurement-based quantum computing
journal, September 2016

Characterizing universal gate sets via dihedral benchmarking
journal, December 2015

Characterization of Addressability by Simultaneous Randomized Benchmarking
journal, December 2012

Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking
journal, March 2013

Distance measures to compare real and ideal quantum processes
journal, June 2005

Quantum operation time reversal
journal, March 2008

Demonstration of robust quantum gate tomography via randomized benchmarking
journal, November 2015

Randomized benchmarking with confidence
journal, October 2014