What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Title: What randomized benchmarking actually measures.

Full Record
Other Related Research

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:: Proctor, Timothy James; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael; Young, Kevin; Sarovar, Mohan; Blume-Kohout, Robin J

Publication Date:: Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2017

Research Org.:: Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States); Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: IARPA

OSTI Identifier:: 1427336

Report Number(s):: SAND2017-2703C
Journal ID: ISSN 0031-9007; 651681

DOE Contract Number:: AC04-94AL85000

Resource Type:: Conference

Resource Relation:: Journal Volume: 119; Journal Issue: 13; Conference: Proposed for presentation at the APS March Meeting held March 13-17, 2017 in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States.

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Formats


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, and Blume-Kohout, Robin J. What randomized benchmarking actually measures..  United States: N. p., 2017. 
        Web.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.

Copy to clipboard


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, & Blume-Kohout, Robin J. What randomized benchmarking actually measures..  United States.  doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.

Copy to clipboard


                    Proctor, Timothy James, Rudinger, Kenneth Michael, Young, Kevin, Sarovar, Mohan, and Blume-Kohout, Robin J. Wed .  
        "What randomized benchmarking actually measures.".  United States.  
        doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1427336.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1427336,

  title        = {What randomized benchmarking actually measures.},

  author       = {Proctor, Timothy James and Rudinger, Kenneth Michael and Young, Kevin and Sarovar, Mohan and Blume-Kohout, Robin J},

  abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},

  doi          = {10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502},

  journal      = {},

  number       = 13,

  volume       = 119,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2017},

  month        = {Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2017}

}

Copy to clipboard

Conference:

View Conference (1.90 MB)

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.130502

Other availability

Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures

Journal Article Proctor, Timothy ; Rudinger, Kenneth ; Young, Kevin ; ... - Physical Review Letters

Randomized benchmarking (RB) is widely used to measure an error rate of a set of quantum gates, by performing random circuits that would do nothing if the gates were perfect. In the limit of no finite-sampling error, the exponential decay rate of the observable survival probabilities, versus circuit length, yields a single error metric r. For Clifford gates with arbitrary small errors described by process matrices, r was believed to reliably correspond to the mean, over all Clifford gates, of the average gate infidelity between the imperfect gates and their ideal counterparts. We show that this quantity is not amore »« less
Cited by 6
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.130502

Full Text Available
Randomized Benchmarking doesn?t measure what you (probably) think it does.

Conference Blume-Kohout, Robin J ; Proctor, Timothy James ; Rudinger, Kenneth Michael ; ...

Abstract not provided.
Full Text Available
What actually is meant by "proliferation resistance" in discussions of advanced nuclear fuel cycles?

Conference Avens, L. R. ; Stanbro, W. D. ; Eller, P. G.

The term 'proliferation resistance' is used to denote many different things in the context of nuclear fuel cycles. This range of meanings commonly leads to miscommunication between and within the nuclear fuel cycle and safeguards communities. With the hope of adding clarity to the dialogues, this paper describes some of the definitions that have been and are used (explicitly and implicitly) for 'proliferation resistance.' The focus is restricted to fuel cycles involving separations with particular emphasis on the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative, and some common fuel cycle paradigms are used to illustrate why imprecise definitions needlessly confuse communication. The evaluationmore »« less
Full Text Available
Discomfort Glare: What Do We Actually Know?

Journal Article Clear, Robert D. - Lighting Research and Technology

We reviewed glare models with an eye for missing conditions or inconsistencies. We found ambiguities as to when to use small source versus large source models, and as to what constitutes a glare source in a complex scene. We also found surprisingly little information validating the assumed independence of the factors driving glare. A barrier to progress in glare research is the lack of a standardized dependent measure of glare. We inverted the glare models to predict luminance, and compared model predictions against the 1949 Luckiesh and Guth data that form the basis of many of them. The models performmore »« less
DOI: 10.1177/1477153512444527

Full Text Available
Loss of off-site power to safety-related buses even when off-site power is actually available at the plant

Conference Chopra, O. - Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc.; (United States)

The off-site power system is the preferred source of power for the power plant. This system includes the grid, the transmission lines, transformers, switchyard components, and associated control systems provided to supply electric power to safety-related equipment and other equipment. The function of the off-site power system (assuming that the emergency on-site power systems are not available) is to provide sufficient capacity and capability to assure that the specified acceptable fuel design limits and design conditions of the reactor coolant pressure boundary will not be exceeded and to ensure that core cooling, containment integrity, and other vital functions will bemore »« less

Similar Records