skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Analytical Cost Metrics : Days of Future Past

 [1];  [1];  [2]
  1. Colorado State University
  2. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Computer Science; Mathematics; optimization, software/hardware codesign, compiling, performance prediction

Citation Formats

Prajapati, Nirmal, Rajopadhye, Sanjay, and Djidjev, Hristo Nikolov. Analytical Cost Metrics : Days of Future Past. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.2172/1422949.
Prajapati, Nirmal, Rajopadhye, Sanjay, & Djidjev, Hristo Nikolov. Analytical Cost Metrics : Days of Future Past. United States. doi:10.2172/1422949.
Prajapati, Nirmal, Rajopadhye, Sanjay, and Djidjev, Hristo Nikolov. 2018. "Analytical Cost Metrics : Days of Future Past". United States. doi:10.2172/1422949.
title = {Analytical Cost Metrics : Days of Future Past},
author = {Prajapati, Nirmal and Rajopadhye, Sanjay and Djidjev, Hristo Nikolov},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.2172/1422949},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2018,
month = 2

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • Over the past 30 years, wind power has become a mainstream source of electricity generation around the world. However, the future of wind power will depend a great deal on the ability of the industry to continue to achieve cost of energy reductions. In this summary report, developed as part of the International Energy Agency Wind Implementing Agreement Task 26, titled 'The Cost of Wind Energy,' we provide a review of historical costs, evaluate near-term market trends, review the methods used to estimate long-term cost trajectories, and summarize the range of costs projected for onshore wind energy across an arraymore » of forward-looking studies and scenarios. We also highlight the influence of high-level market variables on both past and future wind energy costs.« less
  • At the request of DOE, Pullman Kellogg has investigated the costs and technical advantages of extending a planned 15-day demonstration run of the Westinghouse process development unit to 30 days. This reactor, in Waltz Mill, Pennsylvania, has been operated during test runs over a two-year period in both air-blown and oxygen-blown modes with a variety of coal feedstocks. Kellogg obtained reactor operating data, descriptions and costs of additional hardware required, and information regarding other costs from Westinghouse. Based on its investigation, Kellogg offers these general conclusions: analysis of operating data and the dynamics of the gasifier indicate that a 15-daymore » length for the demonstration run should be sufficcient to allow any slowly-developing effects to be observed; and the extra cost for extending the run to 30 days is $0.8 to 0.9 million based on Westinghouse information which seems satisfactory. Other factors which might affect the decision are discussed briefly. (LTN)« less
  • The Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF) will use Colemanite bearing concrete neutron absorber panels credited with attenuating neutron flux in the criticality design analyses and shielding operators from radiation. The Savannah River National Laboratory is tasked with measuring the total density, partial hydrogen density, and partial boron density of the colemanite concrete. Samples 8.1.2, 8.2.2, 8.3.2, and 8.4.2 were received on 8/1/2012 and analyzed after curing for 28 days. The average total density measured by the ASTM method C 642 was 2.09 g/cm{sup 3}, within the lower bound of 1.88 g/cm{sup 3}. The average partial hydrogen density was 7.48E-02more » g/cm{sup 3} as measured using method ASTM E 1311 and met the lower bound of 6.04E-02 g/cm{sup 3}. The average measured partial boron density was 1.71E-01 g/cm{sup 3} which met the lower bound of 1.65E-01 g/cm{sup 3} measured by the ASTM C 1301 method.« less
  • This technical report describes the process for selecting and applying the building cost and performance metrics for measuring sustainably designed buildings in comparison to traditionally designed buildings.