skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comprehensive Assessment of Global Surface Net Radiation Products and Uncertainty Analysis

ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing China
  2. Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park MD USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 123; Journal Issue: 4; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2018-03-09 11:05:44; Journal ID: ISSN 2169-897X
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Jia, Aolin, Liang, Shunlin, Jiang, Bo, Zhang, Xiaotong, and Wang, Guoxin. Comprehensive Assessment of Global Surface Net Radiation Products and Uncertainty Analysis. United States: N. p., 2018. Web. doi:10.1002/2017JD027903.
Jia, Aolin, Liang, Shunlin, Jiang, Bo, Zhang, Xiaotong, & Wang, Guoxin. Comprehensive Assessment of Global Surface Net Radiation Products and Uncertainty Analysis. United States. doi:10.1002/2017JD027903.
Jia, Aolin, Liang, Shunlin, Jiang, Bo, Zhang, Xiaotong, and Wang, Guoxin. 2018. "Comprehensive Assessment of Global Surface Net Radiation Products and Uncertainty Analysis". United States. doi:10.1002/2017JD027903.
title = {Comprehensive Assessment of Global Surface Net Radiation Products and Uncertainty Analysis},
author = {Jia, Aolin and Liang, Shunlin and Jiang, Bo and Zhang, Xiaotong and Wang, Guoxin},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1002/2017JD027903},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres},
number = 4,
volume = 123,
place = {United States},
year = 2018,
month = 2

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on February 18, 2019
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript

Save / Share:
  • Two techniques of uncertainty analysis were applied to a mathematical model that estimates the dose-equivalent to man from the concentration of radioactivity in air, water, and food. The response-surface method involved screening of the model to determine the important parameters, development of the response-surface equation, calculating the moments using the response-surface model, and fitting a Pearson or Johnson distribution using the calculated moments. The second method sampled model inputs by Latin hypercube methods and iteratively simulated the model to obtain an empirical estimation of the cdf. Comparison of the two methods indicates that it is often difficult to ascertain themore » adequacy or reliability of the response-surface method. The empirical method is simpler to implement and, because all model inputs are included in the analysis, it is also a more reliable estimator of the cumulative distribution function of the model output than the response-surface method. 28 references, 2 figures, 6 tables.« less
  • Global datasets of surface radiation budget (SRB) have been obtained from satellite programs. These satellite-based estimates need validation with ground-truth observations. This study validates the estimates of monthly mean surface insolation contained two satellite-based SRB datasets with the surface measurements made at worldwide radiation stations from the Global Energy Balance Archive (GEBA). One dataset was developed from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) using the algorithm of LI et al. (ERBE/SRB), and the other from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) using the algorithm of Pinker and Laszlo and that of Staylor (GEWEX/SRB). Since the ERBE/SRB data contain themore » surface net solar radiation only, the values of surface insolation were derived by making use of the surface albedo data contained in the GEWEX/SRB product. The resulting surface insolation has a bias error near zero and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) between 8 and 28 W m{sup -2}. The RMSE is mainly associated with poor representation of surface observations within a grid cell. When the number of surface observations are sufficient, the random error is estimated to be about 5 W m{sup -2} with present satellite-based estimates. In addition to demonstrating the strength of retrieving method, the small random error demonstrates how well the ERBE derives the monthly mean fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA). A larger scatter is found for the comparison of transmissivity than for that of insolation. Month to month comparison of insolation reveals a weak seasonal trend in bias error with an amplitude of about 3 W m{sup -2}. As for the insolation data from the GEWEX/SRB, larger bias errors of 5-10 W m{sup -2} are evident with stronger seasonal trends and almost identical RMSEs. 35 refs., 10 figs., 4 tabs.« less
  • Purpose: To promote the rational use of scarce research funding, scholars have developed methods for the systematic identification and prioritization of health research needs. The Radiation Oncology Institute commissioned an independent, comprehensive assessment of research needs for the advancement of radiation oncology care. Methods and Materials: The research needs assessment used a mixed-method, qualitative and quantitative social scientific approach, including structured interviews with diverse stakeholders, focus groups, surveys of American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) members, and a prioritization exercise using a modified Delphi technique. Results: Six co-equal priorities were identified: (1) Identify and develop communication strategies to help patientsmore » and others better understand radiation therapy; (2) Establish a set of quality indicators for major radiation oncology procedures and evaluate their use in radiation oncology delivery; (3) Identify best practices for the management of radiation toxicity and issues in cancer survivorship; (4) Conduct comparative effectiveness studies related to radiation therapy that consider clinical benefit, toxicity (including quality of life), and other outcomes; (5) Assess the value of radiation therapy; and (6) Develop a radiation oncology registry. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this prioritization exercise is the only comprehensive and methodologically rigorous assessment of research needs in the field of radiation oncology. Broad dissemination of these findings is critical to maximally leverage the impact of this work, particularly because grant funding decisions are often made by committees on which highly specialized disciplines such as radiation oncology are not well represented.« less
  • Despite much scientific progress over many decades, the nature of global climate change remains highly uncertain, and the possibility of global climate catastrophe is one of the main concerns in public debates about global climate change. In this paper, we present a model which incorporates the risk of climate catastrophe in an analysis of greenhouse gas abatement strategy. In this model, the timing and severity of climate catastrophe are treated probabilistically. The impacts of key uncertainties on optimal policy are analyzed, and the expected values of additional information that reduces the uncertainty associated with the world economy, carbon cycle, climatemore » change, and climate damage are estimated. 18 refs., 4 figs., 4 tabs.« less