skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Assessing the extent of non-stationary biases in GCMs

Authors:
; ORCiD logo;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1416465
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Hydrology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 549; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2018-01-10 12:47:18; Journal ID: ISSN 0022-1694
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
Netherlands
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Nahar, Jannatun, Johnson, Fiona, and Sharma, Ashish. Assessing the extent of non-stationary biases in GCMs. Netherlands: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.045.
Nahar, Jannatun, Johnson, Fiona, & Sharma, Ashish. Assessing the extent of non-stationary biases in GCMs. Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.045.
Nahar, Jannatun, Johnson, Fiona, and Sharma, Ashish. 2017. "Assessing the extent of non-stationary biases in GCMs". Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.045.
@article{osti_1416465,
title = {Assessing the extent of non-stationary biases in GCMs},
author = {Nahar, Jannatun and Johnson, Fiona and Sharma, Ashish},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.03.045},
journal = {Journal of Hydrology},
number = C,
volume = 549,
place = {Netherlands},
year = 2017,
month = 6
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on April 6, 2018
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript

Save / Share:
  • Here, reproducing characteristics of observed sea ice extent remains an important climate modeling challenge. This study describes several approaches to improve how model biases in total sea ice distribution are quantified, and applies them to historically forced simulations contributed to phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). The quantity of hemispheric total sea ice area, or some measure of its equatorward extent, is often used to evaluate model performance. A new approach is introduced that investigates additional details about the structure of model errors, with an aim to reduce the potential impact of compensating errors when gauging differencesmore » between simulated and observed sea ice. Using multiple observational datasets, several new methods are applied to evaluate the climatological spatial distribution and the annual cycle of sea ice cover in 41 CMIP5 models. It is shown that in some models, error compensation can be substantial, for example resulting from too much sea ice in one region and too little in another. Error compensation tends to be larger in models that agree more closely with the observed total sea ice area, which may result from model tuning. The results herein suggest that consideration of only the total hemispheric sea ice area or extent can be misleading when quantitatively comparing how well models agree with observations. Further work is needed to fully develop robust methods to holistically evaluate the ability of models to capture the finescale structure of sea ice characteristics; however, the “sector scale” metric used here aids in reducing the impact of compensating errors in hemispheric integrals.« less
  • Municipal waste incinerators often employ the well-known Thermal Denox method of ammonia injection to reduce nitrogen dioxide emissions in stack effluents. Waste incinerators generate HCl during the combustion of plastics and other waste products. Because of the presence of these substances in emissions, concerns have been raised about their influence upon EPA's Method 101A (M101A) analytical procedure. This article describes the laboratory study designed to address these concerns. 6 refs., 1 fig., 2 tabs.
  • Methods of measuring and defining toxic and hazardous emissions in the environment have been developed as a result of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), high public and political interest and the efforts of the US EPA. Although numerous substances fall into the toxic and hazardous category, organic compounds are the most complex and difficult to measure. Appropriate sampling and analytical methods depend on the compounds of interest, the source type, compound selectivity/sensitivity, the desired level of detection, and the intended use of the measurements and collected data. Considerations such as cost, needmore » for real time (continuous) versus instantaneous or short term data, compatibility with other compounds/parameters to be measured, need for on site analysis versus on site collection and off site analysis may all be equally important in the selective process. This paper attempts to address the considerations of common importance in the selection of sampling and analytical methods for many applications. The sampling methods and analytical methods are summarized in separate tables because the sampling methods tend to be more source specific than are the analytical methods. A brief but comprehensive discussion of each method with references is included in the tabular listing.« less