skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Techno-economic assessment of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine

; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E)
OSTI Identifier:
Grant/Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Journal of Membrane Science
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 535; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2018-01-09 15:55:52; Journal ID: ISSN 0376-7388
Country of Publication:

Citation Formats

Hickenbottom, Kerri L., Vanneste, Johan, Miller-Robbie, Leslie, Deshmukh, Akshay, Elimelech, Menachem, Heeley, Michael B., and Cath, Tzahi Y.. Techno-economic assessment of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine. Netherlands: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.034.
Hickenbottom, Kerri L., Vanneste, Johan, Miller-Robbie, Leslie, Deshmukh, Akshay, Elimelech, Menachem, Heeley, Michael B., & Cath, Tzahi Y.. Techno-economic assessment of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine. Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.034.
Hickenbottom, Kerri L., Vanneste, Johan, Miller-Robbie, Leslie, Deshmukh, Akshay, Elimelech, Menachem, Heeley, Michael B., and Cath, Tzahi Y.. 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine". Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.034.
title = {Techno-economic assessment of a closed-loop osmotic heat engine},
author = {Hickenbottom, Kerri L. and Vanneste, Johan and Miller-Robbie, Leslie and Deshmukh, Akshay and Elimelech, Menachem and Heeley, Michael B. and Cath, Tzahi Y.},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.034},
journal = {Journal of Membrane Science},
number = C,
volume = 535,
place = {Netherlands},
year = 2017,
month = 8

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
This content will become publicly available on May 3, 2018
Publisher's Accepted Manuscript

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:
  • This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of corn stover fired process heating (PH) and the combined heat and power (CHP) generation systems for a typical corn ethanol plant (ethanol production capacity of 170 dam3). Discounted cash flow method was used to estimate both the capital and operating costs of each system and compared with the existing natural gas fired heating system. Environmental impact assessment of using corn stover, coal and natural gas in the heat and/or power generation systems was also evaluated. Coal fired process heating (PH) system had the lowest annual operating cost due to the low fuel cost,more » but had the highest environmental and human toxicity impacts. The proposed combined heat and power (CHP) generation system required about 137 Gg of corn stover to generate 9.5 MW of electricity and 52.3 MW of process heat with an overall CHP efficiency of 83.3%. Stover fired CHP system would generate an annual savings of 3.6 M$ with an payback period of 6 y. Economics of the coal fired CHP system was very attractive compared to the stover fired CHP system due to lower fuel cost. But the greenhouse gas emissions per Mg of fuel for the coal fired CHP system was 32 times higher than that of stover fired CHP system. Corn stover fired heat and power generation system for a corn ethanol plant can improve the net energy balance and add environmental benefits to the corn to ethanol biorefinery.« less
  • Fundamental techno-economical parameters governing an open loop and a closed loop geothermal district energy system are briefly discussed. The maximum allowable closed loop distance between the geothermal plant and the district entry point is directly related to the thermal capacity of the system. A case study is presented, which indicates that a closed loop distance covering 31 kilometers between the well head and the district entry point is feasible for a 89.1 MW(t) district capacity for the City of Denizli in Tuerkiye. The same study reveals that the common base unit capital cost of 240 $/kW(t)-peak for a closed loopmore » system favorably compares with 480 $/kW(t)-peak for an open loop system for the same district capacity for the existing geothermal well output.« less
  • We present a hybrid osmotic heat engine (OHE) system that uses draw solutions with an organic solvent for enhanced thermal separation efficiency. The hybrid OHE system produces sustainable energy by combining pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) as a power generation stage and membrane distillation (MD) utilizing low-grade heat as a separation stage. While previous OHE systems employed aqueous electrolyte draw solutions, using methanol as a solvent is advantageous because methanol is highly volatile and has a lower heat capacity and enthalpy of vaporization than water. Hence, the thermal separation efficiency of a draw solution with methanol would be higher than that ofmore » an aqueous draw solution. In this study, we evaluated the performance of LiCl-methanol as a potential draw solution for a PRO-MD hybrid OHE system. The membrane transport properties as well as performance with LiCl methanol draw solution were evaluated using thin-film composite (TFC) PRO membranes and compared to the results obtained with a LiCl water draw solution. Experimental PRO methanol flux and maximum projected power density of 47.1 L m(-2) h(-1) and 72.1 W m(-2), respectively, were achieved with a 3 M LiCl-methanol draw solution. The overall efficiency of the hybrid OHE system was modeled by coupling the mass and energy flows between the thermal separation (MD) and power generation (PRO) stages under conditions with and without heat recovery. The modeling results demonstrate higher ORE energy efficiency with the LiCl methanol draw solution compared to that with the LiCl water draw solution under practical operating conditions (i.e., heat recovery <90%). We discuss the implications of the results for converting low-grade heat to power.« less
  • About 97 million tons of waste plastics, paper, oils, and tires are generated annually in the United States. The vast majority of this waste is paper, accounting for more than 73 million tons, and the second most abundant waste is plastic, accounting for more than 16 million tons. The number of waste passenger tire equivalents generated in the United States is about 300 million; considerably more than the population. On a rubber basis, this is approximately equal to 1.6 million tons. For waste oils, the average rate of annual generation is about 4.8 million tons, equivalent to about 32 millionmore » barrels. This rate of waste generation constitutes a major waste management problem with respect to land availability for landfills and public health and pollution concerns. Mandatory recycling of waste paper and plastics is in effect in several states, but the rate of generation of these wastes exceeds existing demand. This paper describes the coprocessing of coal with wastes.« less