skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comment on, “On the influence of the electron dose-rate on the HRTEM image contrast”, by Juri Barthel, Markus Lentzen, Andreas Thust, ULTRAM12246 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.016

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) (SC-22)
OSTI Identifier:
1414477
Grant/Contract Number:
AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Ultramicroscopy
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 179; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2017-12-20 22:22:35; Journal ID: ISSN 0304-3991
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
Netherlands
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Kisielowski, C., Calderon, H. A., Chen, F. R., Helveg, S., Jinschek, J. R., Specht, P., and Van Dyck, D. Comment on, “On the influence of the electron dose-rate on the HRTEM image contrast”, by Juri Barthel, Markus Lentzen, Andreas Thust, ULTRAM12246 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.016. Netherlands: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.002.
Kisielowski, C., Calderon, H. A., Chen, F. R., Helveg, S., Jinschek, J. R., Specht, P., & Van Dyck, D. Comment on, “On the influence of the electron dose-rate on the HRTEM image contrast”, by Juri Barthel, Markus Lentzen, Andreas Thust, ULTRAM12246 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.016. Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.002.
Kisielowski, C., Calderon, H. A., Chen, F. R., Helveg, S., Jinschek, J. R., Specht, P., and Van Dyck, D. Tue . "Comment on, “On the influence of the electron dose-rate on the HRTEM image contrast”, by Juri Barthel, Markus Lentzen, Andreas Thust, ULTRAM12246 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.016". Netherlands. doi:10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.002.
@article{osti_1414477,
title = {Comment on, “On the influence of the electron dose-rate on the HRTEM image contrast”, by Juri Barthel, Markus Lentzen, Andreas Thust, ULTRAM12246 (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.11.016},
author = {Kisielowski, C. and Calderon, H. A. and Chen, F. R. and Helveg, S. and Jinschek, J. R. and Specht, P. and Van Dyck, D.},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.002},
journal = {Ultramicroscopy},
number = C,
volume = 179,
place = {Netherlands},
year = {Tue Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Tue Aug 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record at 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.04.002

Save / Share:
  • The Lambda(b) differential production cross section and the cross section ratio anti-Lambda(b)/Lambda(b) are measured as functions of transverse momentum pt(Lambda(b)) and rapidity abs(y(Lambda(b))) in pp collisions at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV using data collected by the CMS experiment at the LHC. The measurements are based on Lambda(b) decays reconstructed in the exclusive final state J/Psi Lambda, with the subsequent decays J/Psi to an opposite-sign muon pair and Lambda to proton pion, using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.9 inverse femtobarns. The product of the cross section times the branching ratio for Lambda(b) to J/Psi Lambda versusmore » pt(Lambda(b)) falls faster than that of b mesons. The measured value of the cross section times the branching ratio for pt(Lambda(b)) > 10 GeV and abs(y(Lambda(b))) < 2.0 is 1.06 +/- 0.06 +/- 0.12 nb, and the integrated cross section ratio for anti-Lambda(b)/Lambda(b) is 1.02 +/- 0.07 +/- 0.09, where the uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.« less
  • Themore » $$\Upsilon$$(1S), $$\Upsilon$$(2S), and $$\Upsilon$$(3S) production cross sections are measured using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 35.8 $$\pm$$ 1.4 inverse picobarns of proton-proton collisions at $$\sqrt{s}$$ = 7 TeV, collected with the CMS detector at the LHC. Upsilon resonances are identified through their decays to dimuons. Integrated over the $$\Upsilon$$ transverse momentum range $$p_{t}^{\Upsilon} \lt$$ 50GeV and rapidity range |$$y^\Upsilon$$| $$\lt$$ 2.4, and assuming unpolarized Upsilon production, the products of the Upsilon production cross sections and dimuon branching fractions are \begin{equation*}\sigma(pp \to \Upsilon(1S) X) . B(\Upsilon(1S) \to \mu^+ \mu^-) = (8.55 \pm 0.05^{+0.56}_{-0.50} \pm 0.34) nb,\end{equation*} \begin{equation*}\sigma(pp \to \Upsilon(2S) X) . B(\Upsilon(2S) \to \mu^+ \mu^-) = (2.21 \pm 0.03^{+0.16}_{-0.14} \pm 0.09) nb,\end{equation*} \begin{equation*}\sigma(pp \to \Upsilon(3S) X) . B(\Upsilon(3S) \to \mu^+ \mu^-) = (1.11 \pm 0.02^{+0.10}_{-0.08} \pm 0.04) nb, \end{equation*} where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, and the third is from the uncertainty in the integrated luminosity. differential cross sections in bins of transverse momentum and rapidity, and the cross section ratios are presented. Cross section measurements performed within a restricted muon kinematic range and not corrected for acceptance are also provided. These latter measurements are independent of Upsilon polarization assumptions. results are compared to theoretical predictions and previous measurements.« less
  • We present the first measurements of the differential cross section dσ/dp γ Τ for the production of an isolated photon in association with at least two b-quark jets. The measurements consider photons with rapidities |y γ | < 1.0 and transverse momenta 30 < p γ Τ < 200 GeV. The b-quark jets are required to have p jet Τ > 15 GeVand |γ jet| < 1.5. The ratio of differential production cross sections for γ + 2 b-jets to γ +b-jet as a function of p γ Τ is also presented. The results are based on the proton–antiproton collisionmore » data at √s = 1.96 TeV collected with the D0 detector at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider. As a result, the measured cross sections and their ratios are compared to the next-to-leading order perturbative QCD calculations as well as predictions based on the k Τ-factorization approach and those from the sherpa and pythia Monte Carlo event generators.« less