skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Quantifying Uncertainty in an EOS Model


No abstract provided.

 [1];  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC). Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) (SC-21)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
71 CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS; Equation of State, Bayesian Methods, High Explosives

Citation Formats

Andrews, Stephen Arthur, and Fraser, Andrew Mcleod. Quantifying Uncertainty in an EOS Model. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.2172/1412915.
Andrews, Stephen Arthur, & Fraser, Andrew Mcleod. Quantifying Uncertainty in an EOS Model. United States. doi:10.2172/1412915.
Andrews, Stephen Arthur, and Fraser, Andrew Mcleod. 2017. "Quantifying Uncertainty in an EOS Model". United States. doi:10.2172/1412915.
title = {Quantifying Uncertainty in an EOS Model},
author = {Andrews, Stephen Arthur and Fraser, Andrew Mcleod},
abstractNote = {No abstract provided.},
doi = {10.2172/1412915},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2017,
month =

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The quantification of uncertainty in long-range transport model predictions and the implications of these uncertainties on formulations of control policy have been the subject of investigations by both the United States and Canada. To more fully address these topics, the American Meteorological Society (AMS) was requested to convene a workshop in September 1984 at the National Academy of Sciences Study Center in Woods Hole, Massachusetts. Joint sponsorship was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Canada, and the Atmospheric Environment Service of Environment Canada. The AMS workshop was three and one-half days in durationmore » and involved participation by 38 scientists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Five invited draft chapters were prepared prior to the workshop to provide a focus for discussion, i.e., to raise the pertinent scientific issues to be addressed by the participants. This AMS publication contains the complete documentation of the workshop including the five invited chapters, recent developments in model evaluation and sensitivity analysis, and the reports of the Eulerian and Lagrangian working groups.« less
  • The American Meteorological Society, under sponsorship from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Atmospheric Environment Service, Canada, and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Canada, convened a workshop in September 1984 to address one aspect of the long-range transport modeling which has become a topic of considerable concern, i.e., the quantification of uncertainty in long-range transport-model predictions.
  • The clear-sky climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols has been shown to be of sufficient magnitude to mask the effects of anthropogenic greenhouse gases over large regions. Anthropogenic aerosols are composed of a variety of aerosol types including water-soluble inorganic species (e.g., sulfate, nitrate, ammonium), organic condensed species, elemental or black carbon, and mineral dust. Estimates of the clear-sky forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosols and by organic biomass-burning aerosols have been published previously. Here we estimate the uncertainty in the forcing by these aerosol types. Estimates of the clear-sky forcing by other anthropogenic aerosol types do not even exist though themore » forcing by these aerosol types is thought to be smaller than that by sulfate and biomass burning aerosols.« less
  • We applied the AMIE procedure, developed by Richmond and Kamide, to three periods: 23-24 July 1983, 18-19 Jan 1984 and 19 Sep 1984. The mapping procedure obtains optimal estimates of electrodynamic patterns from basis functions multiplied by an appropriate set of coefficients which are determined from a constrained least squares fit to the data. We show the impact of several additions to the procedure and analyze some of the geophysics implied by our results. New estimates of auroral conductance are incorporated from satellite particle detectors and a satellite X-ray imager. We use this new information to produce global estimates ofmore » conductance and to study the effect of uncertainty in those estimates on the estimates of the polar electric field structure. We also incorporate new (but somewhat indirect) observations relating to the electric field: satellite magnetometer data and the vertical component of the ground magnetometer data. Addition of these data, as well as, increasing the number of estimated coefficients tend to reduce the uncertainty in the electric field estimates. Our results demonstrate the ability of the AMIE procedure to define the temporal and spatial development of several important solar-wind-magnetosphere-ionospheric interactions. Mappings of ionospheric response to the interplanetary Magnetic Field (IMF) east-west component is in excellent agreement with currently accepted theory. We observe enhancements of DP1 and DP2 current systems.« less
  • Liquid-metal-cooled fast reactors in the form of sodium-cooled fast reactors have been successfully built and tested in the U.S. and throughout the world. However, no fast reactor has operated in the U.S. for nearly fourteen years. More importantly, the U.S. has not constructed a fast reactor in nearly 30 years. In addition to reestablishing the necessary industrial infrastructure, the development, testing, and licensing of a new, advanced fast reactor concept will likely require a significant base technology program that will rely more heavily on modeling and simulation than has been done in the past. The ability to quantify uncertainty inmore » modeling and simulations will be an important part of any experimental program and can provide added confidence that established design limits and safety margins are appropriate. In addition, there is an increasing demand from the nuclear industry for best-estimate analysis methods to provide confidence bounds along with their results. The ability to quantify uncertainty will be an important component of modeling that is used to support design, testing, and experimental programs. Three avenues of UQ investigation are proposed. Two relatively new approaches are described which can be directly coupled to simulation codes currently being developed under the Advanced Simulation and Modeling program within the Reactor Campaign. A third approach, based on robust Monte Carlo methods, can be used in conjunction with existing reactor analysis codes as a means of verification and validation of the more detailed approaches.« less