skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: SimCCS2.0: An Open-Source Tool for CCUS Decision Support (Task 5.3 and 5.4)

ORCiD logo [1]; ORCiD logo [1];  [2];  [2]
  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory
  2. Indiana Geological and Water Survey
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: CERC Webinar ; 2017-12-07 - 2017-12-07 ; Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States
Country of Publication:
United States
Computer Science; Earth Sciences

Citation Formats

Yaw, Sean Patrick, Middleton, Richard Stephen, Ellett, Kevin, and Wang, Ian. SimCCS2.0: An Open-Source Tool for CCUS Decision Support (Task 5.3 and 5.4). United States: N. p., 2017. Web.
Yaw, Sean Patrick, Middleton, Richard Stephen, Ellett, Kevin, & Wang, Ian. SimCCS2.0: An Open-Source Tool for CCUS Decision Support (Task 5.3 and 5.4). United States.
Yaw, Sean Patrick, Middleton, Richard Stephen, Ellett, Kevin, and Wang, Ian. 2017. "SimCCS2.0: An Open-Source Tool for CCUS Decision Support (Task 5.3 and 5.4)". United States. doi:.
title = {SimCCS2.0: An Open-Source Tool for CCUS Decision Support (Task 5.3 and 5.4)},
author = {Yaw, Sean Patrick and Middleton, Richard Stephen and Ellett, Kevin and Wang, Ian},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2017,
month =

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • Selection of remediation alternatives for large groundwater plumes containing chlorinated solvents are often complex and difficult, in part because they involve competing objectives, e.g. reduction of health risk vs. increased cost. The Department of Energy (DOE) supported development of a Decision Tool to provide a risk-based process for evaluating and comparing remedial options fairly and consistently. The Decision Tool is also intended to provide a process for constructive discussion of alternatives among the appropriate stakeholders. To use the Decision Tool, which is implemented in an Excel spreadsheet, a site manager must evaluate each alternative being considered against six objectives usingmore » detailed performance metrics. The impacts of each alternative on the individual objectives are combined through a formal multi-attribute utility analysis. Predetermined or user-specified relative weights for the objectives can be used, and a variety of visual outputs are generated. The usefulness and validity of the Decision Tool was demonstrated through a Pilot Study application for the A-Area Burning Rubble Pits/Miscellaneous Chemical Basin groundwater plume at the DOE Savannah River Site. The Pilot Study results provided a new perspective on the alternatives and objectives by demonstrating: 1) the relatively small public health risks associated with groundwater contamination at this site, 2) that more active approaches had benefits over monitored natural attenuation (MNA) in reducing time required to meet the maximum contaminant level (MCL) and maximizing regulatory responsiveness, 3) that MNA has acceptable public and worker health and safety risks, while enabling a reduction in costs. Use of the Decision Tool also promoted valuable discussion among the various stakeholders, and provided options for sensitivity analyses that can quickly be visualized to assess relative benefits of each of the alternatives. (authors)« less
  • Congress has enacted legislation specifying Yucca Mountain, Nevada, for characterization as the candidate site for the disposal of spent fuel and high-level wastes and has authorized a monitored retrievable storage (MRS) facility if one is warranted. Nevertheless, the exact configuration of the facilities making up the Federal Waste Management System (FWMS) was not specified. This has left the Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM) the responsibility for assuring the design of a safe and reliable disposal system. In order to assist in the analysis of potential configuration alternatives, operating strategies, and other factors for the FWMS and its variousmore » elements, a decision-support tool known as the systems integration operations/logistics model (SOLMOD) was developed. SOLMOD is a discrete event simulation model that emulates the movement and interaction of equipment and radioactive waste as it is processed through the FWMS - from pickup at reactor pools to emplacement. The model can be used to measure the impacts of different operating schedules and rules, system configurations, and equipment and other resource availabilities on the performance of processes comprising the FWMS and how these factors combine to determine overall system performance. SOLMOD can assist in identifying bottlenecks and can be used to assess capacity utilization of specific equipment and staff as well as overall system resilience.« less
  • This paper discusses completion of major demonstration of the systems Integration Modeling system (SIMS). That system is designed to provide an analytic tool to support decisions relating to alternative Federal Waste Management System (FWMS) configurations and operating strategies. This paper provides an overview of SIMS and describes the results of the demonstrations, termed SIMS 89/1.
  • Environmental restoration and management decisions facing the US Department of Energy require balancing trade-offs between diverse land uses and impacts over multiple spatial and temporal scales. Many types of environmental data have been collected for the Hanford Site and the Columbia River in Washington State over the past fifty years. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) is integrating these data into a Geographic Information System (GIS) based computer decision support tool. This tool provides a comprehensive and concise description of the current environmental landscape that can be used to evaluate the ecological and monetary trade-offs between future land use, restoration andmore » remediation options before action is taken. Ecological impacts evaluated include effects to individual species of concern and habitat loss and fragmentation. Monetary impacts include those associated with habitat mitigation. The tool is organized as both a browsing tool for educational purposes, and as a framework that leads a project manager through the steps needed to be in compliance with environmental requirements.« less