Comparison of an Electrothermal Plasma Source to a Light Gas Gun for Launching Large Cryogenic Pellets for Tokamak Disruption Mitigation
Abstract
Future large tokamaks, such as ITER, will require a reliable technique for rapid energy dissipation to mitigate harmful effects from disruptions. Two main methods developed for disruption mitigation are massive gas injection and shattered pellet injection (SPI). Argon and neon are favorable materials for both injection methods. When launching pellets with SPI, it has proven difficult to launch intact pellets of pure argon and/or neon owing to their high material strength at cryogenic temperatures. In this work, we compare two methods of launching relatively high-Z pellets. An electrothermal plasma source is an experimental alternative to the fast opening, high-pressure, gas valve. The electrothermal source was used to launch Lexan™ pellets with approximately the same size and mass of comparable mixed gas (D 2 and Ne) cryogenic pellets launched by gas guns. As a result, we describe comparisons of achieved pellet velocities, energy efficiencies of each system, and the implications of implementing each respective method on an operating tokamak.
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE
- OSTI Identifier:
- 1410950
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22725
- Resource Type:
- Journal Article
- Journal Name:
- Fusion Science and Technology
- Additional Journal Information:
- Journal Volume: 73; Journal Issue: 1; Journal ID: ISSN 1536-1055
- Publisher:
- American Nuclear Society
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY; Tokamak disruption mitigation; pellet injection; electrothermal plasma source
Citation Formats
Gebhart, T. E., Combs, S. K., and Baylor, Larry R. Comparison of an Electrothermal Plasma Source to a Light Gas Gun for Launching Large Cryogenic Pellets for Tokamak Disruption Mitigation. United States: N. p., 2017.
Web. doi:10.1080/15361055.2017.1372683.
Gebhart, T. E., Combs, S. K., & Baylor, Larry R. Comparison of an Electrothermal Plasma Source to a Light Gas Gun for Launching Large Cryogenic Pellets for Tokamak Disruption Mitigation. United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2017.1372683
Gebhart, T. E., Combs, S. K., and Baylor, Larry R. Thu .
"Comparison of an Electrothermal Plasma Source to a Light Gas Gun for Launching Large Cryogenic Pellets for Tokamak Disruption Mitigation". United States. https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2017.1372683.
@article{osti_1410950,
title = {Comparison of an Electrothermal Plasma Source to a Light Gas Gun for Launching Large Cryogenic Pellets for Tokamak Disruption Mitigation},
author = {Gebhart, T. E. and Combs, S. K. and Baylor, Larry R.},
abstractNote = {Future large tokamaks, such as ITER, will require a reliable technique for rapid energy dissipation to mitigate harmful effects from disruptions. Two main methods developed for disruption mitigation are massive gas injection and shattered pellet injection (SPI). Argon and neon are favorable materials for both injection methods. When launching pellets with SPI, it has proven difficult to launch intact pellets of pure argon and/or neon owing to their high material strength at cryogenic temperatures. In this work, we compare two methods of launching relatively high-Z pellets. An electrothermal plasma source is an experimental alternative to the fast opening, high-pressure, gas valve. The electrothermal source was used to launch Lexan™ pellets with approximately the same size and mass of comparable mixed gas (D2 and Ne) cryogenic pellets launched by gas guns. As a result, we describe comparisons of achieved pellet velocities, energy efficiencies of each system, and the implications of implementing each respective method on an operating tokamak.},
doi = {10.1080/15361055.2017.1372683},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1410950},
journal = {Fusion Science and Technology},
issn = {1536-1055},
number = 1,
volume = 73,
place = {United States},
year = {2017},
month = {10}
}
Other availability
Find in Google Scholar
Search WorldCat to find libraries that may hold this journal
Save to My Library
You must Sign In or Create an Account in order to save documents to your library.
Works referenced in this record:
Recent advances in electrothermal-chemical gun propulsion at United Defense, L.P
journal, January 1997
- Chaboki, A.; Zelenak, S.; Isle, B.
- IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 33, Issue 1
The use of an electrothermal plasma gun to simulate the extremely high heat flux conditions of a tokamak disruption
journal, September 1993
- Gilligan, John; Bourham, Mohamed
- Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 12, Issue 3
First demonstration of rapid shutdown using neon shattered pellet injection for thermal quench mitigation on DIII-D
journal, March 2016
- Commaux, N.; Shiraki, D.; Baylor, L. R.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 56, Issue 4
Ablation of Fusion Materials Exposed to High Heat Flux in an Electrothermal Plasma Discharge as a Simulation for Hard Disruption
journal, October 2013
- Echols, J. R.; Winfrey, A. L.
- Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 33, Issue 1
Ueber die zum Funkenübergang in Luft, Wasserstoff und Kohlensäure bei verschiedenen Drucken erforderliche Potentialdifferenz
journal, January 1889
- Paschen, Friedrich
- Annalen der Physik, Vol. 273, Issue 5
Optimization of Fusion Pellet Launch Velocity in an Electrothermal Mass Accelerator
journal, October 2013
- Gebhart, T. E.; Holladay, R. T.; Esmond, M. J.
- Journal of Fusion Energy, Vol. 33, Issue 1
Disruption Mitigation System Developments and Design for ITER
journal, September 2015
- Baylor, L. R.; Barbier, C. C.; Carmichael, J. R.
- Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 68, Issue 2
Disruption mitigation by massive gas injection in JET
journal, November 2011
- Lehnen, M.; Alonso, A.; Arnoux, G.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 51, Issue 12
Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the non-active phase to DT operation
journal, February 2014
- Loarte, A.; Huijsmans, G.; Futatani, S.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 54, Issue 3
Pellet fuelling and control of burning plasmas in ITER
journal, May 2007
- Baylor, L. R.; Parks, P. B.; Jernigan, T. C.
- Nuclear Fusion, Vol. 47, Issue 5
Solidification and Acceleration of Large Cryogenic Pellets Relevant for Plasma Disruption Mitigation
journal, September 2016
- Combs, S. K.; Meitner, S. J.; Gebhart, T. E.
- IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Vol. 44, Issue 9