skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Laboratory Strategy for the Future


This presentation describes the nuclear research facilities at LANL.

  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Hyde, Peter Alden. Laboratory Strategy for the Future. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.2172/1394962.
Hyde, Peter Alden. Laboratory Strategy for the Future. United States. doi:10.2172/1394962.
Hyde, Peter Alden. 2017. "Laboratory Strategy for the Future". United States. doi:10.2172/1394962.
title = {Laboratory Strategy for the Future},
author = {Hyde, Peter Alden},
abstractNote = {This presentation describes the nuclear research facilities at LANL.},
doi = {10.2172/1394962},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2017,
month = 9

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • ``Creating The Laboratory`s Future`` describes Livermore`s roles and responsibilities as a Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratory and sets the foundation for decisions about the Laboratory`s programs and operations. It summarizes Livermore`s near-term strategy, which builds on recent Lab achievements and world events affecting their future. It also discusses their programmatic and operational emphases and highlights program areas that the authors believe can grow through application of Lab science and technology. Creating the Laboratory`s Future reflects their very strong focus on national security, important changes in the character of their national security work, major efforts are under way to overhaulmore » their administrative and operational systems, and the continuing challenge of achieving national consensus on the role of the government in energy, environment, and the biosciences.« less
  • This paper reviews the purpose and role that tactical nuclear weapon systems can provide in supporting the National Military Strategy (NMS), and recommends requirements be determined using a strategy based upon political, economic and military national interests versus the current target-based strategy. To draw implications for the NMS, the analysis reviews current strategic policy guidance, summarizes the current definition of deterrence theory, and provides rationales for maintaining tactical nuclear weapon systems for deterrence and warfighting in regional contingency operations against nuclear-capable forces. Based upon this analysis, recommendations are provided for joint planning, doctrine, and training initiatives needed to enhance themore » efficacy of the armed services in achieving national security policy objectives.« less
  • Our defense strategy must focus our limited resources in those areas of greatest threat to our national interests. For years the ends and means of our national defense strategy have been out of balance. Given the changed nature of war and a remarkably different threat environment, we can achieve a balanced strategy. Unlike the world of the late 1940s and early 1950s when the strategy of containment was adopted, the threat today is low intensity conflict. Although the United States must maintain a nuclear force for deterrence, the United States should not be preparing to fight a large-scale war inmore » central Europe. Instead, compelled by budget cuts, the force structure should be modified into a lighter, more mobile force with ability to respond quickly anywhere in the world. Keywords: Military strategy, United States, National defense, Wartime, Theses. (RWJ)« less
  • In March 1984 the Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis undertook a study whose purpose was to examine current NATO maritime strategy and how it is being affected by the developing political environment in Western Europe, by Soviet strategy and the maritime threats it poses to the Alliance, by the effect of new technologies, by the debate over forward strategy and horizontal escalation, and by the impact of nuclear weapons and arms control initiatives. The research and analyses completed for the study are synthesized in the Final Summary Report, contained in this Volume. A more detailed treatment of specific themes addressedmore » in the study is to be found in Volume II, which contains the full text of all papers prepared for the study and the conference.« less
  • US domestic budget difficulties, and growing East Asian economics might now require the US to change its relationship with South Korea. The ROK's growing global stature, its economic vitality, and military strength indicate it is ready to take a more pronounced role in its own self-defense. US-ROK relations must become more reciprocal, giving the ROK more decision-sharing opportunities. The Nunn-Warner report does not go far enough in prescribing a US strategy toward East Asia in the next century. US must take a more active role in diplomatic initiatives aimed at reducing tensions in East Asia, specifically the Korean peninsula. Themore » US and the ROK should be developing combined strategies to deal with an eventual Korean unification. These two allies should also begin developing arms control strategies for the Korean peninsula. US should facilitate better ROK-Japan security relations. US should maintain diligence in Korea until North Korea opens.« less