skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Managing Ongoing EVSE Costs


The costs associated with EVSE begin with picking the best location and unit for the job, but they continue with electricity and network charges through the life of your vehicle. This presentation tells how to balance electricity demand charges and network management costs through smart planning at your program's inception.

  1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Federal Energy Management Program Office (EE-5F)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: Presented at Energy Exchange 2017, 15-17 August 2017, Tampa, Florida
Country of Publication:
United States
33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS; EVSE; EVs; charging costs; managed charging

Citation Formats

Hodge, Cabell. Managing Ongoing EVSE Costs. United States: N. p., 2017. Web.
Hodge, Cabell. Managing Ongoing EVSE Costs. United States.
Hodge, Cabell. Tue . "Managing Ongoing EVSE Costs". United States. doi:.
title = {Managing Ongoing EVSE Costs},
author = {Hodge, Cabell},
abstractNote = {The costs associated with EVSE begin with picking the best location and unit for the job, but they continue with electricity and network charges through the life of your vehicle. This presentation tells how to balance electricity demand charges and network management costs through smart planning at your program's inception.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Sep 05 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Tue Sep 05 00:00:00 EDT 2017}

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • The principles that United Technologies Corporation follow in maintaining its ongoing energy-management program are offered to other industries as an effective model. Assuming a well-founded program that has been in place for one or two years, 15 additional building blocks should be incorporated to give the program substance and direction. The 15 new elements range from internal goal-setting to external monitoring, emphasizing information gathering and communication. (DCK)
  • Companies that purchases and use chemicals and materials in their everyday operation are finding that disposing of these products is becoming increasingly expensive. These disposal and liability costs have been the motivating factor behind recent efforts at pollution prevention. This paper suggests an alternative approach: considering the full life-cycle costs of chemicals and materials at the time purchase decisions are made. Life-cycle cost is the sum of all the costs that a product is expected to incur from the time of its purchase, during its use, until the disposal of any wastes or by-products and beyond as long as liabilitiesmore » may remain. It represents the product's real cost to the company, and as such is a better basis for making cost-effective decisions. By using life-cycle costs to make decisions, companies can prevent uneconomical decisions on potentially hazardous materials and more effectively minimize overall costs. Life-cycle cost management can also help in the formulation of pollution prevention plans by identifying cost-effective waste-reduction alternatives. Although the concepts of life-cycle cost management are straightforward and intuitive, applying these concepts to real decisions may be challenging. This paper presents an overview of life-cycle cost management, discusses some of the challenges companies face applying this approach to real decisions, and provides solutions that meet these challenges.« less
  • Using the analytical capabilities that the Contract Mix Model presents, the utility can select from its menu of procurement options those alternatives that give it the flexibility to manage the particular set of risks about which it is most concerned. In other words, it can design a procurement strategy that is optimally suited to meet its risk management and operating cost objectives simultaneously. In long-run fuel procurement planning, the model gives the utility analytical capabilities it has not previously had available. It can assess the differential risks associated with different fuel contract mixes. It can assess the impacts of themore » selection of different contract mixes on expected fuel costs. It can assess the impacts of specific events on any of its contract procurement alternatives.« less
  • A nuclear power plant with a capital cost of $88 million and an annual operations and maintenance (O and M) cost of $3.2 million that is operated by a plant staff of 59 people The Ginna nuclear power plant was indeed such a plant in 1970, its first full year of operation. Today that same plant has a total invested capital cost of $400 million with an annual capital cost, including upgrade projects which are being amortized, of $37 million. The annual O and M expenditure is nearly $60 million, and the total staffing, both plant and corporate support, ismore » nearly 600 people. The result of this increased cost has been a dramatic narrowing of the cost margin between Ginna and coal units in the rochester Gas and Electric system. While increased expenditures have resulted in improved reliability and operability, and have increased the margins of safety, it is becoming necessary to implement cost monitoring and control measures so that each dollar spent provides maximum value. The factors which have contributed to the increased capital and O and M expenditures are well known. They include a broad range of safety, reliability, and operating projects and activities. Current upward pressures on cost include initiatives such as procurement control, procedure upgrades, configuration management, enhanced maintenance activities, and equipment replacements and upgrades.« less
  • Given current economic and regulatory challenges, utilities are facing the need to manage inventories more efficiently, lower spare parts costs, and reduce the downtime associated with equipment failure. Two programs helping utilities achieve these goals are the Joint Procurement Corporation (JPC) for multicompany purchase of common equipment and services and the pooled inventory management (PIM) program for joint purchase and storage of nuclear generating unit spare parts. Both of these are cooperative programs that decrease the probability of extended plant outages and reduce duplication of effort and/or inventory among participating utilities.