skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) Annual Review 2017


Annual review of the project progress.

; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Southern States Energy Board
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Clean Coal and Carbon (FE-20)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: 2017 Mastering the Subsurface Through Technology Innovation, Partnerships and Collaboration: Carbon Storage and Oil and Natural Gas Technologies Review Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA August 1, 2017
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Berry, Patricia, Ripepi, Nino, Knapp, James, and Pashin, Jack. Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) Annual Review 2017. United States: N. p., 2017. Web.
Berry, Patricia, Ripepi, Nino, Knapp, James, & Pashin, Jack. Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) Annual Review 2017. United States.
Berry, Patricia, Ripepi, Nino, Knapp, James, and Pashin, Jack. 2017. "Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) Annual Review 2017". United States. doi:.
title = {Southeast Offshore Storage Resource Assessment (SOSRA) Annual Review 2017},
author = {Berry, Patricia and Ripepi, Nino and Knapp, James and Pashin, Jack},
abstractNote = {Annual review of the project progress.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2017,
month = 8

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • Annual review presentation
  • Work at the Solar Energy Meteorological Research and Training Sites is reviewed. NOAA, SERI, and Canadian insolation assessment and research projects and projects by the national labs and contractors are discussed. (LEW)
  • In the last two decades the performance of numerical wind-wave models has improved considerably. Several models have been routinely producing since the mid 1980`s good quality wave estimates globally. The verifications of wind-wave models have mainly focused on the evaluation of the error of the significant wave height H{sub s} estimates. However for wave energy purposes the main parameters to be assessed are the wave power P{sub w} and the mean (energy) period T{sub e}. Since P{sub w} is proportional to H{sub s}{sup 2}T{sub e}, its expected error is much larger than for the single wave parameters. This paper summarizesmore » the intercomparison of two wind-wave models against buoy data in the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea to select the most suitable one for the construction of an Atlas of the wave energy resource in Europe. A full verification in the two basins of the selected model--the WAM model, implemented in the routine operation of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts--was then performed against buoy and satellite altimeter data. It was found that the WAM model accuracy is very good for offshore locations in the North Atlantic, but for the Mediterranean Sea the results are much less accurate probably due to a lower quality of the input wind fields.« less
  • This paper addresses the following key questions in the discussion on the integration of renewable energy resources in the Pacific Northwest power grid: a) what will be the future balancing requirement to accommodate a simulated expansion of wind energy resources from 3.3 GW in 2008 to 14.4 GW in 2019 in the Northwest Power Pool (NWPP), and b) what are the most cost effective technological solutions for meeting the balancing requirements in the Northwest Power Pool (NWPP). A life-cycle analysis was performed to assess the least-cost technology option for meeting the new balancing requirement. The technologies considered in this studymore » include conventional turbines (CT), sodium sulfur (NaS) batteries, lithium ion (Li-ion) batteries, pumped hydro energy storage (PH), and demand response (DR). Hybrid concepts that combine 2 or more of the technologies above are also evaluated. This analysis was performed with collaboration by the Bonneville Power Administration and funded by the Energy Storage Systems Program of the U.S. Department of Energy.« less