skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: NRC ARDC Guidance Support Status Report

Abstract

This report provides a summary that reflects the progress and status of proposed regulatory design criteria for advanced non-light water reactor (LWR) designs in accordance with the Level 3 milestone M3AT-17IN2001013 in work package AT-17IN200101. These criteria have been designated as advanced reactor design criteria (ARDC) and they provide guidance to future applicants for addressing the general design criteria (GDC) that are currently applied specifically to LWR designs. This report provides a summary of Phase 2 activities related to the various tasks associated with ARDC development and the subsequent development of ARDC regulatory guidance for sodium fast reactor (SFR) and modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) designs. Status Report Organization: Section 2 discusses the origin of the GDC and their application to LWRs. Section 3 addresses the objective of this initiative and how it benefits the advanced non-LWR reactor vendors. Section 4 discusses the scope and structure of the initiative. Section 5 provides background on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ARDC team’s original development of the proposed ARDC that were submitted to the NRC for consideration. Section 6 provides a summary of recent ARDC Phase 2 activities. Appendices A through E document the DOE ARDC team’s public comments on variousmore » sections of the NRC’s draft regulatory guide DG–1330, “Guidance for Developing Principal Design Criteria for Non-Light Water Reactors.”« less

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Idaho National Lab. (INL), Idaho Falls, ID (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE)
OSTI Identifier:
1376209
Report Number(s):
INL/EXT-17-42520
TRN: US1800550
DOE Contract Number:
AC07-05ID14517
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS; REACTOR DESIGN; HTGR TYPE REACTORS; FAST REACTORS; REGULATORY GUIDES; advanced reactor design criteria; general design criteria; high-temperature gas-cooled reactor

Citation Formats

Holbrook, Mark R. NRC ARDC Guidance Support Status Report. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.2172/1376209.
Holbrook, Mark R. NRC ARDC Guidance Support Status Report. United States. doi:10.2172/1376209.
Holbrook, Mark R. Sat . "NRC ARDC Guidance Support Status Report". United States. doi:10.2172/1376209. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1376209.
@article{osti_1376209,
title = {NRC ARDC Guidance Support Status Report},
author = {Holbrook, Mark R.},
abstractNote = {This report provides a summary that reflects the progress and status of proposed regulatory design criteria for advanced non-light water reactor (LWR) designs in accordance with the Level 3 milestone M3AT-17IN2001013 in work package AT-17IN200101. These criteria have been designated as advanced reactor design criteria (ARDC) and they provide guidance to future applicants for addressing the general design criteria (GDC) that are currently applied specifically to LWR designs. This report provides a summary of Phase 2 activities related to the various tasks associated with ARDC development and the subsequent development of ARDC regulatory guidance for sodium fast reactor (SFR) and modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR) designs. Status Report Organization: Section 2 discusses the origin of the GDC and their application to LWRs. Section 3 addresses the objective of this initiative and how it benefits the advanced non-LWR reactor vendors. Section 4 discusses the scope and structure of the initiative. Section 5 provides background on the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) ARDC team’s original development of the proposed ARDC that were submitted to the NRC for consideration. Section 6 provides a summary of recent ARDC Phase 2 activities. Appendices A through E document the DOE ARDC team’s public comments on various sections of the NRC’s draft regulatory guide DG–1330, “Guidance for Developing Principal Design Criteria for Non-Light Water Reactors.”},
doi = {10.2172/1376209},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) reviews and evaluates the human factors engineering (HFE) programs of applicants for nuclear power plant construction permits, operating licenses, standard design certifications, and combined operating licenses. The purpose of these safety reviews is to help ensure that personnel performance and reliability are appropriately supported. Detailed design review procedures and guidance for the evaluations is provided in three key documents: the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800), the HFE Program Review Model (NUREG-0711), and the Human-System Interface Design Review Guidelines (NUREG-0700). These documents were last revised in 2007, 2004 and 2002, respectively. The NRC is committed tomore » the periodic update and improvement of these guidance documents to ensure that they remain state-of-the-art design evaluation tools. Thus, the NRC has initiated a project with BNL to update the NRC guidance to remain current with recent research on human performance, advances in HFE methods and tools, and new technology. INL supported Brookhaven National Lab (BNL) to update the detailed HFE review criteria contained in NUREG-0711 and NUREG-0700 based on (1) feedback obtained from end users, (2) the results of NRC research and development efforts supporting the NRC staff’s HFE safety reviews, and (3) other material the project staff identify as applicable to the update effort. INL submitted comments on development plans and sections of NUREGs 0800, 0711, and 0700. The contractor prepared the report attached here as the deliverable for this work.« less
  • This report defines the scope, application, and limits of the technical cooperation the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) would provide, upon request, to a foreign regulatory agency in a nuclear emergency. It outlines the basis for such cooperation, offers a model written agreement, and describes recent cases of NRC assistance. It also identifies non-NRC sources of emergency advisory assistance available to foreign organizations.
  • As with other licensing decisions, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission`s (NRC`s) decision to grant or deny a license for a proposed repository at Yucca Mountain will be based on a combination of fact and judgment as set forth by the Department of Energy (DOE) in a license application. Subjective judgments of individual experts and, in some cases, groups of experts will be used by DOE to interpret data obtained during site characterization and to address the many technical issues and inherent uncertainties associated with predicting repository performance for thousands of years. The NRC has traditionally accepted expert judgment to evaluatemore » and interpret the facts which support a license application. Recently, the Performance Assessment and High-level Waste Integration Branch of the NRC has developed regulatory guidance in the form of a draft branch technical position (BTP) that identifies circumstances which may warrant the use of a formal process for obtaining the judgments of more than one expert (i.e. expert elicitation) and describes acceptable procedures for conducting such expert elicitations.« less
  • A scenario guidance handbook was prepared to assist emergency planners in developing scenarios for emergency preparedness exercises at nuclear power plants. The handbook provides guidance for the development of the objectives of an exercise, the descriptions of scenario events and responses, and the instructions to the participants. Information concerning implementation of the scenario, critiques and findings, and generation and format of scenario data are also included. Finally, examples of manual calculational techniques for producing radiological data are included as an appendix.
  • This is 1 of 15 documents designed to illustrate how an Environmental, Safety and Health (ES and H) Assurance Program may be implemented. The generic definition of ES and H Assurance Programs is given in a companion document entitled An Environmental, Safety and Health Assurance Program Standard. Since the quality of material, equipment, or facilities affects the realization of hazard consequences, this document provides guidance for using the traditional Quality Assurance Program as one aspect of the ES and H Assurance Program. An assurance program is essentially a management system which consists of a control subprogram and a verification subprogram.more » The control subprogram includes: identification of primary objective(s); analysis of the primary objective(s) to obtain subpart(s) and identify the factors which determine the subpart(s); determination of controls for these factors; establishment of a system for implementing these controls; and implementation of the system. The verification subprogram involves the review, audit, test, and measurement functions which ensure that the control subprogram is adequate and used. In ES and HA Programs, the control over the hardware (facilities, material, and equipment) risk factors is to a large extent identical to the control exercised by a QA program. To avoid duplication of effort, it is recommended that control in this area be systematically delegated to the QA program with appropriate coordination by the ES and H Staff. The description of a QA program presented in this guideline document is intended to facilitate such a cooperative endeavor.« less