skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Authenticating Treaty Processor Systems: An Evaluation Framework.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
; ;  [1];  [1]
  1. (AWE)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1374791
Report Number(s):
SAND2016-7628C
646433
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the 57th INMM Annual Meeting held July 24-28, 2016 in Atlanta, GA.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Brotz, Jay Kristoffer, Hymel, Ross W, Neil Grant, and Neil Evans. Authenticating Treaty Processor Systems: An Evaluation Framework.. United States: N. p., 2016. Web.
Brotz, Jay Kristoffer, Hymel, Ross W, Neil Grant, & Neil Evans. Authenticating Treaty Processor Systems: An Evaluation Framework.. United States.
Brotz, Jay Kristoffer, Hymel, Ross W, Neil Grant, and Neil Evans. 2016. "Authenticating Treaty Processor Systems: An Evaluation Framework.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1374791.
@article{osti_1374791,
title = {Authenticating Treaty Processor Systems: An Evaluation Framework.},
author = {Brotz, Jay Kristoffer and Hymel, Ross W and Neil Grant and Neil Evans},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2016,
month = 8
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • This report describes an analytic framework for evaluating the capabilities of seismic systems for verifying future treaties limiting nuclear weapons tests. The framework, which is based on decision analysis, is intended to assist policy makers in formulating and evaluating political decisions and research alternatives related to seismic verification. An illustrative evaluation is provided for two types of seismic systems, which are part of an in-country Regional Seismic Verification System. The evaluation incorporates a variety of issues, including detection capabilities, evasion possibilities, evidence produced by the systems, US response to the evidence, and relative values of possible outcomes to the USmore » and foreign countries. Methods are provided to quantify the effectiveness of the systems in assuring treaty compliance and deterring violations. The primary advantages of the framework are that it provides a systematic method for examining technical issues, incorporating value and cost tradeoffs, and analyzing alternate judgments. The framework is being refined to incorporate, for example, the role of on-site inspections and information provided by other sources that supplements seismic evidence. Applications of the framework to decisions related to treaty negotiations are being explored.« less
  • The success of Advanced Traveler Information 5ystems (ATIS) and Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS) depends on the availability and dissemination of timely and accurate estimates of current and emerging traffic network conditions. Real-time Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) systems are being developed to provide the required timely information. The DTA systems will provide faithful and coherent real-time, pre-trip, and en-route guidance/information which includes routing, mode, and departure time suggestions for use by travelers, ATIS, and ATMS. To ensure the credibility and deployment potential of such DTA systems, an evaluation system supporting all phases of DTA system development has been designed andmore » presented in this paper. This evaluation system is called the DTA System Laboratory (DSL). A major component of the DSL is a ground- truth simulator, the DTA Evaluation System (DES). The DES is envisioned to be a virtual representation of a transportation system in which ATMS and ATIS technologies are deployed. It simulates the driving and decision-making behavior of travelers in response to ATIS and ATMS guidance, information, and control. This paper presents the major evaluation requirements for a DTA Systems, a modular modeling framework for the DES, and a distributed DES design. The modeling framework for the DES is modular, meets the requirements, can be assembled using both legacy and independently developed modules, and can be implemented as a either a single process or a distributed system. The distributed design is extendible, provides for the optimization of distributed performance, and object-oriented design within each distributed component. A status report on the development of the DES and other research applications is also provided.« less
  • The Used Fuel Disposition (UFD) Campaign within DOE-NE is evaluating storage and disposal options for a range of waste forms and a range of geologic environments. For each waste form and geologic environment combination, there are multiple options for repository conceptual design. The Disposal Systems Evaluation Framework (DSEF) is being developed to formalize the development and documentation of options for each waste form and environment combination. The DSEF is being implemented in two parts. One part is an Excel workbook with multiple sheets. This workbook is designed to be user friendly, such that anyone within the UFD Campaign can usemore » it as a guide to develop and document repository conceptual designs that respect thermal, geometric, and other constraints. The other part is an Access relational database file that will be centrally maintained to document the ensemble of conceptual designs developed with individual implementations of the Excel workbook. The DSEF Excel workbook includes sheets for waste form, environment, geometric constraints, engineered barrier system (EBS) design, thermal, performance assessment (PA), materials, cost, and fuel cycle system impacts. Each of these sheets guides the user through the process of developing internally consistent design options, and documenting the thought process. The sheets interact with each other to transfer information and identify inconsistencies to the user. In some cases, the sheets are stand-alone, and in other cases (such as PA), the sheets refer the user to another tool, with the user being responsible to transfer summary results into the DSEF sheet. Finally, the DSEF includes three top-level sheets: inputs & results, interface parameters, and knowledge management (references). These sheets enable users and reviewers to see the overall picture on only a few summary sheets, while developing the design option systematically using the detailed sheets. The DSEF Access relational database file collects the key inputs, results, and interface parameters from each Excel workbook implementation. The power of a relational database is available to sort and organize groups of designs, and to answer queries about what evaluations have been done in the UFD Campaign.« less