skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change

ORCiD logo [1];  [2]
  1. Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford MA 02155 USA, Arnold Arboretum of Harvard University, Boston MA 02131 USA
  2. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98105 USA
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Grant/Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Global Change Biology
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 23; Journal Issue: 9; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2017-10-20 17:23:03; Journal ID: ISSN 1354-1013
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom

Citation Formats

Ettinger, Ailene, and HilleRisLambers, Janneke. Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change. United Kingdom: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1111/gcb.13649.
Ettinger, Ailene, & HilleRisLambers, Janneke. Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change. United Kingdom. doi:10.1111/gcb.13649.
Ettinger, Ailene, and HilleRisLambers, Janneke. Sat . "Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change". United Kingdom. doi:10.1111/gcb.13649.
title = {Competition and facilitation may lead to asymmetric range shift dynamics with climate change},
author = {Ettinger, Ailene and HilleRisLambers, Janneke},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1111/gcb.13649},
journal = {Global Change Biology},
number = 9,
volume = 23,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = {Sat Feb 04 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Sat Feb 04 00:00:00 EST 2017}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record at 10.1111/gcb.13649

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:
  • Tests will begin in September on a gas-fired heat pump that is expected to cost 30 to 50 percent more than a comparable electric unit but operate at only one-third the cost, with a pay-back period of as low as two years. The heat pump uses a steam driven single-wheel turbine to drive a fluorocarbon vapor compressor. Double circuit heat exchangers are used to hold down the source-to-sink temperature ratios. Mechanical Technology, Inc. is developing the heat pump at a cost of $1.2 million, 50 percent of which is funded by ERDA. Comparisons of energy prices of gas and electricitymore » and annual operating costs of gas and electric heat pumps illustrate the potential savings with the gas-fired units, which are less sensitive to fluctuations in demand relative to capacity. Industrial and commercial markets will be developed before the heat pump is made available for residential use. (DCK)« less
  • This paper considers the effect of several key parameters of low carbon energy technologies on the cost of abatement. A methodology for determining the minimum level of performance required for a parameter to have a statistically significant impact on CO2 abatement cost is developed and used to evaluate the impact of eight key parameters of low carbon energy supply technologies on the cost of CO2 abatement. The capital cost of nuclear technology is found to have the greatest impact of the parameters studied. The cost of biomass and CCS technologies also have impacts, while their efficiencies have little, if any.more » Sensitivity analysis of the results with respect to population, GDP, and CO2 emission constraint show that the minimum performance level and impact of nuclear technologies is consistent across the socioeconomic scenarios studied, while the other technology parameters show different performance under higher population, lower GDP scenarios. Solar technology was found to have a small impact, and then only at very low costs. These results indicate that the cost of nuclear is the single most important driver of abatement cost, and that trading efficiency for cost may make biomass and CCS technologies more competitive.« less
  • It has been hypothesized that plants are increasingly shade intolerant in drier conditions. Although many field patterns can be understood from this theory, the conspicuous {open_quotes}nurse plant{close_quotes} phenomenon in dry areas seems to contradict the theory. We derive a graphical model to illustrate how the interplay of facilitation and competition can be understood from two ingredients: the plant responses to the combined effects of light and water, and the effect of plant canopies on microsite light and water. We show that in drier conditions the light compensation point (i.e., photosynthesis equals respiration) is higher. However, at very high light levels,more » growth is suppressed due to low moisture conditions. Under dry, high light conditions facilitative effects dominate, whereas competitive effects dominate on the wet part of the gradient.« less
  • Cited by 10
  • A simulation model was used to reproduce wet/dry cycles over a 32 year period (1961-92) and to examine potential changes in wetland hydrology and vegetation due to a changing climate in one semi-permanent wetland (P1) at the Cottonwood Lake area, ND. The model included a hydrology component that calculated monthly changes in water storage based on precipitation, ET, snowpack, and surface and subsurface recharge from adjacent uplands. A spatially-explicit vegetation component calculated monthly cover changes depending on water depth, seasonality, and existing cover type. Simulated water levels compared favorably with actual water levels. Four known dry periods and one wetmore » period were reproduced. One simulated dry period in the early 1980`s did not actually occur. Changes in cover were realistic except for years when simulated water levels were significantly different than actual levels. Following model evaluation under the current climate, a GCM-based climate change scenario was imposed on wetland long-term dynamics. Projected temperature and precipitation changes from the GISS climate model (2xCO{sub 2}) were used. Wetland dynamics changed considerably under this scenario with lower water levels, more frequent drying, increased emergent cover, and loss of open water areas.« less