skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: What we?ve been doing with the 3D SLDV.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1373232
Report Number(s):
SAND2016-7037C
646114
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the Ad Hoc University Collaborations U Massachusetts and U Wisconsin held July 19-27, 2016 in Albuquerque, NM.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Rohe, Daniel Peter. What we?ve been doing with the 3D SLDV.. United States: N. p., 2016. Web.
Rohe, Daniel Peter. What we?ve been doing with the 3D SLDV.. United States.
Rohe, Daniel Peter. 2016. "What we?ve been doing with the 3D SLDV.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1373232.
@article{osti_1373232,
title = {What we?ve been doing with the 3D SLDV.},
author = {Rohe, Daniel Peter},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2016,
month = 7
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • Jim Knight of Roche Diagnostics discusses Roche's projects.
  • Electromagnetic fields penetrate only a distance of {approx} 60 nm into the surface of a superconductor such as niobium. Therefore it is obvious that the condition of a cavity surface will affect the performance of this cavity. In at least the last 30 years niobium surfaces as used in superconducting accelerating cavities have been investigated by surface characterization techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Auger spectroscopy (AES), X-ray photon spectroscopy (XPS), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The objective of all these investigations was to establish correlations betweenmore » surface conditions and cavity performances such as surface resistance and accelerating gradients. Much emphasis was placed on investigating surface topography and the oxidation states of niobium under varying conditions such as buffered chemical polishing, electropolishing, oxipolishing, high temperature heat treatment, post-purification heat treatment and in-situ baking. Additional measurements were conducted to characterize the behavior of a niobium surface more relevant to rf cavities such as resonant (multipacting) and non-resonant (field emission) electron loading. A large amount of knowledge has been extracted by all these investigations; nevertheless, there is still a lack of reproducibility in cavity performance when applying the ''best'' process to a cavity surface and no clear correlation has been established between niobium surface features and cavity performance. This contribution gives a review of the attempts to characterize niobium surfaces over the last three decades and tries to extract the ''white spots'' in our knowledge.« less
  • Developing scientifically defensible quantitative estimates of the uncertainty of atmospheric emissions inventories has been a ''gleam in researchers' eyes'' since atmospheric chemical transport and transformation models (CTMs) started to be used to study ''air pollution''. Originally, the compilation of these inventories was done as part of the development and application of the models by researchers whose expertise usually did not include the ''art'' of emissions estimations. In general, the smaller the effort spent on compiling the inventories the more effort could be placed on the model development, application and analysis. Yet model results are intimately tied to the accuracy ofmore » the emissions data; no model, however accurately the atmospheric physical and chemical processes are represented, will give reliable representation of air concentrations if the emissions data are flawed.« less