skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap.

Abstract

Foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1367188
Report Number(s):
SAND-2017-5140R
653319
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
25 ENERGY STORAGE

Citation Formats

Ferreira, Summer Rhodes, Conover, David, Muna, Alice Baca, LaFleur, Chris Bensdotter, Cole, Pam, and Rosewater, David Martin. DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap.. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.2172/1367188.
Ferreira, Summer Rhodes, Conover, David, Muna, Alice Baca, LaFleur, Chris Bensdotter, Cole, Pam, & Rosewater, David Martin. DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap.. United States. doi:10.2172/1367188.
Ferreira, Summer Rhodes, Conover, David, Muna, Alice Baca, LaFleur, Chris Bensdotter, Cole, Pam, and Rosewater, David Martin. 2017. "DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap.". United States. doi:10.2172/1367188. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1367188.
@article{osti_1367188,
title = {DOE OE Energy Storage Systems Safety Roadmap.},
author = {Ferreira, Summer Rhodes and Conover, David and Muna, Alice Baca and LaFleur, Chris Bensdotter and Cole, Pam and Rosewater, David Martin},
abstractNote = {Foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems.},
doi = {10.2172/1367188},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2017,
month = 5
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The goal of the DOE OE ESS Safety Roadmap is to foster confidence in the safety and reliability of energy storage systems.
  • This U.S. DRIVE electrochemical energy storage roadmap describes ongoing and planned efforts to develop electrochemical energy storage technologies for plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). The Energy Storage activity comprises a number of research areas (including advanced materials research, cell level research, battery development, and enabling R&D which includes analysis, testing and other activities) for advanced energy storage technologies (batteries and ultra-capacitors).
  • The safety aspects of thermal energy storage at high temperatures in fluoride mixtures were studied. An experimental thermal energy storage unit is described briefly, and the prevention of corrosion of the stainless steel container by doping the fluorides with aluminum is discussed. Experiments that illustrate the fire hazard of molten fluorides are described. No chemical reactions with various materials, including materials to extinguish fires, were observed. The fluoride mixture was found to dissolve in water at a rate of 2.6 g/100 ml of water which is less than the 4 g/100 ml of water for pure NaF. In addition, specimensmore » were ruptured to simulate the situation in the case of residential home heating and automotive propulsion. In the first case only fluorides were used. In the second case fluorides and sodium were combined, the latter simulating the heat pipe. It was found that sodium has to be contained safely, whereas the fluorides are very stable and do not react with insulation material. No spreading of the liquid fluorides can occur since they freeze very rapidly.« less
  • Battery energy storage systems store off-peak energy from electric power plants for use at time-of-peak energy demand. This study provides generic environmental assessments of five battery energy storage systems: lead acid, zinc chloride, zinc bromine, sodium sulfur, and lithium-metal sulfide. No significant environmental effects are associated with the normal operation of the five battery energy storage systems. Potential effects, such as accidents or disposal of hazardous wastes, affect the acceptance of these technologies. The availability of raw materials - such as lead, calcium, aluminum, and lithium - may affect the large-scale manufacturing of battery energy storage systems. Existing manufacturing capacitymore » and ability to expand may also affect the potential for their increased use.« less
  • The environmental, safety, and social impacts of two mechanical storage systems, underground pumped hydro (UPH) and compressed air energy storage (CAES) are similar to those of existing peaking power plants. These impacts, with engineering factors, form a methodology for selecting sites for these two systems. Application of this methodology to a hypothetical case indicates that, although design alternatives which mitigate adverse environmental impacts are recommended, site selection effectively limits the environmental effect of CAES or UPH plants. Public perception of CAES and UPH energy storage facilities should generally be positive, provided that those affected are informed and allowed to participatemore » in the siting process.« less