skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Understanding How Climate Engineering Can Offset Climate Change

Abstract

Sixth Meeting of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project; Oslo, Norway, 21–22 June 2016

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1361972
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-119170
Journal ID: ISSN 2324-9250; EOSTAJ
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union (Online)
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Citation Formats

Kravitz, Ben, Robock, Alan, and Kristjánsson, Jón. Understanding How Climate Engineering Can Offset Climate Change. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.1029/2016EO005279.
Kravitz, Ben, Robock, Alan, & Kristjánsson, Jón. Understanding How Climate Engineering Can Offset Climate Change. United States. doi:10.1029/2016EO005279.
Kravitz, Ben, Robock, Alan, and Kristjánsson, Jón. Thu . "Understanding How Climate Engineering Can Offset Climate Change". United States. doi:10.1029/2016EO005279.
@article{osti_1361972,
title = {Understanding How Climate Engineering Can Offset Climate Change},
author = {Kravitz, Ben and Robock, Alan and Kristjánsson, Jón},
abstractNote = {Sixth Meeting of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project; Oslo, Norway, 21–22 June 2016},
doi = {10.1029/2016EO005279},
journal = {Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union (Online)},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jan 12 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Thu Jan 12 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}
  • Major changes in the global climate are virtually certain by the mid-21st century due to the carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Researchers are beginning to explore ways we can adopt. Scientist have long known that human activities, particularly the burning of fossil fuels, are artificially increasing the volume of greenhouse gases in the earth's atmosphere. This increase will eventually make the planet the hottest it has been in history. What remains controversial about the greenhouse effect is the rate of this global warming, its regional distribution, and most of all, what to do about the problem.
  • We know that global climate change threatens the sustainability of agriculture and agroforestry worldwide through increased heat, drought, surface evaporation and associated soil drying. Exposure of crops and forests to warmer and drier environments will increase leaf:air water vapour–pressure deficits (VPD), and will result in increased drought susceptibility and reduced productivity, not only in arid regions but also in tropical regions with seasonal dry periods. Fast-growing, short-rotation forestry (SRF) bioenergy crops such as poplar (Populus spp.) and willow (Salix spp.) are particularly susceptible to hydraulic failure following drought stress due to their isohydric nature and relatively high stomatal conductance. Onemore » approach to sustaining plant productivity is to improve water-use efficiency (WUE) by engineering crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) into C3 crops. CAM improves WUE by shifting stomatal opening and primary CO 2 uptake and fixation to the night-time when leaf:air VPD is low. CAMmembers of the tree genus Clusia exemplify the compatibility of CAM performance within tree species and highlight CAM as a mechanism to conserve water and maintain carbon uptake during drought conditions. Moreover, the introduction of bioengineered CAM into SRF bioenergy trees is a potentially viable path to sustaining agroforestry production systems in the face of a globally changing climate.« less
  • Successful in situ biodegradation must depend on microbial catalysis as well as physical transport. While there has been much effort directed toward understanding vadose zone transport processes, our understanding of the microbial ecology of the indigenous catalysts limits our ability to manage biodegradation processes in soil. The environmental factors commonly listed as controlling in situ biodegradation are water, oxygen, redox potential, nutrients, pH, and temperature. Simplistic statements concerning the environmental determinants of in situ biodegradation may reflect a naive understanding of microbial ecology and may in fact direct management efforts in inappropriate directions. We discuss what we need to knowmore » about soil microbial ecology to elevate in situ biodegradation to a reliable and well-understood remediation option. We need to know the following: What controls the presence of the desired metabolic capability; the distribution of degrading communities relative to contaminant source; and what controls activities of relevant communities? 45 refs., 7 figs., 1 tab.« less
  • If the increase in combustion of fossil fuels continues to grow, the atmospheric CO/sub 2/ concentration could double in 60 yrs, resulting in an increase in global temperature. The Oak Ridge study group is concerned with the need to predict more accurately the climatic effects of increasing atmospheric CO/sub 2/ and the need to learn more about the carbon cycle. With increased temperature, rates of plant respiration and decay could exceed photosynthesis resulting in release of additional CO/sub 2/. Other adverse impacts of a warming trend are listed. The following remedial measures are suggested: reduction of coal combustion by increasingmore » energy conservation, and establishment of a worldwide food reserve in the event of a decline in agricultural production. There has been a cooling trend in the earth's surface temperature in recent years. Opposing influences on climate may have been cancelling each other's effects, giving rise to a controversy over whether the net effects of man's future activities will be a cooling or warming trend. (HLW)« less