On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques
In this paper, we establish the equivalence of the various techniques for measuring B(E2) values using a statistical analysis. Data used in this work come from the recent compilation by B. Pritychenko et al. (2016). We consider only those nuclei for which the B(E2) values were measured by at least two different methods, with each method being independently performed at least twice. Our results indicate that most prevalent methods of measuring B(E2) values are equivalent, with some weak evidence that Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) measurements may differ from Coulomb excitation (CE) and nuclear resonance fluorescence (NRF) measurements. However, such an evidence appears to arise from discrepant DSAM measurements of the lifetimes for 60Ni and some Sn nuclei rather than a systematic deviation in the method itself.
- Research Organization:
- Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- SC0012704; AC02-98CH10886
- OSTI ID:
- 1336052
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 1359700
- Report Number(s):
- BNL-112371-2016-JA
- Journal Information:
- Nuclear Physics. A, Vol. 955; ISSN 0375-9474
- Publisher:
- ElsevierCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Web of Science
Similar Records
Experimental g factors and B(E2) values of 2{sub 1}{sup +},4{sub 1}{sup +},2{sub 2}{sup +}, and 3{sub 1}{sup -} states in {sup 64}Zn and {sup 68}Zn compared to shell model predictions
High-precision B(E2) measurements of semi-magic 58,60,62,64Ni by Coulomb excitation