skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Changes in Cleanup Strategies and Long-Term Monitoring Costs for DOE FUSRAP Sites-17241


LM is preparing for the transfer of 11 new FUSRAP sites within the next 10 years from USACE, many of which will have substantially greater LTSM requirements than the current Completed sites. LM is analyzing the estimates for the level of effort required to monitor the new sites in order to make more customized and accurate predictions of future life cycle costs and environmental liabilities of these sites.

 [1];  [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Legacy Management
  2. Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. Weldon Spring, MO
  3. Navarro Research and Engineering, Inc. Baltimore, MD
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
US Department of Energy/Office of Legacy Management
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Legacy Management (LM), Office of Site Operations (LM-20)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: 2017 Waste Management Conference, Phoenix, AZ March 5, 2017
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Castillo, Darina, Carpenter, Cliff, Roberts, Rebecca, and Young, Carl. Changes in Cleanup Strategies and Long-Term Monitoring Costs for DOE FUSRAP Sites-17241. United States: N. p., 2017. Web.
Castillo, Darina, Carpenter, Cliff, Roberts, Rebecca, & Young, Carl. Changes in Cleanup Strategies and Long-Term Monitoring Costs for DOE FUSRAP Sites-17241. United States.
Castillo, Darina, Carpenter, Cliff, Roberts, Rebecca, and Young, Carl. Sun . "Changes in Cleanup Strategies and Long-Term Monitoring Costs for DOE FUSRAP Sites-17241". United States. doi:.
title = {Changes in Cleanup Strategies and Long-Term Monitoring Costs for DOE FUSRAP Sites-17241},
author = {Castillo, Darina and Carpenter, Cliff and Roberts, Rebecca and Young, Carl},
abstractNote = {LM is preparing for the transfer of 11 new FUSRAP sites within the next 10 years from USACE, many of which will have substantially greater LTSM requirements than the current Completed sites. LM is analyzing the estimates for the level of effort required to monitor the new sites in order to make more customized and accurate predictions of future life cycle costs and environmental liabilities of these sites.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Mar 05 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Sun Mar 05 00:00:00 EST 2017}

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • A major issue facing many government and private industry sites that were previously contaminated with radioactive and chemical wastes is that often the sites cannot be cleaned up enough to permit unrestricted human access. These sites will require long-term management, in some cases indefinitely, leaving site owners with the challenge of protecting human health and environmental quality in a cost effective manner. Long-term monitoring of groundwater contamination is one of the largest projected costs in the life cycle of environmental management at the Savannah River Site (SRS), the larger DOE complex, and many large federal and private sites. Currently, mostmore » monitoring strategies are focused on laboratory measurements of contaminants measured in groundwater samples collected from wells. This approach is expensive, and provides limited and lagging information about the effectiveness of cleanup activities and the behavior of the residual contamination. Over the last twenty years, DOE and other federal agencies have made significant investments in the development of various types of sensors and strategies that would allow for remote analysis of contaminants in groundwater, but these approaches do not promise significant reductions in risk or cost. Scientists at SRS have developed a new paradigm to simultaneously improve the performance of long term monitoring systems while lowering the overall cost of monitoring. This alternative approach incorporates traditional point measurements of contaminant concentration with measurements of controlling variables including boundary conditions, master variables, and traditional plume/contaminant variables. Boundary conditions are the overall driving forces that control plume movement and therefore provide leading indication to changes in plume stability. These variables include metrics associated with meteorology, hydrology, hydrogeology, and land use. Master variables are the key variables that control the chemistry of the groundwater system, and include redox variables (ORP, DO, chemicals), pH, specific conductivity, biological community (breakdown/decay products), and temperature. A robust suite of relatively inexpensive tools is commercially available to measure these variables. Traditional plume/contaminant variables are various measures of contaminant concentration including traditional analysis of chemicals in groundwater samples. An innovative long term monitoring strategy has been developed for acidic or caustic groundwater plumes contaminated with metals and/or radionuclides. Not only should the proposed strategy be more effective at early identification of potential risks, this strategy should be significantly more cost effective because measurement of controlling boundary conditions and master variables is relatively simple. These variables also directly reflect the evolution of the plume through time, so that the monitoring strategy can be modified as the plume 'ages'. This transformational long-term monitoring paradigm will generate significant cost savings to DOE, other federal agencies and industry and will provide improved performance and leading indicators of environmental management performance. (authors)« less
  • Non-Federally owned radioactively contaminated sites in St. Louis, Missouri are currently being remediated by the St. Louis District Corps of Engineers under the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP). When FUSRAP remediation is complete, inaccessible soils which have levels of contamination greater than unrestricted use standards, will remain. The purpose of this paper is to document the initial challenges facing the project team during its development of the Long Term Stewardship plan for the management of these soils. These soils are located under buildings, roads, railroads and bridges. The Long Term Stewardship plan for the majority of the sitesmore » is being developed simultaneously with the remedy selection process. A living document, it will ultimately document the remedial action end state and location of inaccessible soils and implement the plan for ensuring these soils are not a threat to human health and the environment. Although these soils are protective in their current configuration, at some point in time, when activities such as maintenance, utility or property improvement occur, the soils will become accessible and need to be addressed by the federal government. Up until that point in time they will need to be effectively managed to ensure they remain protective. The St. Louis District is in the process of collaboratively developing this plan with its regulators, affected stakeholders and interested parties.« less
  • It will take up to 75 years and between $230 billion and $350 billion to clean up the Department of Energy`s former weapons productions facilities, according to the 1995 Baseline Environmental Management Report, issued on April 3, 1995. Thomas Grumbly, assistant secretary for environmental management, said that this is the most reliable estimate to date. Other estimates made in the past for the amount of time the cleanup would take were 30 years (the very rough estimate of former Environmental Restoration and Waste Management head Leo Duffy), and 50 years, an estimate mentioned last November during the American Nuclear Society`smore » Winter Meeting by a DOE representative. Most of the cleanup costs would be expended over a 40-year period, but work at some sites would continue until 2070. Approximately 70 percent of the cleanup costs would go to clean up five sites; Hanford and Savannah River, 21 percent each; Rocky Flats, 10 percent; Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 10 percent; and the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, 5 percent. The cost estimates are higher than the DOE`s proposed budget for cleanup and environmental restoration, which has been around $6 billion a year. Nor do they include remediation of sites for which no viable cleanup technology exists (the Nevada Test Site and the U.S. Navy`s nuclear propulsion facilities) or those plants that are still producing or disassembling nuclear weapons parts (such as the Pantex facility, near Amarillo, Tex.). Expenditures already made during the first five years of the cleanup program, estimated at $23 billion, are also not included in the new cost estimates. The DOE estimates that the total amount of radioactive waste that will result from the cleanup and requiring disposal will be around 33 million yd{sup 3}.« less
  • The US Department of Energy (DOE) expects to receive the transfer of 10 FUSRAP Sites from the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) over the next 10 years; however, the timing of the transfers is highly dependent upon federal funding of the ongoing remedial actions. When remediation for each site is complete and the 2-year operations and maintenance period has concluded, each site will transfer from USACE to DOE for long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M). US DOE’s Office of Legacy Management (LM) will accept program responsibility for these sites and conduct LTS&M activities required to maintain protectiveness, preserve site-specific knowledge,more » and retain the cleanup and stewardship records while keeping stakeholders informed. Since the last FUSRAP site transfer occurred in 2007, LM in coordination with USACE intends to establish a transition process to promote the seamless transfer of sites from the time when the first record of decision is signed to the completion of FUSRAP activities. The approach to transfer active FUSRAP sites to completed sites status has been historically outlined in foundational documents such as the 1999 Memorandum of Understanding and supporting letters of agreement between the two agencies. As more complex FUSRAP sites are completed, this transition process will provide a model between the two agencies to communicate future long-term care liabilities. Ultimately, the FUSRAP transition process is structured to acquire and preserve site knowledge and information necessary for protecting the environment and public health. As of 2015, LM has transitioned and accepted programmatic responsibility for over 90 sites. From LM’s perspective, successful transition of any site includes understanding the long-term environmental liabilities. LM uses site transition framework requirements from past transitions to develop site-specific transition plans. Site-specific transition plans are developed by LM in coordination with USACE and executed during the 2-year operations and maintenance period. An integrated project team of subject matter experts is assembled to address the conditions of the transitioning site; acquire a site records collection; evaluate site operations and final site conditions and associated risks; identify and contact stakeholders; and document the basis for site LTS&M requirements. While the majority of the transition activities are completed by LM, close coordination between US DOE LM and USACE throughout this process is essential for an effective and seamless transfer to assure that there is no lapse in site protectiveness.« less
  • The overall objective of this research is to understand the biogeochemical cycling of Pu in environments of interest to long-term DOE stewardship issues. Central to Pu cycling (transport initiation and immobilization) is the role of microorganisms. The hypothesis underlying this work is that microbial activity is the causative agent in initiating the mobilization of Pu in near-surface environments: through the transformation of Pu associated with solid phases, production of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) carrier phases and the creation of microenvironments. Also, microbial processes are central to the immobilization of Pu species, through the metabolism of organically complexed Pu species andmore » Pu associated with extracellular carrier phases and the creation of environments favorable for Pu transport retardation.« less