skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Comparing projections of industrial energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions in long-term energy models

Journal Article · · Energy
 [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [2];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [5];  [6];  [7];  [1]
  1. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), Haag (The Netherlands); Univ. of Utrecht (Netherlands). Copernicus Inst. of Sustainable Development
  2. Univ. of Utrecht (Netherlands). Copernicus Inst. of Sustainable Development
  3. International Center for Research on Environment and Development (CIRED), Nogent-sur-Marne (France)
  4. Univ. College London (UCL), London (United Kingdom). Energy Inst.
  5. National Inst. for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba (Japan). Center for Social and Environmental Systems Research
  6. Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL) and Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD (United States). Joint Global Change Research Inst.
  7. Research Inst. of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE), Kyoto (Japan)

The industry sector consumes more energy and emits more greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions than any other end-use sector. Integrated assessment models (IAMs) and energy system models have been widely used to evaluate climate policy at a global level, and include a representation of industrial energy use. In this study, the projected industrial energy use and accompanying GHG emissions, as well as the model structure of multiple long-term energy models are compared. The models show varying degrees to which energy consumption is decoupled from GDP growth in the future. In all models, the sector remains mostly (>50%) reliant on fossil energy through 2100 in a reference scenario (i.e., absent emissions mitigation policies), though there is significant divergence in the projected ability to switch to alternative fuels to mitigate GHG emissions. Among the set analyzed here, the more technologically detailed models tend to have less capacity for switching from fossil fuels to electricity. This highlights the importance of understanding of economy-wide mitigation responses and costs as an area for future improvement. Analyzing industry subsector material and energy use details can improve the ability to interpret results, and provide insight in feasibility of how emissions reduction can be achieved.

Research Organization:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE; European Union (EU)
Grant/Contract Number:
AC05-76RL01830; 308329; 2-1402
OSTI ID:
1353317
Report Number(s):
PNNL-SA-113207; KP1703030
Journal Information:
Energy, Vol. 122; ISSN 0360-5442
Publisher:
ElsevierCopyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 54 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (15)

Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation journal September 2013
Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: Energy intensity versus product mix journal July 2007
A short note on integrated assessment modeling approaches: Rejoinder to the review of “Making or breaking climate targets — The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy” journal October 2015
A Cross-Model Comparison of Global Long-Term Technology Diffusion Under a 2°c Climate Change Control Target journal November 2013
The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies journal January 2014
The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: Results from the Asia modeling exercise journal December 2012
The economics of mitigating climate change: What can we know? journal February 2015
Climate impact of transportation A model comparison journal January 2013
A MULTI-MODEL ANALYSIS OF THE REGIONAL AND SECTORAL ROLES OF BIOENERGY IN NEAR- AND LONG-TERM CO 2 EMISSIONS REDUCTION journal November 2013
Synergy of air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions of Chinese industries: A critical assessment of energy models journal December 2015
Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey journal December 2002
Material efficiency: A white paper journal January 2011
Projection of Cement Demand and Analysis of the Impacts of Carbon Tax on Cement Industry in China journal August 2015
Potential energy savings and CO2 emissions reduction of China's cement industry journal June 2012
Energy efficiency improvement potentials and a low energy demand scenario for the global industrial sector journal June 2014

Cited By (7)

Current status and future forecasting of biofuels technology development
  • Dehghani Madvar, Mohammad; Aslani, Alireza; Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
  • International Journal of Energy Research, Vol. 43, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4344
journal January 2019
Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 °C pathways journal June 2018
Assessment of long-term sustainable end-use energy demand in Romania journal December 2017
Recalibrating climate prospects journal December 2019
Mitigating energy demand sector emissions: The integrated modelling perspective journal March 2020
Have Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Energy Production Peaked? State Level Evidence from Six Subsectors preprint May 2019
Mechanical Activation of the Ca-Rich Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion Fly Ash: Development of an Alternative Binder System journal December 2020