skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Goals of the PCSRI

Abstract

No abstract provided.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE
OSTI Identifier:
1352408
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-17-23108
DOE Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS

Citation Formats

Garrett, Charles Kristopher. Goals of the PCSRI. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.2172/1352408.
Garrett, Charles Kristopher. Goals of the PCSRI. United States. doi:10.2172/1352408.
Garrett, Charles Kristopher. Mon . "Goals of the PCSRI". United States. doi:10.2172/1352408. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1352408.
@article{osti_1352408,
title = {Goals of the PCSRI},
author = {Garrett, Charles Kristopher},
abstractNote = {No abstract provided.},
doi = {10.2172/1352408},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Apr 17 00:00:00 EDT 2017},
month = {Mon Apr 17 00:00:00 EDT 2017}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • Research and development goal packages were developed for the state-of-the-art, flow-through, and bipolar lead-acid batteries, nickel/iron, nickel/zinc, nickel/cadmium, zinc/bromine, iron/air, lithium/iron sulfide, and sodium/sulfur technologies. Since each battery must satisfy mission power/energy requirements throughout every cycle of its operating life, the principal ''design point'' is the end-of-life condition. Since all batteries exhibit deteriorating performance with age, excess kWh capacity of 20 to 30 percent is required early in life. The Battery Panel first identified present state-of-the-art performance characteristics and design interrelationships for each battery technology, and projected the degree of advance expected by 1995. Near-term and 1995 design tradeoffs weremore » modeled using the EVA computerized system developed by ANL. The next step was to target each battery system for a single range (80, 120 or 160 km), depending on its projected 1995 capabilities. For each battery, baseline calculations were carried out assuming the maximum battery weight (695 kg) to be on board. In addition to performance, life, and cost goals, development targets were also established for efficiency, maintenance, and allowable self-discharge rate. The Task Force attempted to establish battery cost requirements, assuming economic parity (in 1995) with other modes of transportation.« less
  • This report on the Department of Energy (DOE) mission directed goals for electric vehicle battery research and development is a revision and update of report DOE/CE-0148. The original report was prepared by the Task Force on Electric Vehicle Battery Goals and published by the Electric and Hybrid Propulsion (EHP) Division of the Office of Transportation Systems. The EHP Division of the DOE formed the Task Force on Electric Vehicle Battery Goals to evaluate existing EV battery R and D goals and to recommend new battery goals targeted at the urban van mission. The original report (DOE/CE-0148) was distributed to governmentmore » and industry for review and comment. After consolidation of the comments, each comment was considered in the context of the project scope. INEL edited and published this document as the final report on the efforts of the Task Force on Electric Vehicle-Battery Goals. To the extent possible within the original scope of the project, the comments of government and industry are incorporated herein. This report will be updated periodically as results from current research, both federally and privately supported, become available.« less
  • Public utility regulators are currently wrestling with the issue of how and to what extent the social goals that have grown up around traditional regulation might be continued in a restructured electric power industry. This report critically examines six mechanisms that could be used for this purpose in the wake of the introduction of competition in the generation segment. Their pros and cons are thoroughly appraised in economic terms.